Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Epiphytic Mosses Growing on Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana Trees in Ilgaz Forests of Turkey

Pages
170–175
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Negative effects of construction and tourist’ behaviors on the diversity of epiphytic bryophyte species in protected areas, such as national parks, were also mentioned

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We studied the diversity of epiphytic mosses in the Uludağ fir Abies nordmanniana (Stev.) Spach. subsp. bornmuellerina (Mattf.) Coode et Cullen consisting of pure and mixed type forests in Ilgaz Mountain National Park and Yenice Forests located in the south parts of the park.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After evaluating the collected mosses from Uludağ fir, we determined 38 epiphytic moss taxa and 26 genera belonging to 19 families.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Negative effects of construction and tourist’ behaviors on the diversity of epiphytic bryophyte species in protected areas, such as national parks, were also mentioned
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bryophytes · Mosses · Life-forms

Abstract

We studied the diversity of epiphytic mosses in the Uludağ fir Abies nordmanniana (Stev.) Spach. subsp. bornmuellerina (Mattf.) Coode et Cullen consisting of pure and mixed type forests in Ilgaz Mountain National Park and Yenice Forests located in the south parts of the park. After evaluating the collected mosses from Uludağ fir, we determined 38 epiphytic moss taxa and 26 genera belonging to 19 families. Dicranum and Orthotrichum genera were noticed as the richest corticolous moss species. According to the life-forms analysis, 8 different life forms were determined. Among them, tall turf (tT) was dominant. Weft (We) and Mat (Ma) were seen as the second life forms in the studied area. The samplings were made from tree base up to stand basal area. Generally, the effect of forestry practices was touched on composition, richness and cover of epiphytic bryophyte assemblages in managed and unmanaged forests. Negative effects of construction and tourist’ behaviors on the diversity of epiphytic bryophyte species in protected areas, such as national parks, were also mentioned

🔖

Cite This Article

ABAY, G., URSAVAŞ, S., ÇETIN, B. (2012). Epiphytic Mosses Growing on Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana Trees in Ilgaz Forests of Turkey. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 170–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/219916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abay G. 2001. Ilgaz Dağı Milli Parkı Karayosunu (Musci) Florası.DoktoraTezi,Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı, 148 s.,Ankara.
  2. Abay G., Çetin B. 2003.The Moss Flora (Musci) of Ilgaz Mountain National Park. Turk J Bot., 27, 321-332.
  3. Akman Y., Yurdakulol E., Demirörs M. 1983. The vegetation of the Ilgaz Mountains. Ecologia Mediterranea, 2, 137-165.
  4. Alataş M., Uyar G., Kara R., Ezer T. 2012a. The epiphytic bryophytes of Uludağ fir (Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana) on Abant Mountains/Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 5 (1), 69-75.
  5. AlataşM., Ezer T., Kara R., Uyar G. 2012b. Abantdağlarındaki Fagusorientalis Lipsky.(Doğu Kayını) ağaçlarının epifitik bryofitleri. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Özelsayı, 14: 98-105. Aude E.,Poulsen R.S. 2000. Influence of management on the species composition of epiphytic cryptogams in Danish Fagus forest. Appl. Veg. Sci., 3, 81–88. Barkman J.J. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Van Gorcum. Assen.628 pp. de Oliveira S.M., ter Steege H., Cornelissen J.H.C., Gradstein S.R. 2009. Niche assembly of epiphytic bryophyte communities in the Guyanas: a regional approach. Journal of Biogeography, 1- 9. Düzenli A., Kara R., Ezer T., Türkmen N. 2011. The bryophytes in the protected Quercus coccifera macchia in East Mediterranean Region of Turkey: their life-form, habitat and substratum relations. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 4 (2), 149-154.
  6. Ek T., Suško U., Auzinš R. 2002. Mežaudžuatslȇgas biotope in ventarizăcija. Metodika (In Latvian). Riga, 76 pp. Ezer T., Kara R., Atabay D. 2010. GüneyAmanosDağları’ndaki Quercus cerris L. ağaçlarının epifitik bryofitleri. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 3 (1), 139- 145. (Musa Dağı) Ezer T., Kara R., Düzenli, A. 2009. Succession, habitat affinity and life-forms of epiphytic bryophytes in Turkish oak (Quercus cerris L.) forests on Mount Musa. Ekoloji, 18 (72), 8-15.
  7. Friedel A., Oheimb G.V., Dengler J., Härdtle W. composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens- a comparison of managed and unmanaged beech forests in NE Germany. Feddes Reportorium, 117, 172-185. diversity and species Glime J. M. 2007. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume booksponsored Universityandthe International Association of Bryologists. Ecology. Technological Michigan Gradstein R., Culmsee H. 2010. Bryophyte diversity on tree trunks in montane forests of Central Sulawesi. Indonesia. Tropical Bryology, 31, 95-105.
  8. Hannerz M., Hånell B. 1997. Effects on