Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

NEOLIBERALISM AND THE NEW CULTURAL CONDITION OF CITIES

NEOLİBERALİZM VE ŞEHİRLERİN YENİ KÜLTÜREL KOŞULLARI

Pages
89–97
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to provide a comprehensive discussion on neoliberalism and examine its socio-cultural influence on urban spaces via evaluating some examples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Neoliberalism is an important phenomenon which can be understood by examining socio-cultural context, political priorities, management mentalities, and projects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some examples of this influence can be examined by: Istanbul’s Capital of Culture nomination in 2010, international cultural events like Biennial, and gentrification projects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study aims to provide a comprehensive discussion on neoliberalism and examine its socio-cultural influence on urban spaces via evaluating some examples.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Neoliberalizm · Şehir Kültürü · Şehirler

Abstract

Neoliberalism is an important phenomenon which can be understood by examining socio-cultural context, political priorities, management mentalities, and projects. It has a wide influence on global to right down to intra-subjective web of relationships. An analysis of the neoliberal condition helps us to understand a wide range of contemporary cultural occurrences, because neoliberalism reasserts itself as a restructuration project, acting as a powerful force on material life. These projects can, accordingly, be context-dependent, insofar as they are considered to be products of the national, regional, and local contexts, defined and limited by the legacies of inherited institutional frameworks, policy regimes, regulatory practices, and political struggles. Some examples of this influence can be examined by: Istanbul’s Capital of Culture nomination in 2010, international cultural events like Biennial, and gentrification projects. This study aims to provide a comprehensive discussion on neoliberalism and examine its socio-cultural influence on urban spaces via evaluating some examples.

Özet

Neoliberalleşme sosyo-kültürel etkiler, siyasi öncelikler, yönetim zihniyetleri ve projeleri ile etkileşim ve kesişim içindedir. Bu özelliğiyle neoliberalizm hem bireysel hem de toplumsal deneyimlerle ortaya çıkan bağlam bağımlı ilişkiler ağı olarak tanımlanabilmektedir. Neoliberalizmin etkilerini anlatan tek bir tanımlama olmayıp, neoliberalizm gücünü “hibrit (karma) yönetim biçimi veya bağlam bağımlı bir düzenleme uygulaması” olarak ekonomik ve yönetim mantığından almaktadır. Neoliberalizm, günlük hayatımızda etkin bir güç olarak kendini göstermektedir. Şehirlere kültür aracılığıyla yabancı sermayeyi çeken; bienaller gibi uluslararası kültür sanat etkinlikleri, kentsel dönüşümle soylulaştırılan projelerle ya da İstanbul örneğinde küresel sermayenin artan hareketliliğine karşılık veren kentin 2010 yılında İstanbul Kültür Başkenti seçilmesi, bu etkiyi değerlendirebileceğimiz örnekler olarak düşünülebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, neoliberalizmin tanımlamasına kapsamlı bir tartışma sunarak, şehir kültür alanlarında yarattığı örnekleri değerlendirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, E. A. (2021). NEOLIBERALISM AND THE NEW CULTURAL CONDITION OF CITIES. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 89–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/220259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akçalı, E. ve Korkut, U.(2015). Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits. Political Geopraphy, 46,76–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004. Aksoy, A. (2010). İstanbul: Dilemma of direction. In Europa Nostra Annual Conference, Istanbul, pp. 8-12.
  2. Atia, M.A. (2012). A way to paradise: Pious neoliberalism, Islam, and faith-based development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(4),808–827.
  3. Bacal, E. D. (2013). Artwork: Santiago Sierra and the socio-aesthetics of production. Graduate Journal of Visual and Material Culture, 6, 1–17.
  4. Bıçakcı, A.B. (2012). Branding the city through culture: Istanbul, European Capital of Culture 2010. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(1)993-1006.
  5. Brenner, N., Peck, J. ve Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global networks, 10(2), 182–222. Doğan, A.E. (2007). Eğreti kamusallık: Kayseri örneğinde islamcı belediyecilik. İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları.
  6. Foucault, M. (1984). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–77.
  7. Gordon, C. (ed), transl. Gordon C., Marshall, L., Mepham, J. and Soper, K. New York, Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (2008). Seguridad, territorio, población ( Vol. 265). Ediciones AKAL. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.
  8. Garcia B. (2005). Deconstructing the city of culture: The long-term legacies of Glasgow 1990. Urban Studies, 42(5-6), 841–868.
  9. Gielen, P. (2009). The Biennale: A post-institution for immaterial labour. Open 16: The Art Biennal as Global Phenomenon. Strategies in Neo-Political Times, NAI Publishers, pp. 8–17.
  10. Gilbert, J. (2013). What kind of thing is' neoliberalism'?.New Formations, 80, 7-22.
  11. Hall, S. (1988). Authoritarian populism: A reply to Jessop et al. in Hall S. (ed.) The hard road to renewal: Thatcherism and crisis of the left. London, Verso. Hall, S. (2011). The neo-liberal revolution. Cultural Studies, 25(6),705–728.
  12. Harb, M. ve Deeb, L. (2011). Culture as history and landscape: Hizbullah’s efforts to shape an Islamic milieu in Lebanon. Arab Studies Journal, 19(1),12–45.
  13. Hardt, M. ve Negri A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York, Penguin Books. Harvey, D. (2002). Spaces of capital. Towards a Critical Geography. Routledge Harvey, D.(2006). Spaces of global capitalism. A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. London, Verso. Harvey, D. (2009). Social Ju