SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

The Impact of Workplace Ostracism on Stress and Employee Engagement

Asif Hussain SAMO
Shakir KHAN
Nouma ALİ
Sarfaraz ALİ
Pages
3471–3484
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion – The theoretical implication of the research is that our results reinforced the past theories and the practical implication that ostracism decreases the productivity of employees, for increasing the productivity of employees, the organization should decrease the level of ostracism at the workplace, and it will be beneficial for the banking sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – This research aims to find out the impact of workplace ostracism on stress and employee engagement; this study is beneficial for organizations specific to Banking Sectors so that they can manage their employees correctly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – Quantitative research method was used in this research followed with non-probability convenient sampling with the sample size of 330 of employees working in the banking sectors located in Karachi both Public & Private, the instruments for measuring continuous variable are adopted from previous research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion – The theoretical implication of the research is that our results reinforced the past theories and the practical implication that ostracism decreases the productivity of employees, for increasing the productivity of employees, the organization should decrease the level of ostracism at the workplace, and it will be beneficial for the banking sector.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – This research aims to find out the impact of workplace ostracism on stress and employee engagement; this study is beneficial for organizations specific to Banking Sectors so that they can manage their employees correctly. Design/methodology/approach – Quantitative research method was used in this research followed with non-probability convenient sampling with the sample size of 330 of employees working in the banking sectors located in Karachi both Public & Private, the instruments for measuring continuous variable are adopted from previous research. Findings – We have found by testing our hypotheses that there is a significant positive impact of Ostracism on Stress, on the other hand, it has been found that there is a negative impact of Ostracism on Employee Engagement. Discussion – The theoretical implication of the research is that our results reinforced the past theories and the practical implication that ostracism decreases the productivity of employees, for increasing the productivity of employees, the organization should decrease the level of ostracism at the workplace, and it will be beneficial for the banking sector.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAMO, A. H., KHAN, S., ALİ, N., ALİ, S. (2019). The Impact of Workplace Ostracism on Stress and Employee Engagement. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 3471–3484. https://ajindex.com/articles/217641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Attell, B. K., Kummerow Brown, K., & Treiber, L. A. (2017). Workplace bullying, perceived job stressors, and psychological distress: Gender and race differences in the stress process. Social Science Research, 65, 210–221. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.02.001 Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E., Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2010). Creating an engaged workforce: findings from the Kingston employee engagement consortium project. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-200.
  2. Bang, O. Y., Saver, J. L., Kim, S. J., Kim, G. M., Chung, C. S., Ovbiagele, B.,. & Liebeskind, D. S. (2011). Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 42(3), 693-699.
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997).
  4. Carter-Sowell, A. R., Chen, Z., & Williams, K. D. (2008). Ostracism increases social susceptibility. Social Influence, 3(3), 143-153.
  5. Chung, Y. W. (2018). Workplace ostracism and workplace behaviors: A moderated mediation model of perceived stress and psychological empowerment. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 31(3), 304–317. doi:10.1080/10615806.2018.1424835 Cohen, S. (1980). Aftereffects of Stress on Human Performance and Social Behavior: A Review of Research and Theory, 88(1), 82–108.
  6. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., Mermelstein, R., Health, J., Behavior, S., & Dec, N. (2008). A Global Measure of Perceived Stress A Global Measure of Perceived Stress, 24(4), 385–396.
  7. Cremer, D. De, & Hiel, A. Van. (2006). Effects of another person’s fair treatment on one’s own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much the other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 231–249.
  8. Dupas, P., & Robinson, J. (2013). Savings constraints and microenterprise development: Evidence from a field experiment in Kenya. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1), 163-92.
  9. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?. Academy of management journal, 50(4), 869-884.
  10. Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The Development and Validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale, 93(6), 1348–1366.
  11. Fox, S., & Stallworth, L. E. (2005). Racial/ethnic bullying: Exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. Journal o