Journals / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Hiperemezis gravidarumu olan gebelerde ruhsal belirtiler, stresle başa çıkma tarzları, algılanan sosyal destek ve çift uyumu

Psychiatric Symptoms, Perceived Social Support, Coping Styles, and Dyadic Adjustment in Pregnant Women with Hyperemesis Gravidarum

Pages
307–316
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Psychosocial factors such as perceived social support, coping styles, and dyadic adjustment may contribute to the psychiatric symptoms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Psychiatric symptoms, perceived social support, coping styles, and dyadic adjustment in pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarumObjective: Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is a condition with severe nausea and vomiting, which is seen in 0.3-2% of pregnancies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, we aimed to investigate psychiatric symptoms in patients with HG and their relationships with perceived social support, coping styles, and dyadic adjustment.Method: Forty-eight women with HG hospitalized in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Inpatient Unit and 48 healthy pregnant women consulted to the Obstetric Outpatient Unit for their routine obstetric control were recruited for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Psychosocial factors such as perceived social support, coping styles, and dyadic adjustment may contribute to the psychiatric symptoms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Psychiatric symptoms, perceived social support, coping styles, and dyadic adjustment in pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarumObjective: Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is a condition with severe nausea and vomiting, which is seen in 0.3-2% of pregnancies. In addition to biological factors, psychosocial factors were also reported to play a role in the development of HG. However, the impact of psychosocial factors in HG has not been elucidated yet. In this research, we aimed to investigate psychiatric symptoms in patients with HG and their relationships with perceived social support, coping styles, and dyadic adjustment.Method: Forty-eight women with HG hospitalized in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Inpatient Unit and 48 healthy pregnant women consulted to the Obstetric Outpatient Unit for their routine obstetric control were recruited for the study. The subjects were evaluated with sociodemographic form, Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Ways of Coping Scale (WCS), and Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS). Results: All sociodemographic variables except nausea and vomiting history in previous pregnancies were similar in both groups. All subscales and global symptom index scores of SCL-90-R were higher; optimistic and submissive subscale scores of WCS were lower, satisfaction, consensus and total scores of DAS were higher in HG group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Psychiatric symptom levels are higher in women with HG compared to the controls. No difference for previous psychiatric history among groups shows that previous psychiatric history is not a predictor for HG. The psychiatric symptoms in HG is self-limiting and possibly due to HG symptoms. Psychosocial factors such as perceived social support, coping styles, and dyadic adjustment may contribute to the psychiatric symptoms.

Özet

Hiperemezis gravidarumu olan gebelerde ruhsal belirtiler, stresle başa çıkma tarzları, algılanan sosyal destek ve çift uyumuAmaç: Hiperemezis gravidarum (HG), şiddetli bulantı-kusma ile giden ve gebelerin yaklaşık %0.3-2'sinde görülen bir tablodur. Biyolojik etkenler yanında psikososyal etkenlerin de HG gelişiminde rol oynayabileceği bildirilmiştir. Fakat, HG'de psikososyal etkenlerin rolü tam olarak gösterilememiştir. Bu çalışmada HG ile ruhsal belirtiler ve bu belirtilerin algılanan sosyal destek, stresle başa çıkma tarzları ve çift uyumu arasındaki ilişkisini değerlendirmeyi hedefledik.Yöntem: Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği'nde HG tanısı ile yatırılan 48 gebe ile hastanenin Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum polikliniğine rutin doğum öncesi kontroller için başvuran 48 sağlıklı gebe çalışmaya alındı. Denekler, sosyodemografik form, Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90-R), Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği (ÇBASDÖ), Stresle Başaçıkma Tarzları Ölçeği (SBTÖ) ve Çift Uyum Ölçeği (ÇUÖ) ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Bulantı kusma öyküsü dışında tüm sosyodemografik değişkenler her iki grupta eşitti. HG grubunda kontrol grubuna göre SCL-90-R tüm alt ölçek ve genel belirti düzeyi puan ortalamaları yüksek (p<0.05); SBTÖ iyimser yaklaşım ve boyun eğici yaklaşım puan ortalamaları düşük (p<0.05); ÇUÖ tatmin ve fikirbirliği alt ölçekleri ile toplam ÇUÖ puan ortalamaları yüksekti (p<0.05). Sonuç: HG'de kontrollere göre ruhsal belirti düzeyleri yüksektir. Ruhsal hastalık öyküsü açısından gruplar arasında fark olmaması, ruhsal hastalık öyküsünün HG'nin öngörücüsü olmadığını gösterir. HG'de ruhsal belirtiler kendi kendini sınırlayıcıdır ve olasılıkla HG belirtilerine bağlıdır. Algılanan sosyal destek, stresle başa çıkma tarzları ve çift uyumu gibi psikososyal etkenler ruhsal belirtilere katkıda bulunabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, N., KALEM, M. N., BALCI, H., KALEM, Z., YÜCE, E., İLTEMUR, Z. C. D. (2016). Hiperemezis gravidarumu olan gebelerde ruhsal belirtiler, stresle başa çıkma tarzları, algılanan sosyal destek ve çift uyumu. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 307–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/218481

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Ismail SK, Kenny L. Review on hyperemesis gravidarum. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 21:755-769. [CrossRef] Niemeijer MN, Grooten IJ, Vos N, Bais JM, van der Post JA, Mol BW, Roseboom TJ, Leeflang MM, Painter RC. Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:1-15. [CrossRef] Abell TL, Riely CA. Hyperemesis gravidarum. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1992; 21:835-849. Bailit JL. Hyperemesis gravidarium: epidemiologic findings from a large cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:811-814. [CrossRef] Fell DB, Dodds L, Joseph KS, Allen VM, Butler B. Risk factors for hyperemesis gravidarum requiring hospital admission during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:277-284. [CrossRef] Sandven I, Abdelnoor M, Nesheim BI, Melby KK. Helicobacter pylori infection and hyperemesis gravidarum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88:1190-1200. [CrossRef] Lee NM, Saha S. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2011; 40:309-334. [CrossRef] Swallow BL, Lindow SW, Masson EA, Hay DM. Psychological health in early pregnancy: relationship with nausea and vomiting. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24:28-32. [CrossRef] Tan PC, Vani S, Lim BK, Omar SZ. Anxiety and depression in hyperemesis gravidarum: prevalence, risk factors and correlation with clinical severity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 149:153-158. [CrossRef] Uguz F, Gezginc K, Kayhan F, Cicek E, Kantarci AH. Is hyperemesis gravidarum associated with mood, anxiety and personality disorders: a case-control study? Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2012; 34:398-402. [CrossRef] Seng JS, Schrot JA, van De Ven C, Liberzon I. Service use data analysis of pre-pregnancy psychiatric and somatic diagnoses in women with hyperemesis gravidarum. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 28:209-217. [CrossRef] Verberg MF, Gillott DJ, Al-Fardan N, Grudzinskas JG. Hyperemesis gravidarum, a literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11:527-539. [CrossRef] Simpson SW, Goodwin TM, Robins SB, Rizzo AA, Howes RA, Buckwalter DK, Buckwalter JG. Psychological factors and hyperemesis gravidarum. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2001; 10:471-477. [CrossRef] Heaney CA, Israel BA. Social networks and social support: In Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (editors). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. Fourth ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008, 189-210.
  2. Liu W, Li Z, Ling Y, Cai T. Core self-evaluati