Bladder Neck Involvement in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens is not a pT4 Disease

References (1)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-249. 2.Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Kennedy BJ. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual for Staging of Cancer, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1992. 3.Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed. New York, Springer, 2010. 4.Yossepowitch O, Sircar K, Scardino PT, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Reuter VE. Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. J Urol 2002;168:2011-2015. 5.Buschemeyer WC, Hamilton RJ, Aronson WJ, Presti JC Jr, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Freedland SJ. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database. J Urol 2008;179:124-129. 6.Zhou M, Reuther AM, Levin HS, Falzarano SM, Kodjoe E, Myles J, Klein E, Magi-Galluzzi C. Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor. Mod Pathol 2009;22:385-392. 7.Pierorazio PM, Epstein JI, Humphreys E, Han M, Walsh PC, Partin AW. The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer PathologicalStage T4 designation is not warranted. J Urol 2010;183:151-157. 8.Chung MS, Lee SH, Lee DH, Chung BH. Evaluation of the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Prostate Cancer in Point of Classification of Bladder Neck Invasion. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013;43:184-188. 9.Califano JA, Lydiatt WM, Nehal KS. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed. New York, NY, Springer, 2017. 10.Silberstein JL, Eastham JA. Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy. Indian J Urol 2014;30:423- 428.