SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Approach to the Concept of Literacy for Information Systems Used in the Business Areas of and Daily Studies

ÖZEL SEBETCİ
Pages
2691–2697
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further research is needed to analyse the feasibility of ISL to much larger environments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – Information systems are a very important part of information technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – The ISL is a scale of literacy consisting of 8 items developed to assess the unified knowledge, comfort and perceived skills of individuals in the process of finding, evaluating and implementing information systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further research is needed to analyse the feasibility of ISL to much larger environments.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – Information systems are a very important part of information technology. Therefore, the use of information systems will be a distinctive feature for humanity in the future as it is today. This situation reveals the discussion of the concept of information systems literacy. In this study, the Information Systems Literacy (ISL) model is designed to assess and evaluate the perceived skills of individuals regarding the use of information systems. Design/methodology/approach – The ISL is a scale of literacy consisting of 8 items developed to assess the unified knowledge, comfort and perceived skills of individuals in the process of finding, evaluating and implementing information systems. Findings – Principal component analysis has made a single-factor solution (57% of the variance). Among 8 items, factor loads vary between.62 and 85. Discussion – ISL is accepted as an assessment tool for evaluating consumer comfort and ability to use information technology in repeating administrations by capturing the concept of information systems literacy in a reliable and consistent manner. Further research is needed to analyse the feasibility of ISL to much larger environments.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEBETCİ, Ö. (2019). Approach to the Concept of Literacy for Information Systems Used in the Business Areas of and Daily Studies. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 2691–2697. https://ajindex.com/articles/217756

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Probert, E. (2009). Information literacy skills: Teacher understandings and practice. Computers & Education, 53(1), 24-33.
  2. Guo, Y. R., & Goh, D. H. L. (2016). Evaluation of affective embodied agents in an information literacy game. Computers & Education, 103, 59-75.
  3. Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 118, 107-119.
  4. Chu, X., Luo, X. R., & Chen, Y. (2018). A systematic review on cross-cultural information systems research: Evidence from the last decade. Information & Management. Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191-210.
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Bandura, A.(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman, NY. Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218-259.
  6. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17-66).
  7. Springer, Dordrecht. Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education, 58(2), 797-807.
  8. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Psychology Press.
  9. Ferrari, A., Brečko, B. N., & Punie, Y. (2014). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. eLearning Papers, (38), 1. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., & Friedman, T. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study international report. Springer. Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., & Ainley, J. (2013). International computer and information literacy study: Assessment framework. Horton, F. W. (2008). Understanding information literacy: A primer. Paris: UNESCO Kurbanoğlu, S. S. (2010). Bilgi okuryazarlığı: Kavramsal bir analiz. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 24(4), 723-747.
  10. Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2008). New literacies for the knowledge society. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 23