Journals / Ege Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Colonization and antimicrobial resistance patern of group B streptococcus in pregnant women

Gebelerde grup B streptokok kolonizasyonu ve antimikrobiyal direnç paterni

Pages
151–154
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The overall maternal carriage rate was found to be %8 while vaginal colonization rate was %2.6.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalance of group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization and to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance patern in the third term pregnants in respect to the importance of maternal and neonatal GBS infections.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this prospective study over a tree-months period 112 third term pregnant women were screened for GBS colonization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The overall maternal carriage rate was found to be %8 while vaginal colonization rate was %2.6.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gebelik · İleriye dönük çalışma · Mikrobiyal duyarlılık testleri

Abstract

: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalance of group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization and to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance patern in the third term pregnants in respect to the importance of maternal and neonatal GBS infections. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study over a tree-months period 112 third term pregnant women were screened for GBS colonization. Samples were collected from the vagina, rectum and the urethra. Results: The overall maternal carriage rate was found to be %8 while vaginal colonization rate was %2.6. All of the isolates were sensitive to penicillin, clindamycin, azithromycin, cephazoline, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone whereas all were resistant to tetracycline. Conclusion : In conclusion, screening and evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of GBS during pregnancy is important to guide appropriate intrapartum prophylaxis.

Özet

Bu çalısma grup B streptokokların (GBS) anne ve yenidoğan enfeksiyonlarındaki önemi dikkate alınarak üçüncü trimestr gebelerde GBS kolonizasyon oranını ve antimikrobiyal direnç profilini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. Gereç Yöntem: Bu prospektif çalısmada üç aylık süre içinde üçüncü trimestrdeki 112 gebeden vaginal, rektal ve üretral sürüntü örnekleri alındı. Bulgular : Toplam kolonizasyon oranı %8, vaginal kolonizasyon oranı %2.6 olarak saptandı. Hiçbir kökende penisilin, klindamisin, azitromisin, seftriakson, sefazolin, sefotaksim direnci saptanmazken kökenlerin tamamı tetrasikline dirençli bulunmustur. Tartısma : Sonuç olarak hamilelerin GBS tasıyıcılığı yönünden taranması ve antimikrobial direnç paterninin arastırılmasının intrapartum profilaksiye yön vermek açısından önemli olduğunu düsünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKUŞ, M., KARACA, D. Y., GÜNÇİNER, Ş. (2007). Colonization and antimicrobial resistance patern of group B streptococcus in pregnant women. Ege Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 151–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/221574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Edwards MS, Baker JC. Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus). Mandell GL, Douglas RC, Bennett JE, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5inci baskı. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 2156-64
  2. Brooks GF, Butel JS, Morse SA. The Streptococci. Jawetz, Melnick, Adelberg eds. Medical Microbiology. 22inci baskı. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001: 203-16
  3. Main EK, Slagle T. Prevention of early-onset invasive neonatal group B streptococcal disease in a private hospital setting: the superiority of culture based protocols. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1344-7
  4. Gokalp AS, Bakici MZ. Relationship between neonatal group B streptococcal colonization and the maternal urogenital and anorectal system carrier state. Mikrobiyol Bul 1985; 19(2): 65-72
  5. Bilgehan H: Klinik Mikrobiyolojik Tanı. 2nci basım. Đzmir: Safak Matbaacılık, 1995: 507-515
  6. National Committie for Clinical Laboratory Standarts (NCCLS): Performance standarts for antimicrobial suspectibility testing. Ninth informational supplement. NCCLS Document M100-S9, Wayne,Pennsylvania 1999; 19: 1
  7. Regan JA, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP. The epidemiology of group B streptococcal colonization in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 604-10
  8. Antony BF, Okada DM, Hobel CJ. Epidemiology of group B streptococcus: longitudinal observations during pregnancy. J Infect Dis 1978; 137: 524-30
  9. Dillon HC Jr, Gray E, Pass MA, Gray BM. Anorectal and vaginal carriage of group B streptococci during pregnancy. J Infect Dis 1982; 145: 794-9
  10. Meyn LA, Moore DM, Hillier SL, Krohn MA. Association of sexual activity with colonization and vaginal acquisition of group B streptococcus in nonpregnant women. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155: 949-57
  11. Bolatlı T, Aksit F, Kiraz N. Gebelerde son trimestrde grup B streptokok kolonizasyonu. Türk Mikrobiyol Cemiy Derg 1989; 19: 309-14
  12. Gül HC, Dede M, Avcı ĐY, Eyigün CP, Pahsa A. Üçüncü trimestr Hamilelerde vaginal grup B streptokok kolonizasyonu. Klimik Derg 2005; 18: 27-29
  13. Çelebi S, Tuncel E, Babacan M. Yöremiz gebe kadınlar ve yenidoğanlarda B grubu streptokok prevalansı. Mikrobiol Bül 1992; 26: 149-54
  14. Arısoy AS, Altınısık B, Tünger Ö, Kurutepe S, Đspahi C. Maternal carriage and antimicrobial resistance profile of group B streptococcus. Infection 2003; 31: 244-6
  15. Barbaros I, Murat C, Mehmet V ve ark. The colonization incidence of group B streptococcus in pregnant women and their newborns in Đstanbul. Pedi