SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

TRAINING SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND DECISION MAKING FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA: A THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

Taha Talip TÜRKİSTANLI
Barış KULEYİN
Pages
10–16
Publication Date
2019-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Especially the usage of the training scenarios including unexpected situations to increase familiarity and readiness levels are referred frequently.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Maritime accidents are one of the main factors that disrupt maritime transportation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among these accidents, collision situations, due to their frequency and consequences, possess a great threat to the safety of navigation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Especially the usage of the training scenarios including unexpected situations to increase familiarity and readiness levels are referred frequently.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Situational Awareness · Decision Making · Collision at sea

Abstract

Maritime accidents are one of the main factors that disrupt maritime transportation. Among these accidents, collision situations, due to their frequency and consequences, possess a great threat to the safety of navigation. The majority of these accidents are directly related to the operations within the ship and human errors. In this study, we explore the importance and the training needs for situational awareness and decision making for preventing collisions at sea through a literature review. Studies suggest that seafarers on board who are responsible for keeping navigational watch can both be the causer and preventer for collisions. Recommendations of the studies in the field point to the need for specialized training to improve situational awareness and decision making. Training seafarers’ expectations and goals for collision situations are proposed to achieve this improvement. Especially the usage of the training scenarios including unexpected situations to increase familiarity and readiness levels are referred frequently.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKİSTANLI, T. T., KULEYİN, B. (2019). TRAINING SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND DECISION MAKING FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA: A THEORETICAL BACKGROUND. Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 10–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/217022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Antao, P., & Soares, C. G. (2006). Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 3(2), 107-116.
  2. Baker, C. C., & McCafferty, D. B. (2005). Accident database review of human element concerns: What do the results mean for classification?. In Proc. Int Conf.‘Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation, RINA Feb. Barnett, M., Gatfield, D., & Pekcan, C. (2006). Non-technical skills: the vital ingredient in world maritime technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on world maritime technology. Batalden, B. M., & Sydnes, A. K. (2014). Maritime safety and the ISM code: a study of investigated casualties and incidents. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 13(1), 3-25.
  3. Bohanec, M., Pirtošek, Z., Georgiev, D., Gregorič-Kramberger, M., Markič, O., Kordeš, U., Polič, M., Ule, A., & Tancig, S. (2009). INTERDISCIPLINARY DESCRIPTION OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS. INDECS, 7(2), 22-116. Brčko, T., Perković, M., & Cankar, Ž. (2014). Decision Making in the Process of Collision Avoidance at Sea–the Cognitive Aspect. Book of, 396 Bryant, D. J., Webb, R. D., & McCann, C. (2003). Synthesizing two approaches to decision making in command and control. Celik, M., & Cebi, S. (2009). Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(1), 66-75.
  4. Chauvin, C. (2011). Human factors and maritime safety. The Journal of Navigation, 64(4), 625-632.
  5. Chauvin, C., & Lardjane, S. (2008). Decision making and strategies in an interaction situation: Collision avoidance at sea. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(4), 259-269.
  6. Chauvin, C., Clostermann, J. P., & Hoc, J. M. (2008). Situation awareness and the decision-making process in a dynamic situation: avoiding collisions at sea. Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making, 2(1), 1-23.
  7. Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J. P., & Langard, B. (2013). Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, 26-37.
  8. Cordon, J. R., Mestre, J. M., & Walliser, J. (2017). Human factors in seafaring: The role of situation awareness. Safety Science, 93, 256-265.
  9. Darbra, R. M., & Casal, J. (2004). Historical analysis of accidents in seaports. Safety science, 42(2), 85-98
  10. Demirel, E., & Bayer, D. (2015a). Improvement of Safety Education and Training For Seafaring Officers-Gemi Zabitlerinin Güvenlik Eğitim ve Ö