Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT INVOLVEMENT, CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS AND PERCEIVED RISK ON IMPULSE BUYING

İÇGÜDÜSEL SATIN ALMAYA TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ, ÜRÜN İLGİLENİMİ VE ALGILANAN RİSKİN ETKİSİ

Pages
34–56
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consumers’ product involvement has the mediating effect between the relationship of consumer innovativeness and impulse buying tendency for both clothing and technology products.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consumers expect to get pleasure and enjoyment from the products, express themselves and to be able to show their social status beyond the purpose of providing functional benefits.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, the data were obtained through a questionnaire form prepared using the literature and 870 usable questionnaires collected using face-to-face survey method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consumers’ product involvement has the mediating effect between the relationship of consumer innovativeness and impulse buying tendency for both clothing and technology products.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İçgüdüsel Satın Alma · Tüketici Yenilikçiliği · Ürün İlgilenimi

Abstract

Consumers expect to get pleasure and enjoyment from the products, express themselves and to be able to show their social status beyond the purpose of providing functional benefits. Because of these changing expectations impulse buying has become more important day by day. Although there are a lot of factors that affect impulse buying, the factors that are controversial in literature and investigated with limited study are taken into consideration for determining the study factors. The main purpose of this study is to determine the effect of consumer innovativeness, consumer’s product involvement and perceived risk factors that affect impulse buying in clothing and technology product category. In the study, the data were obtained through a questionnaire form prepared using the literature and 870 usable questionnaires collected using face-to-face survey method. According to the research results, the factors that affect Impulse Buying yielded similar results for both in clothing and technology products. Consumers’ product involvement has the mediating effect between the relationship of consumer innovativeness and impulse buying tendency for both clothing and technology products.

Özet

Tüketiciler satın aldıkları ürünlerden sadece fonksiyonel fayda sağlamanın ötesinde haz ve keyif almayı, kendilerini ifade edebilmeyi, sosyal statülerini gösterebilmeyi de beklemektedirler. Değişen bu beklentiler nedeniyle içgüdüsel satın alma her geçen gün hem uygulayıcılar hem de araştırmacılar için daha önemli hale gelmektedir. İçgüdüsel satın almaya etki eden pek çok faktör bulunmasına rağmen, bu çalışmaya konu olan faktörlerin belirlenmesinde literatürde tartışmalı olan ya da kısıtlı çalışma ile araştırılmış faktörler dikkate alınmıştır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı; içgüdüsel satın almaya tüketici yenilikçiliği, tüketicinin ürün ilgilenimi ve algılanan risk faktörlerinin etkisinin giyim ve teknoloji ürün kategorilerinde belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada veri, literatürden faydalanarak hazırlanan soru formu aracılığıyla ve yüz yüze anket yöntemi kullanılarak toplanmıştır. 870 adet kullanılabilir anket verisinin analizleri neticesinde; içgüdüsel satın almaya etki eden faktörler giyim ve teknoloji ürünlerinin her ikisinde benzer sonuçlar vermiştir. Yine, giyim ve teknoloji ürünlerinin her ikisi için de tüketici yenilikçiliği ile genel içgüdüsel satın alma eğilimi arasındaki ilişkide ürün ilgilenimi aracılık etkisi göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZOĞLU, B., BÜLBÜL, H. (2021). THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT INVOLVEMENT, CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS AND PERCEIVED RISK ON IMPULSE BUYING. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 34–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/220256

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Afzal, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extension into Related and Unrelated Product Categories. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(2), s. 216-226.
  2. Amos, C., Holmes, G., & Kenes, W. (2014). A Meta-analysis of Consumer Impulse Buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21, s. 86–97.
  3. Arslan, F., & Bakır, N. (2010). Tüketicilerin İlgilenim Düzeylerine Göre Alışveriş Merkezlerini Tercih Etme Nedenleri ve Sadakate Etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), s. 227-259.
  4. Baumgarten, S. (1975). The Innovative Communicator in the Diffusion Process. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(1), s. 12-18.
  5. Bayley, G., & Nancarrow, C. (1998). Impulse Purchasing: a Qualitative Exploration of the Phenomenon. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1(2), s. 99-114.
  6. Beatty, S., & Ferrell, M. (1998). Impulse Buying: Modeling Its Precursors. Journal of Retailing, 74(2), s. 169-191.
  7. Bellenger, D., Robertson, D., & Hirschman, E. (1978). Impulse Buying Varies by Product. Journal of Advertising Research, 18(6), s. 15-18.
  8. Bennett, R., Hartel, C., & McColl-Kenenedy, J. (2005). Experience as a Moderator of Involvement and Satisfaction on Brand Loyalty in a Business-to-business Setting. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, s. 97-107.
  9. Bloch, P. (1981). An Exploration into the Scaling of Consumers' Involvement with a Product Class. Advances in Consumer Research, s. 61-65.
  10. Boyle, R., & Ruppel, C. (2006). The Effects of Personal Innovativeness, Perceived Risk, and Computer Self-Efficacy on Online Purchasing Intent. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 15(2), s. 61-73.
  11. Chang, H., Yan, R.-N., & Eckman, M. (2014). Moderating Effects of Situational Characteristics on Impulse Buying. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42(4), s. 298 - 314. Chang, M.-L., & Wu, W.-Y. (2012). Revisiting Perceived Risk in the Context of Online Shopping: An Alternative Perspective of Decision-Making Styles. Psychology & Marketing, 29(5), s. 378–400.
  12. Clover, V. (1950). Relative Importance of Impulse-Buying in Retail Store. The Journal of Marketing, s. 66-70.
  13. Cobb, C., & Hoyer, W. (1986). Planned versus Impulse Purchase Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 62(4), s. 384-409.
  14. Coley, A., & Burgess, B. (2003). Gender Differences in Cognitive and Affective Impulse Buying. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7(3), s. 282-295.
  15. Cowart, K., Fox, G., & Wilson, A. (2008). A Structural Look at Consume