Journals / Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Helicobacter pylori infeksiyonlu genç hastalarda tedavi seçenekleri; Standard üçlü veya bismuth bazlı dörtlü tedavi

Treatment choices in young patients with Helicobacter pylori infection: Standard triple or bismuth-based quadruple therapies

Pages
57–62
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no difference between the second-line treatment response rates of levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and lansoprazole and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid protocols.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aims: Helicobacter pylori is the most abundant pathogen in all age groups worldwide, and eradication rates of this pathogen are decreasing over time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to determine the efficacy rates of standard triple and bismuth-based quadruple therapies in young patients with dyspepsia, and in the event of eradication failure, to assess the success rates of rescue treatments with bismuthbased quadruple or levofloxacin-based triple protocols.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no difference between the second-line treatment response rates of levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and lansoprazole and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid protocols.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aims: Helicobacter pylori is the most abundant pathogen in all age groups worldwide, and eradication rates of this pathogen are decreasing over time. We aimed to determine the efficacy rates of standard triple and bismuth-based quadruple therapies in young patients with dyspepsia, and in the event of eradication failure, to assess the success rates of rescue treatments with bismuthbased quadruple or levofloxacin-based triple protocols. Materials and Methods: A total of 116 Helicobacter pylori -positive young patients (≤35 years old) with dyspepsia were given either lansoprazole 30 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 14 days or colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid for 14 days. In case of eradication failure, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and lansoprazole or colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid therapies were given as rescue treatments. Results: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates were 85.7% in the colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid group and 63.3% in the lansoprazole 30 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid group. Smoking, alcohol, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use had no effect on response; the only factor affecting the res-ponse rate was colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid treatment. The nonresponder patients in the lansoprazole 30 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid group and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid groups were given colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid and levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and lansoprazole rescue treatments, respec- tively, and a 70% success rate was achieved in both groups. Conclu- sions: Even in young patients, who are supposed to be susceptible to clarithromycin-based treatment, the Helicobacter pylori eradication rates were lower with lansoprazole 30 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid treatment; thus, colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid protocol should be preferred as first-line treatment. There was no difference between the second-line treatment response rates of levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and lansoprazole and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, lansoprazole 30 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg tid protocols.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Helicobacter pylori dünyada tüm yaş gruplarında en sık görülen gastrik patojen olup bu patojenin eradikasyon oranları gün geçtikçe azalmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı dispepsisi olan Helicobacter pylori pozitif genç hastalarda standard üçlü ve bizmut bazlı dörtlü tadavilerin başarı oranlarını belirlemek ve tedaviye cevapsızlık durumunda levofloksasin bazlı üçlü ve yine bizmut bazlı dörtlü ikinci basamak tedavilerinin başarı oranlarını saptamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Otuz beş yaş altı 116 Helicobacter pylori pozitif dispepsili hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı bir gruba lansoprazol 30 mg bid, amoksisilin 1 gr bid, klaritromisin 500 mg bid 14 günlük tedavi diğer gruba kolloidal bizmut subsitrat 300 mg qid, lansoprazol 30 mg bid, metronidazol 500 mg tid, tetrasiklin 500 mg tid 14 günlük tedavi olarak verildi. Tedaviye yanıtsız olgulara, levofloksasin, amoksisilin, lansoprazol veya kolloidal bizmut subsitrat 300 mg qid, lansoprazol 30 mg bid, metronidazol 500 mg tid, tetrasiklin 500 mg tid tedavileri ikinci basamak tedavi olarak verildi. Bulgular: Helicobacter pylori eradikasyon oranları kolloidal bizmut subsitrat 300 mg qid, lansoprazol 30 mg bid, metronidazol 500 mg tid, tetrasiklin 500 mg tid grubunda %85.7 ve lansoprazol 30 mg bid, amoksisilin 1 gr bid, klaritromisin 500 mg bid grubunda %63.3 bulundu. İstatistiksel olarak sigara, alkol ve nonsteroid-antiinflamatuvar kullanımının tedavi cevabı üzerinde hiçbir etkisi bulunmaz iken tedaviyi etkileyen tek faktörün kolloidal bizmut subsitrat 300 mg qid, lansoprazol 30 mg bid, metronidazol 500 mg tid, tetrasiklin 500 mg tid tedavi seçeneği olduğu belirlendi. Tedaviye yanıtsızlarda ikinci basamak tedavi olarak lansoprazol 30 mg bid, amoksisilin 1 gr bid, klaritromisin 500 mg bid grubunda olanlara kolloidal bizmut subsitrat 300 mg qid, lansoprazol 30 mg bid, metronidazol 500 mg tid, tetrasiklin 500 mg tid ve kolloidal bizmut subsitrat 300 mg qid, lansoprazol 30 mg bid, metronidazol 500 mg tid, tetrasiklin 500 mg tid grubunda olanlara levofloksasin, amoksisilin, lansoprazol tedavisi verildi, her iki grupta da ikinci basamak tedavi ile %70 oranında başarı elde edildi. Sonuç: Klaritromisine duyarlı olmasını beklediğimiz genç hastalarda dahi Helicobacter pylori eradikasyon oranları lansoprazol 30 mg bid, amoksisilin 1 gr bid, klaritromisin 500 mg bid grubunda düşük olup bu hastalarda da kolloidal bizmut subsitrat 300 mg qid, lansoprazol 30 mg bid, metronidazol 500 mg tid, tetrasiklin 500 mg tid tedavisi ilk basamak tedavi olarak düşünülmelidir. İlk basamak tedaviye yanıtsız gençlerde ikinci basamak tedavi seçeneklerinden kolloidal bizmut subsitrat 300 mg qid, lansoprazol 30 mg bid, metronidazol 500 mg tid, tetrasiklin 500 mg tid ve levofloksasin, amoksisilin, lansoprazol arasında fark olmadığı saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAVAŞ, N. (2014). Helicobacter pylori infeksiyonlu genç hastalarda tedavi seçenekleri; Standard üçlü veya bismuth bazlı dörtlü tedavi. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 57–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/217450

