Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Preparation of Final Yield Harvest Plans by Using Goal Programming

Son Hâsılat Kesim Planlarının Amaç Programlama Kullanılarak Hazırlanması

Pages
116–141
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The method applied in the study can be used in the preparation of the final yield harvest plans and detailed silviculture plans of red pine forests.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the use of goal programming in preparing the final yield harvest plans of the even-aged high forests was examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective function of the linear goal programming model used in the study minimized deviations from the annual regeneration area (82.84 ha) and the annual final yield harvest volume (15.692 m3) targets.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The method applied in the study can be used in the preparation of the final yield harvest plans and detailed silviculture plans of red pine forests.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:son hâsılat kesim planı · amaç programlama · komşuluk

Abstract

In this study, the use of goal programming in preparing the final yield harvest plans of the even-aged high forests was examined. The objective function of the linear goal programming model used in the study minimized deviations from the annual regeneration area (82.84 ha) and the annual final yield harvest volume (15.692 m3) targets. The constraints of the study were that adjacent stand pairs with a total of 25 ha or more could not be regenerated together during the green-up period (3 years), and the adjacent stand pairs totaling 6 ha or less had to be regenerated in the same year. The model was solved for 11 different scenarios using Lingo 18. In scenario 3, which provided the best results, when the area and volume deviations are evaluated together, the total deviation from the annual regeneration area target was 1.64 ha, in other words, only 0.20% of the periodic regeneration area. The total deviation from the annual final yield harvest volume target was only 303 m3 (0.19% of the periodic final yield harvest volume). The method applied in the study can be used in the preparation of the final yield harvest plans and detailed silviculture plans of red pine forests.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, aynıyaşlı koru ormanlarının son hâsılat kesim planlarının hazırlanmasında amaç programlamanın kullanımı incelenmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan doğrusal amaç programlama modelinin amaç satırı, yıllık gençleştirme sahası (82,84 ha) ve yıllık son hâsılat etası (15.692 m3) hedeflerinden sapmaları en aza indirmektedir. Çalışmanın kısıtlarını ise toplamları 25 ha veya daha fazla olan komşu bölmecik çiftlerinin erteleme süresi (3 yıl) boyunca birlikte gençleştirilmemesi ile toplamları 6 ha veya daha az olan komşu bölmecik çiftlerinin aynı yıl gençleştirilmesi oluşturmaktadır. Model, Lingo 18 kullanılarak 11 farklı senaryo için çözülmüştür. Alan ve hacim sapmaları birlikte değerlendirildiğinde en iyi sonucu veren senaryo 3’te, yıllık gençleştirme alanı hedefinden toplam sapma 1,64 ha, diğer bir deyişle periyodik gençleştirme alanının sadece %0.20’si kadardır. Yıllık son hâsılat etası hedefinden toplam sapma ise 303 m3tür (periyodik son hâsılat etasının %0,19’u kadar). Çalışmada uygulanan yöntem özellikle kızılçam ormanlarının son hâsılat kesim planlarının ve detay silvikültür planlarının hazırlanmasında rahatlıkla kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİ, M. (2021). Preparation of Final Yield Harvest Plans by Using Goal Programming. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 116–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/217803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aldea, J., Martínez-Peña, F., Romero, C. & Diaz-Balteiro, L. (2014). Participatory goal programming in forest management: An application integrating several ecosystem services. Forests, 5(12), 3352-3371.
  2. Alp, S. (2008). Doğrusal Hedef Programlama Yönteminin Otobüsle Kent İçi Toplu Taşıma Sisteminde Kullanılması, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Yıl:7 Sayı:13, 73-91.
  3. Augustynczik, A.L.D., Arce, J.E. & da Silva, A.C.L. (2016). Aggregating forest harvesting activities in forest plantations through integer linear programming and goal programming. Journal of Forest Economics, 24, 72-81.
  4. Bagdon, B.A., Huang, C.-H. & Dewhurst, S. (2016). Managing for ecosystem services in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests using a novel simulation-to-optimization methodology. Ecological Modelling, 324, 11-27.
  5. Bertomeu, M. & Romero, C. (2001). Managing forest biodiversity: a zero-one goal programming approach. Agricultural Systems, 68, 197-213.
  6. Bertomeu, M. & Romero, C. (2002). Forest management optimization models and habitat diversity: a goal programming approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 1175-1184.
  7. Bell, E.F. (1975). Problems with goal programming on a national forest planning unit. Systems Analysis and Forest Resource Management, 119-126,
  8. Athens, Georgia. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. (1961). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming: Vol 1. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Chen, Y.-T. & Chang, C.-T. (2014). Multi-coefficient goal programming in thinning schedules to increase carbon sequestration and improve forest structure. Annals of Forest Science, 71(8), 907-915.
  9. Chen, Y.-T., Zheng, C. & Chang, C.-T. (2011). 3-level MCGP: An efficient algorithm for MCGP in solving multi-forest management problems. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 26(5), 457-465.
  10. Cyr, G., Raulier, F., Fortin, D. & Pothier, D. (2017). Using operating area size and adjacency constraints to mitigate the effects of harvesting activities on boreal caribou habitat. Landscape Ecology, 32(2), 377-395.
  11. Dahlin, B. & Sallnäs, O. (1993). Harvest scheduling under adjacency constraints-a case study from the Swedish sub-alpine region. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 281-290.
  12. De Kluyver, C.A. (1979). An exploration of various goal programming formulations - with application to advertising media scheduling. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(2), 167-171.
  13. Demirci, M. (2018). Orman Amenajman Planlamasında Karışık Tamsayılı Ama