SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

A Meta-Synthesis Study on Citizenship Education Research within the Scope of Social Studies Lesson in Turkey

Burcu SEL
Pages
323–351
Publication Date
2021-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Under the main theme of components of citizenship education, three sub-themes were generated: basic elements in citizenship education, approaches in citizenship education, and problems in citizenship education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, the purpose is to develop a systematic perspective on the research on citizenship education within the scope of social studies field, to reveal the tendency of the studies, and to reach a synthesis in this direction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Meta-synthesis method was used for this purpose.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Under the main theme of components of citizenship education, three sub-themes were generated: basic elements in citizenship education, approaches in citizenship education, and problems in citizenship education.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:citizenship education · mmeta-synthesis · social studies

Abstract

In this research, the purpose is to develop a systematic perspective on the research on citizenship education within the scope of social studies field, to reveal the tendency of the studies, and to reach a synthesis in this direction. Meta-synthesis method was used for this purpose. Researches on "citizenship" were collected and reviewed according to certain criteria, and then the reading process was repeated in order to identify the relationships between the researches, similar, different aspects were identified by using perspective-based continuous comparison, and a synthesis has been reached based on the obtained findings. The researches were obtained from YÖK National Thesis Center and Ulakbim TRDizin. During the analysis of the data process, thematic synthesis and descriptive analysis were utilized. Three main themes were reached: citizenship types/approaches, citizenship perception, and components of citizenship education. Citizenship types/approaches are addressed as spatial, environmentally responsible, effective/effectual/active citizenship, global and digital citizenship. In the context of citizenship perception, it is seen that the subjects of meaning attributed to citizenship, citizenship awareness/identity construction, good/ideal citizen, patriotism are taken as a basis. Under the main theme of components of citizenship education, three sub-themes were generated: basic elements in citizenship education, approaches in citizenship education, and problems in citizenship education.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEL, B. (2021). A Meta-Synthesis Study on Citizenship Education Research within the Scope of Social Studies Lesson in Turkey. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 323–351. https://ajindex.com/articles/220118

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abowitz, K. K., & Harnish, J. (2006). Contemporary discourses of citizenship. Review of educational research, 76(4), 653-690.
  2. Banks, J. A. (2001). Citizenship education and diversity: Implications for teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 52(1), 5-16.
  3. Banks, J. A., & Nguyen, D. (2008). Diversity and citizenship education. In L., S. Levstik & C., A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp.137-154). New York: Routledge. Banks, J. A., & Nguyen, D. (2008). Diversity and citizenship education. Historical, theoretical and philosophical issues. A Levstik, LS; Tyson, CA Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education (pp. 137-154)
  4. Bauböck, R. (1994). Transnational citizenship: Membership and rights in international migration. Göttingen: Edward Elgar Publishing. Battistoni, R. M. (1997). Service learning and democratic citizenship. Theory into practice, 36(3), 150-156.
  5. Bondas, T., & Hall, E. O. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qualitative health research, 17(1), 113-121.
  6. Brandell, M. E., & Hinck, S. (1997). Service learning: Connecting citizenship with the classroom. NASSP Bulletin, 81(591), 49-56.
  7. Brooks, R. M., & Holford, J. A. (2009). Citizenship, learning and education: Themes and issues. 13(2), 85-103.
  8. Clark, P., & Case, R. (1999). Four purposes of citizenship education. In P. Clark & R. Case (Eds.), The Canadian Anthology of Social Studies (pp. 17-27).
  9. Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University Press.
  10. Dağ, N. (2013). A descriptive study: The qualitative transformation of citizenship and citizenship education Vatandaşlığın niteliksel dönüşümü ve vatandaşlık eğitimi üzerine bir betimleme çalışması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 105-118.
  11. Davies, I., Gorard, S. ve McGuinn, N. (2005). Citizenship education and character education: Similarities and contrasts. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(3), 341-358.
  12. Eidhof, B. B., ten Dam, G. T., Dijkstra, A. B., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2016). Consensus and contested citizenship education goals in Western Europe. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 11(2), 114-129.
  13. Evans, M. (2006). Educating for citizenship: What teachers say and what teachers do. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 410-435.
  14. Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art—so far. Qualitative health research, 13(7), 893-904.
  15. Fischman, G. E. ve Haas, E. (2012). Beyond idealized citizenship education: Embodied c