Journals / Acta Medica / 2021 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Reproductive Factors and Breast Cancer Prognosis: The Possible Role of Cesarean Delivery

Pages
29–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, our findings indicated that patients with history of cesarean delivery were diagnosed with breast cancer at younger ages, and after a shorter time interval since last parity (p<0.001).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the possible associations between tumor pathological characteristics and reproductive factors in women with breast cancer, including method of child delivery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed as breast cancer between January 2012 and April 2013 in Ankara University Hospitals who had at least one full term pregnancy were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, our findings indicated that patients with history of cesarean delivery were diagnosed with breast cancer at younger ages, and after a shorter time interval since last parity (p<0.001).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To evaluate the possible associations between tumor pathological characteristics and reproductive factors in women with breast cancer, including method of child delivery. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed as breast cancer between January 2012 and April 2013 in Ankara University Hospitals who had at least one full term pregnancy were included. Data upon pathological prognostic features of tumors and reproductive history of patients were obtained from patient files. Results: 434 patients with breast cancer were included. Mean age at the time of breast cancer diagnosis was 49.2±10.7 years. History of at least one cesarean delivery was present in 17% of the patients (n=75). Axillary lymph node positivity was related to younger age at first full-term pregnancy (p=0.018), and higher number of parities (p=0.001) in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer patients. Although extracapsular invasion was related to shorter time interval since last parity to cancer diagnosis in the whole population (p=0.029), this association disappeared when patients were categorized according to ER status. However, in ER+ patients, history of cesarean delivery was associated with extracapsular invasion (p=0.023). Also, our findings indicated that patients with history of cesarean delivery were diagnosed with breast cancer at younger ages, and after a shorter time interval since last parity (p<0.001). Tumor size (p=0.001), grade (p=0.046), axillary lymph node positivity (p=0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p<0.001), and shorter duration of time since last parity to breast cancer diagnosis (p=0.029) were indicators of metastatic disease. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that history of cesarean delivery may be associated with poor prognosis in ER+ patients with breast cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZ, S. H., UTKAN, G. (2021). Reproductive Factors and Breast Cancer Prognosis: The Possible Role of Cesarean Delivery. Acta Medica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 29–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/217948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019
  2. 69(6):438-51. Epub 2019/10/03. [2]World Health Organization. Breast Cancer: Prevention and Control. Access Date: 2021/01/20 https://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/#:~:text=Introduction,and%20adoption%20of%20western%20lifestyles. [3]Bastiaannet E, Liefers GJ, de Craen AJ, et al. Breast cancer in elderly compared to younger patients in the Netherlands: stage at diagnosis, treatment and survival in 127,805 unselected patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010
  3. 124(3):801-7. Epub 2010/04/30. [4]Oven Ustaalioglu BB, Bilici A, Kefeli U, et al. Does the metastatic lymph node ratio influence the disease-free survival of patients with breast cancer: single-center experiences. Oncology. 2010
  4. 79(1-2):105-11. Epub 2010/11/23. [5]de Boer M, van Dijck JA, Bult P, et al. Breast cancer prognosis and occult lymph node metastases, isolated tumor cells, and micrometastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010
  5. 102(6):410-25. Epub 2010/03/02. [6]Zhao S, Ma D, Xiao Y, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognoses of different histologic types of triple-negative breast cancer: A large population-based analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018
  6. 44(4):420-8. Epub 2018/02/13. [7]Rakha EA, Martin S, Lee AH, et al. The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2012
  7. 118(15):3670-80. Epub 2011/12/20. [8]National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Prevention (PDQ): Health Professional Version. Access Date: 2021/01/20 https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/hp/breast-prevention-pdq#_558. [9]Ghafouri-Fard S, Taheri M, Omrani MD, et al. Expression of long noncoding RNAs in breast cancer in relation to reproductive factors and tumor characteristics. J Cell Biochem. 2019
  8. 120(8):13965-73. Epub 2019/04/09. [10]McCullough LE, Collin LJ, Conway K, et al. Reproductive characteristics are associated with gene-specific promoter methylation status in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019
  9. 19(1):926. Epub 2019/09/20. [11]Orgeas CC, Hall P, Rosenberg LU, et al. The influence of menstrual risk factors on tumor characteristics and survival in postmenopausal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2008
  10. 10(6):R107. Epub 2008/12/18. [12]Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Thoresen S, et al. Clinical stage of breast cancer by parity, age at birth, and time since birth: a progressive effect of pregnancy hormones? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006
  11. 15(1):65-9. Epub 2006/01/26. [13]Alsaker MD, Opdahl S, Asvo