Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT WATER STRESS LEVELS ON BIOMASS YIELD AND AGRONOMIC TRAITS OF SWITCHGRASS (Panicum virgatum L.) CULTIVARS UNDER ARID AND SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS

Pages
25–34
Publication Date
2021-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the biomass yields from single harvest of rain-fed treatments (S5) and two harvests of the other irrigation treatments (S1-S4), IWUE values and water deficits of the region, it was concluded that single harvest was more suitable for switchgrass plants grown under ecological conditions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the effects of different water stress levels on biomass yield, plant height, number of stalks per unit area, single stalk weight, yield reduction ratios and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) values of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars under Central Anatolia conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Experiments were conducted for two years (2016 – 2017) in randomized blocks – split plots experimental design with three replications under Konya ecological conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the biomass yields from single harvest of rain-fed treatments (S5) and two harvests of the other irrigation treatments (S1-S4), IWUE values and water deficits of the region, it was concluded that single harvest was more suitable for switchgrass plants grown under ecological conditions
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 – 2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Biomass yield · climate change · switchgrass

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different water stress levels on biomass yield, plant height, number of stalks per unit area, single stalk weight, yield reduction ratios and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) values of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars under Central Anatolia conditions. Experiments were conducted for two years (2016 – 2017) in randomized blocks – split plots experimental design with three replications under Konya ecological conditions. Six switchgrass cultivars (Shelter, Alamo, Cave in rock, Shawnee, Kanlow and Trailblazer) and five different irrigation treatments (water stress levels: S1: Full irrigation; S2: 75% of full irrigation; S3: 50% of full irrigation; S4: 25% of full irrigation and S5: Rain-fed without irrigation) were used in present experiments. Kanlow, Alamo and Trailblazer cultivars had greater biomass yields than the other cultivars in all water stress treatments. Under different water stress treatments, dry biomass yields varied between 48300 kg ha-1 (S5- Cave in rock) and 25120 kg ha-1 (S1- Kanlow); plant heights varied between 70 cm (S5) and 180 cm (S1); number of stalks per unit area (meter) varied between 221 (S5) and 356 (S1); stalk weights varied between 0.56 g (S5) and 2.25 g (S1). IWUE was calculated as 5.7 kg m-3 for the first harvest and as 2.1 kg m-3 for the second harvest. Considering the biomass yields from single harvest of rain-fed treatments (S5) and two harvests of the other irrigation treatments (S1-S4), IWUE values and water deficits of the region, it was concluded that single harvest was more suitable for switchgrass plants grown under ecological conditions

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜLAL, E., SOYLU, S., ŞAHİN, M. (2021). EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT WATER STRESS LEVELS ON BIOMASS YIELD AND AGRONOMIC TRAITS OF SWITCHGRASS (Panicum virgatum L.) CULTIVARS UNDER ARID AND SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 25–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/217485

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alexopoulou, E., N. Sharma, M. Christou, I. Piscioneri, M. Mardikis and V. Pigniatelli. 2002. Switchgrass in the Mediterranean region. Final Report. see www.switchgrass.nl. (Accessed 10.01.2020).
  2. Alexopoulou, E., F. Zanetti, E.G. Papazoglou, M. Christou, Y. Papatheohari, K. Tsiotas and I. Papamichael. 2017. Long-term studies on switchgrass grown on a marginal area in Greece under different varieties and nitrogen fertilization rates. Industrial Crops & Products. 107: 446–452.
  3. Aimar, D., M. Calafat, A.M. Andrade, L. Carassay, F. Bouteau, G. Abdala and M.L. Molas. 2014. Drought effects on the early development stages of Panicum virgatum L.: Cultivar differences. Biomass and Bioenergy. 66: 49-59.
  4. Araghi, S.G. and M.T. Assad. 1998. Evaluation of four screening techniques for drought resistance and their relationship to yield reduction ratio in wheat. Euphytica. 103: 293–299. Anonymous, 2009. Problems of Konya closed basin groundwater and solutions. Konya Chamber of Geological Engineers publications (News bulletin p: 78-81). (Accessed 01.10.2019).
  5. Barney, J.N., J.J. Mann, G.B. Kayser, E. Blumwald, A.V. Deynze and J.M. Ditomaso. 2009. Tolerance of switchgrass to extreme soil moisture stress: Ecological implications. Plant Science. 177: 732. Cassida, K.A., J.P. Muir, M.A. Hussey, J.C. Read, B.C. Venuto and W.R. Ocumpaugh. 2005. Biofuel component concentrations and yields of switchgrass in South Central U.S. Environments Crop Science. 45 (2): 682- 692. Cicek, F. 2017. The determination of G.D.D. for different morphological stages and physiological characteristics of cutting times of switchgrass varieties (Panicum virgatium L.). Selcuk University Natural an Applied Sciences Department Master Thesis. Pages: 24-43.
  6. Geren, H., Y.T. Kavut and G.D. Topcu. 2016. A preliminary study on the biomass yield and some agronomical characteristıcs of different switch grass genotypes grown under Bornova ecological conditions. 2. National Biofuels Symposium. Samsun/Turkey. Pages: 286-292.
  7. Giannoulis, K.D., T. Karyotis, M.M. Sakellariou, L. Bastiaans, P.C. Struik and N.G. Danalatos. 2016. Switchgrass biomass partitioning and growth characteristics under different management practices. NJAS- WageningenJ.LifeSci. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.011
  8. Howell, T.A., R.H. Cuencaand and K.H. Solomon. 1990.
  9. Crop yield response. "Manegement of farm ırrigation Systems. Edit. G.J. Hoffman., T.A. Howell., K.H. Solomon." Chap. 5. An ASAE Monograph. Pages: 93- 116. Kara, M. 2011. I