Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

The analysis of surgical Treatment modalities applied for upper urinary tract stone diseases in the state Hospital of Mus, urology clinic

Muş Devlet Hastanesi üroloji kliniğinde üst üriner sistem taşı cerrahi girişimlerinin analizi

Pages
206–209
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Open surgery is rarely preferred only in selected cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, the surgical approaches that were applied for the upper urinary tract stones in The State Hospital of Mus Urology Clinic, were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 1108 patients who underwent surgery for upper urinary tract stones in The State Hospital of Mus Urology Clinic between February 2008 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Open surgery is rarely preferred only in selected cases.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, the surgical approaches that were applied for the upper urinary tract stones in The State Hospital of Mus Urology Clinic, were investigated. Materials and Methods: 1108 patients who underwent surgery for upper urinary tract stones in The State Hospital of Mus Urology Clinic between February 2008 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were referred to ESWL treatment were excluded from the study. Results: The mean age was 43.7 ( 19-72 ) years. 472 patients (42.6%) were women and 636 of the sample (57.4%) were male. Endoscopic surgery was applied to 1071 (96.7%) patients [URS was performed to 962 (89.8%) patients, PCNL was performed to 109 (10.2%) patients,], and open surgery was performed to 37 (3.3%) patients [ureterolithotomy was performed to 11 (29,7%) patients, pyelolithotomy was performed to 24 (64.9%) patients and nephrolithotomy was performed to 2 (5.4%) patients]. Conclusion: In our clinic endoscopic surgery (URS for ureteral stones, PCNL for kidney stones) is preferred as the primary treatment modality for the treatment of upper urinary tract stone disease. Open surgery is rarely preferred only in selected cases.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Muş Devlet Hastanesi üroloji kliniğinin üst üriner sistem taşlarına uyguladığı cerrahi girişimler incelenmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Muş Devlet Hastanesi üroloji kliniğinde Şubat 2008 ile Şubat 2011 yılları arasında üst üriner sistem taşları için cerrahi girişim uygulanan 1108 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. ESWL tedavisine sevk edilen hastalar çalışma dışında bırakıldı. Bulgular: Kliniğimizde taş cerrahisi uygulanan 1108 hastanın yaş ortalaması 43,7 (19-72) dir. Bu hastaların 472’si (%42,6) kadın, 636’sı (%57,4) erkektir. Toplam 1071 (%96,7) hastaya endoskopik cerrahi [962 (%89,8) hastaya URS, 109 (%10,2) hastaya PCNL] , 37 (%3,3) hastaya ise açık cerrahi [11 (%29,7) hastaya üreterolitotomi, 24 (%64,9) hastaya piyelolitotomi, 2 (%5,4) hastaya nefrolitotomi] uygulanmıştır. Sonuç: Kliniğimiz üst üriner sistem taşlarında öncelikli olarak endoskopik cerrahiyi (üreter taşlarında URS, böbrek taşlarında PCNL) tercih etmektedir. Açık cerrahi kliniğimizde sadece seçilmiş nadir vakalarda tercih edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKÖSE, A., YÜKSEL, M. B., ÇİLOĞLU, M., ALTOK, M. (2012). The analysis of surgical Treatment modalities applied for upper urinary tract stone diseases in the state Hospital of Mus, urology clinic. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 206–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/218306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis. Arch It Urol 1996; 68: 203-49
  2. Hesse A, Siener R. Current aspects of epidemiology and nutrition in urinary stones. World J Urol 1997; 15: 165-71
  3. Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MA, Kaufman SR at al. Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: A meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 368: 1171-9
  4. Kim HH, Jo MK, Kwak C, Park SK. Prevalence and epidemiologic characteristics of urolithiasis in Seoul, Korea. Urology 2002; 59: 517-21
  5. Akıncı M, Esen T, Tellaloğlu S. Urinary stone disease in Turkey: an updated epidemiological study. Eur Urol 1991; 20: 200-3
  6. Muslumanoglu AY, Binbay M, Yuruk E at al. Updated epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in Turkey. I: Changing characteristics of urolithiasis. Urol Res 2011; 39: 309-14
  7. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al. Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasisinitial results. J Urol 2001; 166: 2072-80
  8. Peschel R, Janetschek G, Bartsch G. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: A prospective randomized study. J Urol 1999; 162: 1909
  9. Hendrikx AJ, Strijbos WE, de Knijff DW et al. Treatment for estended-mid and distal ureteral stones; SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study. J. Endourol 1999; 13: 727-33
  10. Biri H, Küpeli B, Isen K, Sinik Z, Karaoğlan U, Bozkirli I. Treatment of lower ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or intracorporeal lithotripsy? J Endourol 1999; 13: 77-81
  11. Küpeli B, Biri H, Isen K at al. Treatment of ureteral stones: comparasion of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourologic alternatives. Eur Urol 1998; 34: 474-9
  12. Matlaga BR. Contemporary surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol 2009; 181: 2152-6
  13. Güner ND, Alp T, Aydın A, Demir M, Aydın S. Treatment modalities for the upper urinary system stone disease in Turkey. Turkish J Urology 2010; 36: 369-74
  14. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology 2010
  15. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al. American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc; European Association of Urology. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 1610-31
  16. Lotan Y, Gettman MT, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis. J