Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Sustainability Indices in the Financial Markets, Performance and Intraday Volatility Analysis: The Case of Turkey

Pages
3190–3203
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, when intraday volatility is examined, it was found that XUSRD was more volatile than the market indices XUTUM and XTUMY.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – In the financial markets, especially the institutional investors' interest in funds and portfolios composed of sustainable companies accelerated the formation of sustainability indices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, this study aims to examine the sustainability indices in financial markets and compare the performance of Borsa İstanbul Sustainability Index (XUSRD) with benchmark indices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, when intraday volatility is examined, it was found that XUSRD was more volatile than the market indices XUTUM and XTUMY.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – In the financial markets, especially the institutional investors' interest in funds and portfolios composed of sustainable companies accelerated the formation of sustainability indices. In this context, this study aims to examine the sustainability indices in financial markets and compare the performance of Borsa İstanbul Sustainability Index (XUSRD) with benchmark indices. In this study, unlike other studies in the literature, not only return performance and risk, but also intraday volatility were analyzed. Design/methodology/approach – The research period is between November 4, 2014 and October 31, 2018. The performance of the XUSRD was compared with market indices (XU100, XUTUM and XTUMY) and the Corporate Governance Index (XKURY). Average daily return of indices were used for return performance. Risk factor was analyzed on models established according to CAPM. Intraday volatility was calculated following to the method proposed by Parkinson (1980) and adapted by Corrado and Truong (2007). Findings – Research findings show that average daily return of XUSRD index is not different from market indices and XKURY index. However, when intraday volatility is examined, it was found that XUSRD was more volatile than the market indices XUTUM and XTUMY. In the three regression models established according to CAPM, Jensen α values were not significant, however, β values of XUSRD were found to be higher than 1 and statistically significant. Discussion – Borsa İstanbul Sustainability Index does not provide an advantage to investors in terms of return, risk and volatility. The results can be interpreted that the concept of socially responsible investment is not adequately settled in Turkey

🔖

Cite This Article

LEVENT, C. E. (2019). Sustainability Indices in the Financial Markets, Performance and Intraday Volatility Analysis: The Case of Turkey. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 3190–3203. https://ajindex.com/articles/217656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ang, W. R. (2015). Sustainable investment in Korea does not catch a cold when the United States sneezes. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(1-2), 16-26.
  2. Ang, W. R., & Weber, O. (2018). The market efficiency of socially responsible investment in Korea. Journal of Global Responsibility, 9(1), 96-110.
  3. Belghitar, Y., Clark, E., & Deshmukh, N. (2014). Does it pay to be ethical? Evidence from the FTSE4Good. Journal of Banking & Finance, 47, 54-62.
  4. Benson, C. C., Gupta, N. J., & Mateti, R. S. (2010). Does Risk Reduction Mitigate the Costs of Going Green? An Empirical Study of Sustainable Investing. Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, 2, 7-25.
  5. BİST. (2014). Şirketler İçin Sürdürülebilirlik Rehberi. Retrieved from https://www.borsaistanbul.com/data/kilavuzlar/surdurulebilirlik-rehberi.pdf
  6. BİST. (2015). BIST Sustainable Index Research Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.borsaistanbul.com/en/indices/bist-stock-indices/bist-sustainability-index
  7. BİST. (2017). BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi Temel Kuralları. Retrieved from http://www.borsaistanbul.com/docs/default-source/endeksler/bist-sustainability-index-groundrules.pdf?sfvrsn=8 BİST. (2019a). BİST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi. Retrieved from https://www.borsaistanbul.com/endeksler/bistpay-endeksleri/surdurulebilirlik-endeksi BIST. (2019b). Borsa Istanbul. Retrieved from http://www.borsaistanbul.com/en
  8. Cavalcante, L. R., Bruni, A. L., & Costa, F. J. (2007). Sustentabilidade Empresarial e Desempenho Corporativo: Uma Análise do Mercado Brasileiro de Ações. XXXI Encontro da ANPAD. Rio de Janeiro. Consolandi, C., Jaiswal-Dale, A., Poggiani, E., & Vercelli, A. (2009). Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.87, 185- 197. Corrado, C., & Truong, C. (2007). Forecasting stock index volatility: Comparing implied volatility and the intraday high-low price range. The Journal of Financial Research, 30(2), 201-215.
  9. Cunha, F. A., & Samanez, C. P. (2013). Performance Analysis of Sustainable Investments in the Brazilian Stock Market: A Study About the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE). Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 19- 36. Çıtak, L., & Ersoy, E. (2016). Firmaların BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksine Alınmasına Yatırımcı Tepkisi:Olay Çalışması Ve Ortalama Testleri İle Bir Analiz. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 43-57.
  10. DiBartolomeo, D., & Kurtz, L. (1999). Managing Risk Exposures of Socially Scre