Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

İlk Seans Şok Dalga Litotripsi Öncesi Anksiyetenin İşlem Esnasında Ağrı Üzerine Etkisi

The Effect of Pre-Procedure Anxiety on Pain Perception During First Session of Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Pages
18–21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion According to our results, reducing patient anxiety, if any, can provide some additional pain control during SWL procedure and can improve patient compliance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction Although shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a common noninvasive procedure, it can be very painful and a serious source of anxiety which may affect pain perception.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods A total of 54 patients, who underwent the first session of SWL treatment between January and April 2014 due to a single renal pelvic stone with a diameter less than 20 mm, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion According to our results, reducing patient anxiety, if any, can provide some additional pain control during SWL procedure and can improve patient compliance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction Although shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a common noninvasive procedure, it can be very painful and a serious source of anxiety which may affect pain perception. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between patient's anxiety and SWL-related pain. Materials and Methods A total of 54 patients, who underwent the first session of SWL treatment between January and April 2014 due to a single renal pelvic stone with a diameter less than 20 mm, were included in the study. All patients were particularly informed about the procedure and, then, the validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale was administered in order to identify the anxiety level before the procedure. All relevant data, such as age, sex, stone size, body mass index (BMI), anxiety score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, skin-to-stone distance, and total energy were recorded. Results The mean age of the study population was 41.11±16.35 years. The mean stone size, anxiety level before procedure, VAS score during SWL, BMI, skin-to-stone distance and energy level were 10.69±4.75 mm (5-20 mm), 5.2±3.87; 6.5±2.46; 25.77±4.16; 7.23±2.10 cm; 56.53±16.74 joule, respectively. Anxiety prior to procedure, energy level and the number of total shock wave had a significant effect on VAS score (p<0.05). Sex, stone size, BMI and skin-to-stone distance did not significantly affect the VAS scores (p>0.05). Conclusion According to our results, reducing patient anxiety, if any, can provide some additional pain control during SWL procedure and can improve patient compliance.

Özet

Amaç Şok dalga litotripsi, üriner sistem taş hastalığı tedavisinde kullanılan invazif olmayan yöntemlerin başında gelmesine rağmen oluşturduğu ağrı ve anksiyete nedeni ile bazı hastalar tarafından tolere edilememektedir. Bu çalışmada şok dalga litotripsi öncesinde hastada oluşan anksiyetenin işlem esnasındaki ağrıya etkisi araştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem Çalışmaya Ocak 2014-Nisan 2014 tarihleri arasında 20 mm'den küçük tek böbrek pelvis taşı nedeni ile ilk defa şok dalga litotripsi tedavisi yapılan 54 hasta dahil edildi. İşlem öncesinde tüm hastalar şok dalga litotripsi hakkında detaylı olarak bilgilendirildikten sonra valide edilmiş Hastane Anksiyete Depresyon ölçeği doldurtularak anksiyete seviyeleri ölçüldü. İşlemden hemen sonra ise şok dalga litotripsi süresince hissettikleri ağrı vizüel ağrı skalası doldurtularak değerlendirildi. Ayrıca yaş, cinsiyet, taş boyutu, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ), deri-taş mesafesi, uygulanan toplam enerji miktarı da kayıt altına alınarak tüm bu değişkenlerin ağrı ile ilişkisi araştırıldı. Bulgular Kırk beş (83,3%) erkek 9 (16,7%) kadın toplam 54 hastanın ortalama yaşı 41,11±16,35 idi. Ortalama taş boyutu, işlem öncesi anksiyete seviyesi, işlem esnasındaki ağrı skoru, VKİ, deri-taş mesafesi, şok dalga litotripsi için uygulanan toplam enerji seviyesi sıra ile 10,69±4,75 mm, 5,2±3,87; 6,5±2,46; 25,77±4,16; 7,23±2,10 cm; 56,53±16,74 jul idi. İşlem öncesi anksiyete seviyesi, toplam uygulanan enerji ve şok dalga sayısı ağrı skorları üzerine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede etkili bulundu (p 0,05). Sonuç Elde ettiğimiz sonuçlara göre işlem öncesi anksiyete şok dalga litotripsi esnasında ağrıyı etkileyen faktörlerden birisidir ve anksiyeteye yönelik alınacak önlemler ağrı kontrolüne, dolayısı ile hasta uyumuna katkı sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, Ö., SARAÇOĞLU, F., ŞENKUL, T., ZOR, M., SOYDAN, H., MALKOÇ, E., ATEŞ, F. (2016). İlk Seans Şok Dalga Litotripsi Öncesi Anksiyetenin İşlem Esnasında Ağrı Üzerine Etkisi. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 18–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/220412

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Rassweiler J, Rassweiler MC, Frede T, Alken P. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: An opinion on its future. Indian J Urol 2014;30:73-79.
  2. Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Gnessin E, Evan AP. Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique. Nat Rev Urol 2009;6:660-670.
  3. Kang JH, Lee SW, Moon SH, Sung HH, Choo SH, Han DH. Relationship between patient position and pain severity during shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones with the MODULITH SLX-F2 lithotripter: a matched case- control study. Korean J Urol 2013;54:531-535.
  4. Ngee-Ming G, Tamsin D, Rai BP, Somani BK. Complementary approaches to decreasing discomfort during shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Urolithiasis 2014;42:189-193.
  5. Tokgöz H, Hanci V, Türksoy O, Erol B, Akduman B, Mungan NA. Pain perception during shock wave lithotripsy: does it correlate with patient and stone characteristics? J Chin Med Assoc 2010;73:477-482.
  6. Berwin JT, El-Husseiny T, Papatsoris AG, Hajdinjak T, Masood J, Buchholz N. Pain in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 2009;37:51-53.
  7. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:69-77.
  8. Aydemir Ö, Güvenir T, Küey L, Kültür S. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1977;8:280-287.
  9. Saussine C, Lechevallier E, Traxer O. [Urolithiasis and guidelines]. ProgUrol 2008;18:841-843.
  10. Ng CF, Thompson T, Tolley D. Characteristics and treatment outcome of patients requiring additional intravenous analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with Dornier compact delta lithotriptor. Int Urol Nephrol 2007;39:731-735.
  11. Robert M, Lanfrey P, Rey G, Guiter J, Navratil H. Analgesia in piezoelectric SWL: comparative study of kidney and upper ureter treatments. J Endourol 1999;13:391-395.
  12. Vergnolles M, Wallerand H, Gadrat F, Maurice-Tison S, Deti E, Ballanger P, Ferriere JM, Robert G. Predictive risk factors for pain during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 2009;23:2021-2027.
  13. Salinas AS, Lorenzo-Romero J, Segura M, Calero MR, Hernández-Millán I, Martínez-Martín M, Virseda JA. Factors determining analgesic and sedative drug requirements during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int 1999;68:92-101.
  14. Tailly GG, Marcelo JB, Schneider IA, Byttebier G, Daems K. Patient-controlled analgesia during SWL treatments. J Endourol 2001;15:465-471.
  15. Bach C, Zaman F, Kachrilas S, Kumar P,