SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Business Group Affiliation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey

İş Grubu Üyeliği ve Firma Performansı: Türkiye’den Kanıtlar

ÖZCAN IŞIK
Pages
347–357
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, firms with low leverage benefit from group membership.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – The aim of this study is to examine the influence of business group affiliation on firm performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – In this study, dynamic panel data regression analysis is used to determine the association between group membership and firm performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, firms with low leverage benefit from group membership.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2013-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this study is to examine the influence of business group affiliation on firm performance. Design/methodology/approach – In this study, dynamic panel data regression analysis is used to determine the association between group membership and firm performance. The estimates are based on yearly data of 271 firms for the period 2013-2017. Findings – Empirical findings of the study indicate that group membership increases a firm's accounting (ROA)and stock market performance (Tobin’s Q) measures. Our findings also imply that firm specific factors such as firm size and financial leverage effectively moderates the group affiliation-performance relationship for ROA model. Discussion – The advantages of business groups that play important roles in every economy for member firms continue to be discussed in the literature. According to the findings of the study, business groups are generally beneficial for member firms. However, the positive impact of group membership on firm performance decreases as firms grow. In addition, firms with low leverage benefit from group membership.

Özet

Amaç – Bu çalışmanın amacı, iş grubu üyeliğinin firma performansı üzerindeki etkisini dinamik panel veri analizi ile araştırmaktır. Yöntem – 2013-2017 dönemini kapsayan çalışmada Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan 271 firma verisinden ve Dinamik panel veri analizinden faydalanılmıştır. Bulgular – Çalışmanın ampirik bulguları, grup üyeliği ile hem muhasebe temelli hem de piyasa temelli firma performans ölçüleri arasında pozitif yönlü ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca bulgularımız grup üyeliği-firma performansı ilişkisinin firma büyüklüğü ve finansal kaldıraç gibi firma düzeyindeki değişkenlerden önemli ölçüde etkilendiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Tartışma – Her ekonomide önemli roller oynayan iş gruplarının üye firmalar açısından sağladığı avantajlar literatürde tartışılmaya devam etmektedir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre genel olarak iş grupları üye firmalar için fayda sağlamaktadır. Ancak, grup üyeliğinin firma performansı üzerindeki pozitif etkisi firmalar büyüdükçe azalmaktadır. Ayrıca, kaldıraç oranı düşük olan firmalar, grup üyeliğinden özellikle fayda sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, Ö. (2019). Business Group Affiliation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 347–357. https://ajindex.com/articles/217632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Afza, T., Slahudin, C., & Nazir, M. S. (2008). “Diversification and corporate performance: An evaluation of Pakistani firms”. South Asian Journal of Management, 15(3), 7-18.
  2. Ahmad, I., Oláh, J., Popp, J., & Máté, D. (2018). “Does Business Group Affiliation Matter for Superior Performance? Evidence from Pakistan”. Sustainability, 10(9), 3060. Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  3. Bae, K.H., J.K. Kang & J.M. Kim. (2002). “Tunneling or Value Added? Evidence From Mergers By Korean Business Groups”. The Journal of Finance, 62(6), 2695-2740.
  4. Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3.Ed., John Wiley & Sons. Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models”. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
  5. Cameron, C. A. & Trivedi, P. K. (2005).Microeconometrics: Methods and Application, Cambridge University Press.
  6. Carney, M. (2008).“The Many Futures of Asian Business Groups”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 595– 613. Chakrabarti, A., K. Singh & I. Mahmood. (2007).” Diversifıcation and Performance: Evidence From East Asian Firms”. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 101–120. Chang S.J. & U. Choi. (1988), "Strategy, Structure and Performance of Korean Business Groups: A Transactions Cost Approach". The Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(2), 141-158.
  7. Chang, S.J. & J. Hong. (2000). “Economic Performance of Group-Affiliated Companies in Korea: Intragroup Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transactions”. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 429- 448. Cheong, K.S., K. Choo & K. Lee. (2010). ” Understanding The Behavior of Business Groups: A Dynamic Model and Empirical Analysis”. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 141-152.
  8. Chung, C.N. (2001). “Markets, Culture And Instıtutıons: The Emergence of Large Busıness Groups In Taıwan, 1950s-1970s”. Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), 719-745.
  9. Claessens, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2006). “The benefits and costs of group affiliation: Evidence from East Asia”. Emerging Markets Review, 7(1), 1-26.
  10. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). ”Business Groups And Their Types”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 419–437.
  11. Daud, W.M.N.W., N.B. Salamudin & I.B. Ahmad. (2009). “Corporate Diversification and Performance”. International Business Education Journal, 2(1), 1-18.
  12. Ferris, S.P., K.A