SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Development of Self-Efficacy for Argumentation Scale

Rabiya KIRAN
Eylem YILDIZ FEYZİOĞLU
Pages
449–475
Publication Date
2021-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The accepted fit indices for the repeated CFA results were X2 / sd = 2.62; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to develop a “Self-Efficacy Scale for Argumentation” (SEAS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of the study consisted of 879 pre-service teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The accepted fit indices for the repeated CFA results were X2 / sd = 2.62; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:argumentation · self-efficacy · self-efficacy for argumentation

Abstract

The aim of the study is to develop a “Self-Efficacy Scale for Argumentation” (SEAS). The participants of the study consisted of 879 pre-service teachers. In order to examine construct validity of SEAS, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were utilised. The initial solution of the EFA results revealed that three-factor structure consisting of 24 items called "Effort", "Confidence" and "Determination" for argumentation was obtained. Since the factor-item correlations were not significant for the "Determination" scale (p>.05), the two-factor structure consisting of the “Effort” and “Confidence” for argumentation was validated by the repeated CFA. The accepted fit indices for the repeated CFA results were X2 / sd = 2.62; p

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAN, R., FEYZİOĞLU, E. Y. (2021). Development of Self-Efficacy for Argumentation Scale. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 449–475. https://ajindex.com/articles/220124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aka, E. İ. (2016). An investigation into prospective science teacher’ attitudes towards laboratory course and self-efficacy beliefs in laboratory use. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(10), 3319-3331.
  2. Akkuş, A. (2020). Laboratuvar öz yeterlik ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 991-1014. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.800917
  3. Aktamış, H., & Hiğde, E. (2017). Argümantasyon nedir? In H. Aktamış (Ed.), Örnek etkinliklerle fen eğitiminde argümantasyon (pp. 7-27).
  4. Anı Publications. Akyüz, M. (2018). Argümantasyon tabanlı öğrenme ortamlarının sınıf öğretmen adaylarının kavramsal anlamalarına etkisi genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalar örneği [Unpublished master’s thesis dissertation]. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.
  5. Aldağ, H. (2006). Toulmin tartışma modeli [The Toulmin model of argumentation]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(1), 13-34.
  6. Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20213
  7. Aydeniz, M., & Özdilek, Z. (2016). Assessing and enhancing pre-service science teachers' self-efficacy to teach science through argumentation: Challenges and possible solutions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1255-1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9649-y
  8. Aydoğdu, B., & Buldur, S. (2013). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bilimsel süreç becerilerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 6(4), 520-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/keg.6713
  9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
  10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71-81).
  11. Academic Press.
  12. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00024
  13. Bandura, A. (2004). The growing primacy of perceived efficacy in human self- development, adaptation and change. In M. S. Salanova, R. Grau, I. M. Martínez,