SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2008 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

An example for the effect of 5E model on the academic success and attitude levels of students': "inclined projectile motion"

İsmet ERGİN
Uygar KANLI
Yasin ÜNSAL
Pages
47–59
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

ERGİN, İ., KANLI, U., ÜNSAL, Y. (2008). An example for the effect of 5E model on the academic success and attitude levels of students': "inclined projectile motion". Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 47–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/216389

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bağcı-Kılıç, G. (2001). Oluşturmacı fen öğretimi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 1(1), 7- 22. Brass, K., & Duke, M. (1994). Primary science in an integrated curriculum. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone ve R. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 100-111). London: The Falmer Press.
  2. Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4-16.
  3. Bruer, J. T. (1999). In search of… brain based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 648-657.
  4. Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1994). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain (2nd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Caine, R. N., ve Caine, G. (2002). Beyin temelli öğrenme [Making connections: Teaching and the human brain] (G. Ülgen, Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi 1994).
  5. Carolyn, R. P. (1997). Brain-based learning and students. The Education Digest Ann Arbor, 63(3), 10-15.
  6. Christon, M. (2002). Brain-based research and language teaching. English Teaching Forum, 40(2), 14-19.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Demirel, Ö., Erdem, E., Koç, F., Köksal, N., ve Şendoğdu, M. C. (2002). Beyin temelli öğrenmenin yabancı dil öğretiminde yeri. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15, 123-136.
  8. Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn ve Bacon. Elgar, A. G. (2004). Science textbooks for lower secondary schools in brunei: Issues of gender equity. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 875-894.
  9. Erdem, D., ve Demirel, Ö. (2002). Constructivism in curriculum development. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 81-87.
  10. Fara, E. G. (1999). Brain and learning research: Implications for meeting the needs of diverse learners. Academic Research Library, 4(119), 682-687.
  11. Grandy, R. E. (1998). Constructivisms and objectivity: Disentangling metaphysics from pedagogy. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 113-123).
  12. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  13. Gülpınar, M. A. (2005). Beyin/zihin temelli öğrenme ilkeleri ve eğitimde yapılandırmacı modeller. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 5(2), 271-306.
  14. Hansen, L., & Monk, M. (2002). Brain development, structuring of learning and science education: Where are we now? A review of some rec