SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Art Education and Expertise An Eye Tracking Study

Sanat Eğitimi ve Uzmanlık: Bir Göz İzleme Çalışması

Banu CANGÖZ
Bahadir OKTAY
Necla RÜZGAR KAYIRAN
Serap EMMUNGİL KARAMANOĞLU
Pages
259–271
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, artwork analysis grades of the experts were deter-mined to be higher at a statistically significant level in comparison with the non-experts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The impact of education and expertise in art on the process of examining a work of art has been studied in the present study via eye tracking method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main purpose of the study was to compare a group of experts and non-experts in art with regard to eye tracking measurements, artwork analyses and recall performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, artwork analysis grades of the experts were deter-mined to be higher at a statistically significant level in comparison with the non-experts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Göz izleme · seçici dikkat · uzmanlık

Abstract

The impact of education and expertise in art on the process of examining a work of art has been studied in the present study via eye tracking method. The main purpose of the study was to compare a group of experts and non-experts in art with regard to eye tracking measurements, artwork analyses and recall performance. In this research, expert and non-expert groups were compared in terms of eye tracking measurements, heat maps, artwork analysis and the recall performances. Heat maps were demonstrated that experts viewed Early Renaissance and Fauvism movements, artworks more while non-experts viewed Fauvist artworks more in comparison with AOIs. However, it was indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between the expert and non-expert groups for each artwork about eye metrics and recall performance during art-work analysis. On the other hand, artwork analysis grades of the experts were deter-mined to be higher at a statistically significant level in comparison with the non-experts.

Özet

Bu araştırmada sanat eğitimi ve sanatta uzmanlaşmanın sanat eseri inceleme süreci üzerindeki rolü göz izleme tekniği kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın temel amacı, sanat eseri inceleme esnasında sanatta uzman grup ile uzman olmayan grubu göz izleme ölçümleri, eser inceleme ve hatırlama performansı açısından karşılaştırmaktır. Araştırmada profesyonel resim sanatçılarından oluşan uzman grup ile sanat eğitimi almamış iki grup, üç farklı sanat dönemini (Erken Rönesans, Modern, Çağdaş) yansıtan resimleri incelerken göz izleme ölçümleri; ısı haritaları, jüri tarafından belirlenen eser inceleme puanları ve hatırladıkları detay miktarı açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. Isı haritaları, Erken Rönesans ve çağdaş döneme ait eserlerde uzmanların, modern döneme ait eserde ise uzman olmayanların AOI’lere daha fazla baktığını göstermiştir. Buna karşın, her üç eser için de uzman olan ve olmayan grup arasında resim inceleme esnasındaki göz izleme metrikleri ve hatırlama performansı açısından anlamlı fark olmadığını gösterilmiştir. Öte yandan, uzman grubun eser inceleme puanları uzman olmayanlardan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANGÖZ, B., OKTAY, B., KAYIRAN, N. R., KARAMANOĞLU, S. E. (2021). Art Education and Expertise An Eye Tracking Study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 259–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/218086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Arnheim, R. (2007). Visual thinking. (2nd ed). 35th Anniversary Printing: University of California Press.
  2. Brinkmann, H., Commare, L., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2014). Abstract art as a universal language?. Leonardo, 47(3), 256-257. doi: 10.1162/LEON_a_00767 Birch, J. & McKeever, L. M. (1991). Survey of the accuracay of new pseudoisochromatic plates. Ophtalmic and Physiological Optics, 13, 35-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00423.x Borji, A., & Itti, L. (2014). Defending Yarbus: Eye movements reveal observers' task. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 29-29. doi: 10.1167/14.3.29 Cartwright-Finch, U. & Lavie, N. (2007). The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102, 321-340. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.002. Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Einhäuser, W., Spain, M., & Perona, P. (2008). Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. Journal of Vision, 8(14), 18-18. doi: 10.1167/8.14.18 Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Expertise. Current 0Biology, 24(11), 508-510. doi: 10.1016 /j.cub.2014.04.013 Francuz, P., Zaniewski, I., Augustynowicz, P., Kopiś, N., & Jankowski, T. (2018). Eye movement correlates of expertise in visual arts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 87. doi: 10.3389/ fnhum. 2018.00087 George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.) Boston: Pearson. Gombrich, E. H. (1992). Art and illusion (11st ed.). New York: Princeton University Press.
  3. Johnson, M. G., Muday, J. A., & Schirillo, J. A. (2010). When viewing variations in paintings by Mondrian, aesthetic preferences correlate with pupil size. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 161-167. doi: 10.1037/a0018155 Kesner, L., Grygarová, D., Fajnerová, I., Lukavský, J., Nekovářová, T., Tintěra, J.,. & Horáček, J. (2018). Perception of direct vs. averted gaze in portrait paintings: An fMRI and eye-tracking study. Brain and Cognition, 125, 88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.004 Kuchinke, L., Trapp, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Leder, H. (2009). Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 156-163. doi: 10.1037/a0014464 Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (2), 75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004 Leppert, R. (1996). Art and the committed eye: The cultural func