SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED OVERQUALIFICATION ON EMPLOYEE VOICE

ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN ÇALIŞAN SESLİLİĞİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Ömer GİZLİER
Pages
57–67
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Managerial and practical implications are provided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of perceived overqualification on the employee voice which is various benefits in favor of the organization based on Self-Efficacy Theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consists of 103 service sector employees in Istanbul, which were reached in May 2019 by using convenient sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Managerial and practical implications are provided.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Algılanan aşırı niteliklilik · çalışan sesliliği · öz-yeterlilik teorisi

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of perceived overqualification on the employee voice which is various benefits in favor of the organization based on Self-Efficacy Theory. The sample of the study consists of 103 service sector employees in Istanbul, which were reached in May 2019 by using convenient sampling method. The survey technique was used as a data collection tool. The findings of the study show that perceived overqualification does not have any effect on employee voice and that there is no statistically significant relationship between perceived overqualification and employee voice. Managerial and practical implications are provided.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, algılanan aşırı nitelikliliğin örgüt lehine çeşitli yararları olan çalışan sesliliği üzerindeki etkisini Öz-Yeterlilik Teorisi’ne dayanarak incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini 2019 Mayıs ayında İstanbul’da kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile ulaşılan 103 hizmet sektörü çalışanı oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak anket tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları algılanan aşırı nitelikliliğin çalışan sesliliği üzerinde herhangi bir etkisinin olmadığını ve algılanan aşırı niteliklilik ile çalışan sesliliği arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı herhangi bir ilişki olmadığını göstermektedir. Araştırma sonucunda yönetici ve uygulayıcılar için çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GİZLİER, Ö. (2021). THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED OVERQUALIFICATION ON EMPLOYEE VOICE. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 57–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/220257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Basım, H. N., Korkmazyürek, H., & Tokat, A. O. (2008). Çalışanların öz yeterlilik algılamasının yenilikçilik ve risk alma üzerine etkisi: kamu sektöründe bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 121-130.
  2. Congregado, E., Iglesias, J., Millán, J. M., & Román, C. (2016). Incidence, effects, dynamics and routes out of overqualification in Europe: A comprehensive analysis distinguishing by employment status. Applied Economics, 48(5), 411-445.
  3. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
  4. Çakıcı, A. (2007). Örgütlerde sessizlik: Sessizliğin teorik temelleri ve dinamikleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 145-162.
  5. Çetin, Ş. & Çakmakçı C. (2012). Çalışan sesliliği ölçeğini türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, 22(2), 1-19.
  6. Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419-1452.
  7. Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: The moderating role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 557-565.
  8. Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Peiró, J. M., & Truxillo, D. M. (2011). Overqualified employees: Making the best of a potentially bad situation for individuals and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 215-232.
  9. Fine, S., & Edward, M. (2017). Breaking the rules, not the law: The potential risks of counterproductive work behaviors among overqualified employees. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(4), 401-405.
  10. Freeman R. (1976). The overeducated american. Academic Press.
  11. Garcy, A. M. (2015). Educational mismatch and mortality among native‐born workers in Sweden. A 19‐year longitudinal study of 2.5 million over‐educated, matched and under‐educated individuals, 1990–2008. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(8), 1314-1336.
  12. Greenberger, D. B., & Strasser, S. (1986). Development and application of a model of personal control in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 164-177.
  13. Harari, M. B., Manapragada, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2017). Who thinks they're a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 28-47.
  14. Hersch, J. (1995). Optimal ‘misma