Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2002 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

The Need for Confirmation in Coliform and E. coli Enumeration in Foods

Pages
1049–1053
Publication Date
2002-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Enumeration results were statistically analyzed to determine whether confirmation tests for coliform and E. coli analysis are necessary or not according to the results of three statistical reliability analyses: Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), Cronbach's alpha (a) and determination coefficient (r2).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For food and environmental analysis, coliform bacteria and especially E. coli should be determined and enumerated rapidly, correctly and economically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 500 food samples of 10 various types were analyzed for their natural coliform contamination by the standard MPN method and E. coli by two MUG based MPN techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Enumeration results were statistically analyzed to determine whether confirmation tests for coliform and E. coli analysis are necessary or not according to the results of three statistical reliability analyses: Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), Cronbach's alpha (a) and determination coefficient (r2).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Coliforms · E. coli · MUG

Abstract

For food and environmental analysis, coliform bacteria and especially E. coli should be determined and enumerated rapidly, correctly and economically. Even if the results are obtained either by traditional or improved techniques, the results require confirmation, meaning that these techniques are not reliable. Confirmation tests need additional time and/or cost. In this study, 500 food samples of 10 various types were analyzed for their natural coliform contamination by the standard MPN method and E. coli by two MUG based MPN techniques. Enumeration results were statistically analyzed to determine whether confirmation tests for coliform and E. coli analysis are necessary or not according to the results of three statistical reliability analyses: Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), Cronbach's alpha (a) and determination coefficient (r2). The results clearly showed that BGB broth confirmation for LST broth in coliform analysis and indole test confirmation for MUG test in E. coli analysis are not necessary (p < 0.0001).

Özet

For food and environmental analysis, coliform bacteria and especially E. coli should be determined and enumerated rapidly, correctly and economically. Even if the results are obtained either by traditional or improved techniques, the results require confirmation, meaning that these techniques are not reliable. Confirmation tests need additional time and/or cost. In this study, 500 food samples of 10 various types were analyzed for their natural coliform contamination by the standard MPN method and E. coli by two MUG based MPN techniques. Enumeration results were statistically analyzed to determine whether confirmation tests for coliform and E. coli analysis are necessary or not according to the results of three statistical reliability analyses: Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), Cronbach's alpha (a) and determination coefficient (r2). The results clearly showed that BGB broth confirmation for LST broth in coliform analysis and indole test confirmation for MUG test in E. coli analysis are not necessary (p < 0.0001).

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, İ. (2002). The Need for Confirmation in Coliform and E. coli Enumeration in Foods. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 1049–1053. https://ajindex.com/articles/220641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...