Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

The Impact of Conscious Awareness and Consumer Uniqueness on Consumer Ethnocentrism and Demographics Comparisons

Pages
375–393
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the study is thought to contribute to both the literature and the sectoral field due to the limited number of studies on the concept of consumer uniqueness in the literature and the analysis results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose - This study aimed to interpret the differences stemming from the effect of demographic variables by analysing the relationship between conscious awareness, consumer uniqueness, and consumer ethnocentrism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – A survey has been carried across Turkey on consumers over 18 to determine this relationship.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the study is thought to contribute to both the literature and the sectoral field due to the limited number of studies on the concept of consumer uniqueness in the literature and the analysis results.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose - This study aimed to interpret the differences stemming from the effect of demographic variables by analysing the relationship between conscious awareness, consumer uniqueness, and consumer ethnocentrism. Design/methodology/approach – A survey has been carried across Turkey on consumers over 18 to determine this relationship. The data obtained were interpreted through the SPSS package program. In the first part of the study, a literature review was conveyed to explain conscious awareness, consumer uniqueness, and consumer ethnocentrism concepts. In the second part, conscious awareness and the relationship between consumer uniqueness and consumer ethnocentrism are described. Thus, regression, t-test and ANOVA analysis were conducted. Findings - According to the analysis results, organizational consumer uniqueness positively affects consumer ethnocentrism. Besides, differences have been achieved between demographic variables and conscious awareness, consumer uniqueness, and consumer ethnocentrism. Discussion - The effects of consumer uniqueness, ethnocentrism and similar phenomena on consumption and purchasing habits are essential for marketing companies. In the analysis conducted in this context, it was revealed that there is a positive relationship between consumer uniqueness and consumer ethnocentrism, while no significant relationship was found between the conscious awareness perceptions of consumers and consumer ethnocentrism. In addition, the study is thought to contribute to both the literature and the sectoral field due to the limited number of studies on the concept of consumer uniqueness in the literature and the analysis results.

🔖

Cite This Article

PİR, E. Ö. (2021). The Impact of Conscious Awareness and Consumer Uniqueness on Consumer Ethnocentrism and Demographics Comparisons. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 375–393. https://ajindex.com/articles/217563

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Allen, T. D., and Kiburz, K. M. (2012). Trait mindfulness and work-family balance among working parents: The mediating effects of vitality and sleep quality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 372–379.
  2. Armağan, E.A., and Gürsoy, Ö. (2011). Satın alma kararlarında tüketici etnosentrizmi ve menşe ülke etkisinin CETSCALE ölçeği ile değerlendirilmesi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2): 67-77.
  3. Asil, H.,and Kaya, İ. (2013). Türk tüketicilerin etnosentrik eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1): 113-132.
  4. Azak, A. (2018). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bilinçli farkındalık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 15(3), 170-176.
  5. Balabanis, G. and Diamantopoulos, A. (2004). Domestic country bias, country-of-origin effects and consumer ethnocentrism: a multidimensional unfolding approach. Journal of Marine Science, 32(1): 80-95.
  6. Belk, R. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 265-280.
  7. Brock, T. (1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. A. Greenwald, T. Brock, and T. Ostrom, Psychological foundations of attitudes (s. 243275). New York: Academic Press.
  8. Brown, K. W., and Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), 822-848.
  9. Carmody, J., Reed, G., Kristeller, J., and Merriam, P. (2008). Mindfulness, spirituality, and health-related symptoms. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(4), 393– 403. Caruana A., Magri E. (1996). The Effect of Dogmatism and Social Class Variables on Consumer Ethnocentrism in Malta.Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14(4), 39-44.
  10. Cassidy, T., and Lynn, R. (1989). A multifactorial approach to achievement motivation: The development of a comprehensive measure. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 301-312.
  11. Cömert, E. (2019). Marka kişiliği ve tüketici etnosentrizmi arasındaki ilişki: hızlı tüketim sektörü üzerine bir araştırma. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Marmara Üniversitesi,
  12. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  13. Conrad C., Chakrabarty, S., and Brown G.(1997). Social desirability and consumer ethnocentric tendencies. Southwestern marketing association proceedings, March, 182-185.
  14. Crane, R. S., Brewer, J., Feldman, C., Kabat-Zinn, J., Santorelli, S., Williams, J. M. G., and Kuyken, W. (2017). What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the wef