Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Geç dönem myelomeningosel onarımında ventrikülo-peritoneal şant yerleştirilmesinin zamanlaması

The timing of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt application at the late stage myelomeningocele repair

Pages
6–9
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no statistically difference between the risk of infection and the timing of shunt application at late stage myelomeningocele repair.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The insertion time of the shunt used for hydrocephalus treatment is controversial for the risk of infection in patients with myelomeningocele.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many authors have reported the risk of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infection in early myelomeningocele repaired patients (the first 3 days after birth).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no statistically difference between the risk of infection and the timing of shunt application at late stage myelomeningocele repair.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The insertion time of the shunt used for hydrocephalus treatment is controversial for the risk of infection in patients with myelomeningocele. Many authors have reported the risk of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infection in early myelomeningocele repaired patients (the first 3 days after birth). The aim of this study is to evaluate the VP shunt insertion time with risk of shunt infection in cases who repaired myelomeningocele sac in late stage. Materials and Methods: In this study, 50 patients who had undergone myelomeningocele repair after the 4th day of life in our institution during the period between 2000 and 2009, were analyzed. 31 of 50 cases underwent a simultaneous shunt procedure (Group A) and the remaining 19 cases underwent a shunt operation following myelomeningocele sac repair at a different session (Group B). Results: For all cases, the shunt infection rate was 12% while infection ratio was 9.6% in Group A, and 15.7% in Group B. Shunt infection was 6,9% in cases with myelomeningocele repaired after 10 days, while this was 23.5% in cases with repair between the 4th and 10th days. Conclusion: The risk of VP shunt infection for late period sac repair is higher between the four to ten days than after the ten days. There was no statistically difference between the risk of infection and the timing of shunt application at late stage myelomeningocele repair.

Özet

Amaç: Myelomeningoselli hastalarda hidrosefali tedavisi için şant takılmasının zamanı hala enfeksiyon riski açısından tartışmalıdır. Birçok yazar ventrikülo-peritoneal şant enfeksiyon riskini erken myelomeningosel onarımı (doğumdan sonra ilk 3 günde) yapılan hastalarda bildirmişlerdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; geç dönemde myelomeningosel kese onarımı yapılan olgularda VP şant takılmasının zamanı ile şant enfeksiyon riskini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 2000 ile 2009 yılları arasında kurumumuzda myelomeningosel onarımı hayatın 4. gününden sonra yapılan 50 hasta değerlendirildi. Bu 50 olgunun 31 inde eş zamanlı VP şant işlemi yapılırken (Group A), geriye kalan 19 olguya myelomeningosel kese onarımı sonrasında farklı seansta VP şant ameliyatı yapıldı (Group B). Bulgular: Tüm olgular için şant enfeksiyon oranı %12 iken, bu oran Grup A daki hastalarda % 9.6 ve Grup B deki hastalarda % 15.7 idi. 10 günden sonra myelomeningosel tamiri yapılanlardan şant enfeksiyonu % 6.9, myelomeningosel onarımı 4. ve 10. günler arasında gerçekleştirilen hastalarda ise %23.5 idi. Sonuç: Geç dönem kese onarımı için VP şant enfeksiyon riski 4. ile 10. günler arasında, 10. günden sonrasından daha yüksektir. Geç dönem myelomeningosel onarımında enfeksiyon riski ve şant yerleştiriliminin zamanlaması açısından istatistiksel olarak fark yoktu.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÜN, B., ÜÇLER, N., EROL, F. S., KAPLAN, M., GEDİZ, T., YILMAZ, İ. (2012). Geç dönem myelomeningosel onarımında ventrikülo-peritoneal şant yerleştirilmesinin zamanlaması. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 6–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/216846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Cohen AR, Robinson S. Early manegement of myelomeningocele. In: McLone DG (Editor). Pediatric Neurosurgery. ed 4, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2001: 241-259
  2. Epstein NE, Rosenthal AD, Zito J, Osipoff M. Placement and myelomeningocele repair: simultaneous vs sequential shunting. Review of 12 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 1985; 1: 145-147
  3. Heimburger RF. Early repair of myelomeningocele (spina bifida cystica). J Neurosurg 1972; 37: 594-600
  4. Charney E, Weller S, Sutton L, Bruce DA, Schut LB. Management of the newborn with myelomeningocele: Time for a decision – making process. Pediatrics 1985; 75: 58-64
  5. Gaskill SJ. Primary closure of open myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 16: 2-15
  6. McLone D. Care of the neonate with a myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Clin North AM 1998; 9: 111-120
  7. Brau RH, Rodríguez R, Ramírez MV, Gonzalez R, Martinez V. Experience in the management of myelomeningocele in Puerto Rico. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 726-731
  8. Akalan N. Spinal acık ve kapalı orta hat birlesim anomalileri. In: Aksoy K (Editor). Temel Norosirurji
  9. Baskı, Ankara: Turk Norosirurji Dernegi Yayınları, 2005: 1364-1373
  10. Chadduck WM, Reding DL. Experience with simultaneous ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement and myelomeningocele repair. J Pediatr Surg 1988; 23: 913-916
  11. Hubballah MY, Hoffman HJ. Early repair of myelomeningocele and simultaneous insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt: technique and results. Neurosurgery 1987; 20: 21-23
  12. Machado HR, Oliveira RS. Simultaneous repair of myelomeningocele and shunt insertion. Childs Nerv Syst 2004; 20: 107-109
  13. Miller PD, Pollack IF, Pang D. Comparison of simultaneous versus delayed ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in children undergoing myelomeningocele repair. J Child Neurol 1996; 11: 370-372
  14. Parent AD, McMillan T. Contemporaneous shunting with repair of myelpmeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 1995; 22: 132-135
  15. Mirzai H, Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Kayahan A. Outcme of patients with meningomyelocele. The Ege University experience. Childs Nerv Syst 1998; 14: 120-123
  16. Oktem IS, Menku A, Ozdemir A. When Should Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Be Performed in Cases with Myelomeningocele and Hydrocephalus? Turkish Neurosurgery 2008; 28: 387-391
  17. Tobias S, Peter R, Karen S. Neonatal immune responses to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2007; 20: 370-375
  18. Ammirati M, Raimondi AJ. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections in children. A study on the relationship be