Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

ATATÜRK’S CONTRIBUTION TO MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES: THE EFFECT OF INTERPERSONAL LIKING – RESPECT, TRUST – OBEDIENCE TO AUTHORITY, WORK DISCIPLINE AND PEACE OF MIND ON CAREER SUCCESS

ATATÜRK’ÜN YÖNETİM ORGANİZASYON ALANINA BİR KATKISI: SEVGİ- SAYGI, GÜVEN – OTORİTEYE İTAAT, İŞ DİSİPLİNİ VE HUZURUN KARİYER BAŞARISINA ETKİSİ

Pages
120–135
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis of the data obtained from 459 employees revealed that liking and respect has a positive effect on trust and obedience, trust and obedience has a positive effect on work discipline, work discipline has a positive effect on peace of mind and peace of mind has a positive effect on career success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study examines the validity of the founder of Turkish Republic; Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s quote “Where there is mutual liking and respect, there is trust and obedience.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There is discipline where there is trust and obedience.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis of the data obtained from 459 employees revealed that liking and respect has a positive effect on trust and obedience, trust and obedience has a positive effect on work discipline, work discipline has a positive effect on peace of mind and peace of mind has a positive effect on career success.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütlerde Sevgi · Örgütlerde Saygı · Örgütlerde Güven

Abstract

The present study examines the validity of the founder of Turkish Republic; Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s quote “Where there is mutual liking and respect, there is trust and obedience. There is discipline where there is trust and obedience. There is peace of mind where there is discipline, and success where there is peace of mind.” in today’s organizations. Based on this quote, it aims to measure the antecedents of career success in organizations and the relationships between these variables. The analysis of the data obtained from 459 employees revealed that liking and respect has a positive effect on trust and obedience, trust and obedience has a positive effect on work discipline, work discipline has a positive effect on peace of mind and peace of mind has a positive effect on career success.

Özet

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin kurucusu Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’ün “Nerede karşılıklı sevgi ve saygı varsa, orada itimat ve itaat vardır. İtimat ve itaatin olduğu yerde disiplin vardır. Disiplinin olduğu yerde huzur, huzurun olduğu yerde başarı vardır.” özdeyişinin günümüz örgütlerinde geçerliliği irdeleyen bu çalışma, bu özdeyişten hareketle, örgütlerde kariyer başarısının öncelleri ve bu değişkenlerin birbirleriyle ilişkilerini ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Anketi cevaplayan 473 çalışandan elde edilen verilerin analizi sonucunda sevgi ve saygının güven ve itaat, güven ve itaatin iş disiplini, iş disiplinin huzur, huzurun da kariyer başarısı üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİNOĞLU, E., YOZGAT, U., ARTAN, İ. E. (2021). ATATÜRK’S CONTRIBUTION TO MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES: THE EFFECT OF INTERPERSONAL LIKING – RESPECT, TRUST – OBEDIENCE TO AUTHORITY, WORK DISCIPLINE AND PEACE OF MIND ON CAREER SUCCESS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 120–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/220262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aksoy, T. (2009, Haziran 23). Liderin otoritesi nereden gelir?, Erişim Adresi https://www.temelaksoy.com/liderin-otoritesi-nereden-gelir/
  2. Anders, G. (2006, September 18). What is success, anyway? The Wall Street Journal, R10. Arslan, E. (2011, Aralık 13). Neden “vizyoner”, Erişim Adresi http://www.yenimesaj.com.tr/neden-vizyoner-H1206648.htm
  3. Arthur, M.B., Khapova, S.N. & Wilderom, C.P.M. (2005). Career success in a boundaryless career world, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 177-202.
  4. Aydın, O. (2002). Davranış üzerine sosyal etkiler. E. Özkalp (Der./Ed.) Davranış bilimlerine giriş: 261-278. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  5. Bannengala, R.R. (2018). Mantras for career success: Get set go! Chennai: Notion Press.
  6. Biro, B.D. (1997). Beyond success: The 15 secrets to effective leadership and life based on legendary coach John Wooden’s pyramid of success. New York: Perigee Book. Bugdol, M. (2018). A different approach to work discipline: Models, manifestations and methods of behaviour modification. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Bulińska-Stangrecka, H. & Bagieńska, A. (2018). Investigating the links of interpersonal trust in telecommunications companies, Sustainability, 10(7), 2555. Carmeli, A. & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 709-729.
  7. Carmeli, A. & Spreitzer, G. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 169–191.
  8. Cascio, W.F. (2010). Managing human resources productivity, quality of work life, profits. 8th Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill. Chopra, D. (2016). 7 ways to make peace at the office. Erişim Adresi https://chopra.com/articles/7-ways-to-make-peace-at-the-office
  9. Cohen, J. (2014, June 18). 5 proven methods for gaining self discipline Erişim Adresi https://www.forbes.com/sites/jennifercohen/2014/06/18/5-proven-methods-for-gaining-self-discipline/#798f45c23c9f
  10. Cook, J. & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39-52.
  11. Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL. Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory, Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21-50