Journals / International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Improved Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Bayesian Optimization

Pages
121–130
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental results showedthat the Bayesian optimization-based K-Nearest Neighbor performs better than other machine learning algorithms under the hold-out data division protocol with an accuracy of 95.833%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer and is the second main cause of cancer death in females.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, a performance comparison of machine learning algorithms including Support Vector Machines, Decision Trees, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Ensemble Classifiers was performedon a dataset consisting of routine blood analysis combined with anthropometric measurements to diagnose breast cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental results showedthat the Bayesian optimization-based K-Nearest Neighbor performs better than other machine learning algorithms under the hold-out data division protocol with an accuracy of 95.833%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer and is the second main cause of cancer death in females. Early detection of breast cancer is crucial for the survival of a patient as well as for the quality of life throughout cancer treatment. Theaim of this study is to develop improved machine learning models for early diagnosis of breast cancer with high accuracy. In this context, a performance comparison of machine learning algorithms including Support Vector Machines, Decision Trees, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Ensemble Classifiers was performedon a dataset consisting of routine blood analysis combined with anthropometric measurements to diagnose breast cancer. Neighborhood component analysis was applied as a feature selection method to reveal relevant biomarkers that can be used in breast cancer prediction. In order to assess the performance of each proposed classifier model, two different data division procedures such as hold-out and 10-fold cross-validation were employed. Bayesian Optimization algorithm was applied to all classifiers for the maximizing the prediction accuracy. Different performance criteria such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F-measure were used to measure the success of each classifier. Experimental results showedthat the Bayesian optimization-based K-Nearest Neighbor performs better than other machine learning algorithms under the hold-out data division protocol with an accuracy of 95.833%. The results obtained in this study may provide a new perspective on the application of improved machine learning techniques for the early detection of breast cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, Z. (2020). Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Improved Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Bayesian Optimization. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 121–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/218202

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. W. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) report, “Latest global cancer data: Cancer burden rises to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths in 2018,” Int. Agency Res. Cancer, no. September, pp. 13–15, 2018. [2]S. Sapate, S. Talbar, A. Mahajan, N. Sable, S. Desai, and M. Thakur, “Breast cancer diagnosis using abnormalities on ipsilateral views of digital mammograms,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., pp. 1–16, 2019, https://doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2019.04.008. [3]Z. Ceylan and E. Pekel, “Comparison of Multi-Label Classification Methods for Prediagnosis of Cervical Cancer,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng., vol. 5, no. 4 SE-Research Article, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.18201/ijisae.2017533896. [4]B. K. Singh, “Determining relevant biomarkers for prediction of breast cancer using anthropometric and clinical features: A comparative investigation in machine learning paradigm,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 393–409, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2019.03.001. [5]J. Gong, X. Bai, D. -a. Li, J. Zhao, and X. Li, “Prognosis Analysis of Heart Failure Based on Recurrent Attention Model,” IRBM, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2019.08.002. [6]M. Toğaçar, B. Ergen, and Z. Cömert, “A Deep Feature Learning Model for Pneumonia Detection Applying a Combination of mRMR Feature Selection and Machine Learning Models,” IRBM, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2019.10.006. [7]R. D. Badgujar and P. J. Deore, “Hybrid Nature Inspired SMO-GBM Classifier for Exudate Classification on Fundus RetinalImages,” IRBM, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 69–77, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2019.02.003. [8]A. Asuncion and D. Newman, “UCI machine learning repository.” 2007. [9]S. Liu et al., “Quantitative analysis of breast cancer diagnosis using a probabilistic modelling approach,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 92, no. November 2017, pp. 168–175, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.11.014. [10]R. N. Das, Y. Lee, S. Mukherjee, and S. Oh, “Relationship of body mass index with diabetes and breast cancer biomarkers,” vol. 9, pp. 1–6, 2019. [11]J. H. Kang, B. Y. Yu, and D. S. Youn, “Relationship of serum adiponectin and resistin levels with breast cancer risk,” J. Korean Med. Sci., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 117–121, 2007, doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.1.117. [12]H. L. Hwa et al., “Prediction of breast cancer and lymph node metastatic status with tumour markers using logistic regression models,” J. Eval. Clin. Pract., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 275–280, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.20