SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Factors Affecting Usage İntention of Shared Electric Scooter Services

Paylaşımlı Elektrikli Scooter Hizmetlerini Kullanma Niyetinde Etkili Olan Faktörler

Mehmet Cem BÖLEN
Orhan ÇELİKER
Pages
1101–1123
Publication Date
2021-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that consumers perceive shared e-scooter services as a useful and enjoyable means of transportation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the factors affecting consumers' adoption of shared e-scooter services were examined from the perspective of “Value-based Adoption Model”.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The structural equation modeling technique (SEM) was employed to evaluate the proposed research model, and the proposed model was empirically tested using data collected from 118 actual users of shared e-scooter services in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that consumers perceive shared e-scooter services as a useful and enjoyable means of transportation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Shared E-Scooter · Value based Adoption Model · Micro-mobility

Abstract

In this study, the factors affecting consumers' adoption of shared e-scooter services were examined from the perspective of “Value-based Adoption Model”. The structural equation modeling technique (SEM) was employed to evaluate the proposed research model, and the proposed model was empirically tested using data collected from 118 actual users of shared e-scooter services in Turkey. The results showed that consumers perceive shared e-scooter services as a useful and enjoyable means of transportation. On the other hand, it was observed that the perceived price of e-scooter shared services was negatively associated with perceived value. Lastly, It has been demonstrated that consumers see shared e-scooter services as a valuable service, and this strongly affects their use of these services.

Özet

Bu çalışmada tüketicilerin paylaşımlı e-scooter hizmetlerini benimsemelerinde etkili olan faktörler “Değer Temelli Benimseme Modeli” perspektifinden incelenmiştir. Bu kapsamda geliştirilen araştırma modeli, daha önce Türkiye’de paylaşımlı e-scooter hizmetini kullanmış 118 kişiden toplanan veriler kullanılarak yapısal eşitlik modellemesi tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda tüketicilerin, paylaşımlı e-scooter hizmetlerini kullanışlı ve eğlenceli bir ulaşım aracı olarak gördükleri sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bununla birlikte paylaşımlı e-scooter hizmetleri ücretlerinin, bu hizmetlerin tüketiciler için sundukları değeri olumsuz etkilediği gözlemlenmiştir. Son olarak tüketicilerin, paylaşımlı e-scooter hizmetlerini değerli bir hizmet olarak gördükleri ve söz konusu hizmetleri kullanmalarını güçlü şekilde etkilediği ortaya koyulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÖLEN, M. C., ÇELİKER, O. (2021). Factors Affecting Usage İntention of Shared Electric Scooter Services. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 1101–1123. https://ajindex.com/articles/220636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Allem, J.-P., & Majmundar, A. (2019). Are electric scooters promoted on social media with safety in mind? A case study on Bird’s Instagram. Preventive medicine reports, 13, 62–63.
  2. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırm, E. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Arastirma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamali. Adapazari: Sakarya Kitabevi.
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. Boksberger, P. E., & Melsen, L. (2011). Perceived value: A critical examination of definitions, concepts and measures for the service industry. Içinde Journal of Services Marketing (C. 25, Sayı 3, ss. 229–240). https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041111129209
  4. Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvönen, K., Puhakainen, J., & Walden, P. (2006). Adoption of mobile devices/services - Searching for answers with the UTAUT. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.38.
  5. Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
  6. Cocosila, M., & Trabelsi, H. (2016). An integrated value-risk investigation of contactless mobile payments adoption. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 20, 159-170.
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Quarterly, 319–340.
  8. Degele, J., Gorr, A., Haas, K., Kormann, D., Krauss, S., Lipinski, P., Tenbih, M., Koppenhoefer, C., Fauser, J., & Hertweck, D. (2018). Identifying EScooter Sharing Customer Segments Using Clustering. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2018 - Proceedings, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436288
  9. Dillon, A. (2001). User acceptance of information technology. London: Taylor and Francis. Dodds, W., & Monroe, K. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. Advances in consumer research, 12(1), 85–90. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/6364/volumes/v12/NA - 12 Doğan, D. (2019). SmartPLS İle Veri Analizi 2. Baskı. Ankara:
  10. Zet Yayınları.
  11. Dursun, Y., & Çerçi, U. M. (2004). Algılanan sağlık hizmeti kalitesi, algılanan değer, hasta tatmini ve davranışsal niyet ilişkileri üzerine bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23. Eccarius, T., & Lu, C. C. (2020). Adoption intentions for m