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Ozaydin ANG, Cali S, Türkyilmaz AS. Turkey Helicobacter pylori prevalence survey 2003. [In Turkish]. İstanbul: Marmara Saglik ve Egitim Arastirma Vakfi, 2007; 42. 2.Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, et al. European Helico- bacter Study Group. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection - the Maastricht IV/Florence Consensus Report. Gut 2012; 61: 646- 64. 3.Howden CW, Hunt RH. Guidelines for the management of Heli- cobacter pylori infection. Ad Hoc Committee on practice para- meters of American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroen- terol 1998; 93: 2330-8. 4.Nadir I, Yonem O, Ozin Y, et al. Comparison of two different treat- ment protocols in Helicobacter pylori eradication. South Med J 2011; 104: 102-5. 5.Ermis F, Akyüz F, Uyanikoglu A, et al. Second-line levofloxacin- based triple therapy’s efficiency for Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer. South Med J 2011; 104: 579-83. 6.Polat Z, Kadayifci A, Kantarcioglu M, et al. Comparison of levo- floxacin-containing sequential and standard triple therapies for the eradiation of Helicobacter pylori. Eur J Intern Med 2012; 23: 165-8. 7.8.Uygun A, Kadayifci A, Polat Z, et al. Comparison of bismuth–con- taining quadruple and concomitant therapies as a first–line treat- ment option for Helicobacter pylori. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012; 23: 8-13.
  2. Ergül B, Dogan Z, Sarikaya M, et al. The efficacy of two-week quadruple first-line therapy with bismuth, lansoprazole, amoxicil- lin, clarithromycin on Helicobacter pylori eradication: a prospective study. Helicobacter 2013; 18: 454-8. 9. Gisbert JP, Pajares JM. 13 C-urea breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 1001-17. 10. Malfertheiner P, Mégraud F, O’Morain C, et al. Current European concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection the Maastricht Consensus Report. The European Helicobacter Pylori Study Group (EHPSG). Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997; 9: 1-2. 11. Lam SK, Talley NJ. Report of the 1997 Asia Pacific Consensus Con- ference on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gas- troenterol Hepatol 1998; 13: 1-12. 12. Kadayifci A, Buyukhatipoglu H, Savas CM, et al. Eradication of He- licobacter pylori with triple therapy: an epidemiologic analysis of trends in Turkey over 10 years. Clin Ther 2006; 28: 1960-6. 13. Philips RH, Whitehead MW, Lacey S, et al. Solubility, absorption, and anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of bismuth subnitrate and col- loidal bismuth