Journals / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-II and Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-Straightforward Items: psychometric properties of the Turkish versions

Pages
410–420
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The implications of the research were discussed in light of the related literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The present study aimed at examining the psychometric properties of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-II (BFNE-II) and the BFNE–Straightforward Items (BFNE-S) in a non-clinical Turkish sample.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The sample consisted of a total of 243 undergraduate students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The implications of the research were discussed in light of the related literature.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The present study aimed at examining the psychometric properties of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-II (BFNE-II) and the BFNE–Straightforward Items (BFNE-S) in a non-clinical Turkish sample. Method: The sample consisted of a total of 243 undergraduate students. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was done for the BFNE-II and the BFNE-S to confirm the proposed unitary model; internal consistency coefficient was calculated, and reliability coefficients were determined by using the split-half method. For concurrent validity, the Fear of Positive Evaluation Scale, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale were used. Results: As a result of CFA, the BFNE-II and the BFNE-S showed a good fit to the unitary model as in the original form. The Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient of the BFNE-II was found to be 0.92 and the reliability coefficient determined by the split-half method was 0.94; the reliability coefficients of the BFNE-S were 0.90 for the Cronbach’s Alpha and 0.91 for the splithalf method. The analysis also revealed that BFNE-II and BFNE-S have good concurrent validity with the measures of the fear of positive evaluation, self-esteem and social anxiety. Conclusion: These findings support the use of the brief fear of negative evaluation revisions (BFNE-II and BFNE-S) in Turkish culture as measures of fear of negative evaluation in research. The implications of the research were discussed in light of the related literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, B. G., ALKAR, Ö. Y. (2020). Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-II and Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-Straightforward Items: psychometric properties of the Turkish versions. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 410–420. https://ajindex.com/articles/217250

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth Ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association, 2013
  2. Clark DM, Wells A. A cognitive model of social phobia. In Liebowitz M, Heimberg RG (editors). Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. New York: Guilford Press, 1995, 69-93
  3. Rapee RM, Heimberg RG. A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behav Res Ther 1997; 35:741-756
  4. Beck AT, Emery G, Greenberg RL. Anxiety disorders and phobias: A Cognitive Approach. New York: Basic Books, 1985, 146-164
  5. Coles ME, Turk CL, Heimberg RG, Fresco DM. Effects of varying levels of anxiety within social situations: relationship to memory perspective and attributions in social phobia. Behav Res Ther 2001; 39:651-665
  6. Hackmann A, Surawy C, Clark DM. Seeing yourself through others’ eyes: A study of spontaneously occurring images in social phobia. Behav Cogn Psychother 1998; 26:3-12
  7. Wells A, Papageorgiou C. Social phobia: Effects of external attention on anxiety, negative beliefs, and perspective taking. Behav Ther 1998; 29:357-370
  8. Weeks JW, Heimberg RG, Fresco DM, Hart TA, Turk CL, Schneier FR, et al. Empirical validation and psychometric evaluation of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale in patients with social anxiety disorder. Psychol Assess 2005; 17:179-190
  9. Watson D, Friend R. Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. J Consult Clin Psychol 1969; 33:448-457
  10. Stopa L, Clark DM. Social phobia: Comments on the viability and validity of an analogue research strategy and British norms for the fear of negative evaluation questionnaire. Behav Cogn Psychother 2001; 29:423-430
  11. Erkan Z, Cam S, Gucray S. Adaptation, validity and reliability study of Social Avoidance and Anxiety and Fear of Negative Evaluation Scales. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal 2003; 2:112-117
  12. Leary MR. A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1983; 9:371-375
  13. Koydemir S, Demir A. Psychometric properties of the brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale in a Turkish sample. Psychol Rep 2007; 100:883-893
  14. Bilge F, Kelecioglu H. Psychometric properties of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale: Turkish Form. Eurasian J Educ Res 2008; 32:21-38
  15. Cetin B, Dogan T, Sapmaz F. Turkish adaptation of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale Form: a validity and reliability study. Education and Science 2010; 35:205