Journals / Ege Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2

Result of onlay mesh closure for patients having giant midline incisional hernias

Karın orta hat yerleşimli büyük insizyonel hernili hastalarda onlay mesh yerleştirilmesi sonuçlarımız

Pages
73–76
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Application of an onlay patch, before the closing of the fascia, to prevent tension is considered as a simple and dependable procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to assess the results of onlay propylene mesh reconstruction without closing up the fascia of midline incisional hernias larger than 10cm in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for incisional hernia fascial defects larger than 10 cm of the midline abdominal fascia closure, and on which the open onlay mesh technique had been used, were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Application of an onlay patch, before the closing of the fascia, to prevent tension is considered as a simple and dependable procedure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to assess the results of onlay propylene mesh reconstruction without closing up the fascia of midline incisional hernias larger than 10cm in this study. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for incisional hernia fascial defects larger than 10 cm of the midline abdominal fascia closure, and on which the open onlay mesh technique had been used, were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-one patients who could be reached by telephone, were included in the study and the control was determined. Factors such as gender, age, additional diseases, reasons for the first surgery, defect size, body mass index, primary-recurrence of incisional hernia, duration of hospital stay, postoperative complications and recurrence were investigated. Results: Thirteen patients (41.9%) who relapsed at least once had incisional hernias. Eighteen patients (58.1%) had an additional disease. Fascial defects were found in patients with an average diameter of 17.8 cm (10-50 cm), respectively. Additionally, five patients in the postoperative period (16.19%), seroma, one (3.2%), wound infection, one (3.2%), enterocutaneous fistula were confirmed. Six patients (19.4%) had recurrence and relapse, all within the first two years (mean 12.5 months, 3-24 months). Conclusion: Incisional hernia is a complication of abdominal surgery and is common and difficult. Additional problems, encountered especially for patients with large incisional hernias make the situation more complicated. For those patients, good preoperative preparation and the use of the patch are required. Application of an onlay patch, before the closing of the fascia, to prevent tension is considered as a simple and dependable procedure.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada karın orta hattında 10 cm’nin üzerinde defekti olup, fasya kapatılmadan onlay yama yerleştirilen hastaların sonuçlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: İnsizyonel herni nedeniyle ameliyat edilen hastalardan fasya defekti karın orta hattında olup, 10 cm’den büyük olan ve açık teknikle fasya kapatılmadan onlay yama yerleştirilmiş olan hastaların dosya kayıtları geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Telefonla ulaşılabilen 31 hasta poliklinik kontrolüne çağrıldı ve çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Cinsiyet, yaş, ek hastalıklar, ilk ameliyat nedeni, defekt çapı, vücut kitle oranı, primer-nüks insizyonel herni olması, hastanede yatış süresi, ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar ve nüks araştırıldı. Bulgular: Hastalardan 13’ü (%41.9) en az bir defa nüks etmiş insizyonel herniler idi. Hastaların 18’inde (%58.1) ek hastalık mevcuttu. Hastalardaki fasya defektlerinin ortalama çapı 17.8 cm (10-50 cm) idi. Postoperatif dönemde hastaların beşinde (%16.19) seroma, birinde (%3.2) yara yeri enfeksiyonu, birinde (%3.2) barsak-cilt fistülü saptandı. Altı hastada (%19.4) nüks görüldü ve nükslerin tamamının ilk iki yıl içerisinde (ortalama 12.5 ayda, 3-24 ay) geliştiği belirlendi. Sonuç: İnsizyonel herni karın cerrahisinin yaygın ve tamiri zor bir komplikasyonudur. Özellikle büyük insizyonel hernili hastalardaki ek problemler tablonun daha da karışık hale gelmesine neden olmaktadır. Bu hastalarda iyi bir preoperatif hazırlık ve ameliyatta yama kullanılması şarttır. Gerginliği önlemek için fasya kapatılmadan onlay yama konulması seçilebilecek tedavi yöntemlerindendir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, C., YAMAN, İ., YÜREKLİ, S., UĞUZ, A. (2012). Result of onlay mesh closure for patients having giant midline incisional hernias. Ege Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2, 73–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/220079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aksoy E, Çakmak A, Orozakunov E, Gürel M. Polipropilen meshlerin dokuya tespitinde kullanılan polipropilen dikiş, titanyum zımba ve nitinol çapa’nın kopma kuvvetlerinin karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 2009;62:39-43
  2. Coşkun M, Peker Y, Tatar F, Cin N, Kar H, Kahya MC. Karın orta hat kesi fıtığı onarımı ve nükse etki eden faktörler. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, 2009;31:244-249
  3. Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EGG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004;240:578-585
  4. Trivellini G, Bagni CM, Sollini A, Senni M, Leone S, Avesani EC. Repair of giant hernias using more prosthesis. Hernia 2001;5:124-128
  5. Bernard C, Polliand C, Mutelica L, Champault G. Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia 2007;11:315-320
  6. Baradaran H, Peyvandi H, Hallaj-Mofrad HR, Ahmadi-Amoli H, Yazdankhah-Konari A. Combined fascia and mesh closure of large incisional hernias. Arch Iranian Med 2008;11:282-285
  7. Poelman MM, Langenhorst BLAM, Schellekens JF, Schreurs WH. Modified onlay technique for the repair of the more complicated incisional hernias: Single-centre evaluation of a large cohort. Hernia 2010;14:369-374
  8. Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, et al. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2001;386:65-73
  9. Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Brit J Surg 2002;89:534-545
  10. Hamy A, Pessaux P, Mucci-Hennekinne S, Radriamananjo S, Regenet N, Arnaud JP. Surgical Treatment of Large Incisional hernias by an intraperitoneal dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft. J Am Coll Surgeons 2003; 196: 531 - 4
  11. Gök A, Topgül K, Güngör B, Bilgin M, Ulusoy AN, Kesim M, Malazgirt Z. Laparoskopik ventral fıtık onarımında kullanılan yamaların karın içi yapışıklıklarına etkisi: Sıçanlarda deneysel çalışma. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2007;23:99-105
  12. Cavallaro A, Menzo EL, Vita MD, et al. Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated fields. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:1928-1933
  13. Kingsnorth A. The management of incisional hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:252-260
  14. Lars Peter Holst Andersen LPH, Klein M, Gögenur İ, Rosenberg J. Long-term recurrence and complication rates after incisional hernia repair with the open onlay technique. BMC Surgery 2009;9:6
  15. Gleysteen JJ. Mesh-reinforced ven