Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Classification of Cancer Types by Cluster Analysis Methods

Pages
125–142
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it is seen that the 0-14 age group characteristic fails to separate the clusters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Abstract Cluster analysis can be defined as the group of methods that aim to classify multivariate observations by using similarity/dissimilarity measures between observations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, clustering analysis was applied to four different datasets created from the data registered between 1982 and 2016 for 57 cancer types in men and women according to age groups at the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and the analysis results were evaluated and interpreted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it is seen that the 0-14 age group characteristic fails to separate the clusters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler cluster analysis · Cancer Types · Cluster Validity İndex

Özet

Öz Abstract Cluster analysis can be defined as the group of methods that aim to classify multivariate observations by using similarity/dissimilarity measures between observations. The clusters obtained as a result of the analysis are required to be homogeneous within themselves and heterogeneous among themselves. This study aims to cluster cancer types in datasets created by considering age group characteristics according to gender. In the study, clustering analysis was applied to four different datasets created from the data registered between 1982 and 2016 for 57 cancer types in men and women according to age groups at the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and the analysis results were evaluated and interpreted. In addition, in determining the clustering method and the number of clusters, Cophenetic correlation coefficients and 26 cluster validity indices were used, respectively. The distribution of cancer types in age groups determined by gender was observed in 4 different datasets created with 3 different age group characteristics that led to the best separation of cancer groups, and the clustering tendencies of cancers in the relevant age groups were investigated. R-3.5.1 package program was used for analyses. In this study, the analysis results of the k-means method and the average linkage method, which was decided to be the most successful method due to the high cophenetic correlation coefficient value, were evaluated and interpreted. The number of clusters was determined as 3 with the help of cluster validity indices. When the results obtained are examined, it is seen that breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men is the most common type of cancer in the age group of 40 and above, and that these cancers are alone in a cluster. In addition, it is seen that the 0-14 age group characteristic fails to separate the clusters.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNCEKIRIK, A., GÜNERİ, Ö. İ., DURMUŞ, B. (2021). Classification of Cancer Types by Cluster Analysis Methods. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 125–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/216238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aggarwal, C. C., & Reddy, C. K. (2014). Data Clustering: Algorithms and Applications. Chapman&Hall/CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series, London. Alhamed, A., Lakshmivarahan, S., & Stensrud, D. J. (2002). Cluster analysis of multimodel ensemble data from SAMEX. Monthly weather review, 130(2), 226-256.
  2. Altın, E. (2021). Türkiye’ de İller Bazında Ulaşım Faaliyetlerinin Gelişim Durumunun Kümeleme Analizi ile Belirlenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Manisa. Australian Institute of Health and Walfare, 2021. Cancer Data in Avustralia. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/data?page=1, (Accessed Date:: 12.03.2021).
  3. Bulut, H. (2018). R Uygulamaları ile Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler, Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Tic. Ltd. Şti. Bulut, H. (2019). Türkiye'deki İllerin Yaşam Endekslerine Göre Kümelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1), 74-82.
  4. Carvalho, P. R., Munita, C. S., & Lapolli, A. L. (2019). Validity Studies Among Hierarchical Methods of Cluster Analysis Using Cophenetic Correlation Coefficient. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, 7(2A). Cormack, R. M. (1971). A Review of Classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 134(3), 321-353.
  5. Dahl, T., & Næs, T. (2004). Outlier and Group Detection in Sensory Panels Using Hierarchical Cluster Analysis with the Procrustes Distance. Food Quality and Preference, 15(3), 195-208.
  6. Demircioğlu, M., & Eşiyok, S. (2020). Covıd–19 Salgını ile Mücadelede Kümeleme Analizi ile Ülkelerin Sınıflandırılması. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(37), 369-389.
  7. Drachenberg, D., Awe, J. A., Rangel Pozzo, A., Saranchuk, J., & Mai, S. (2019). Advancing Risk Assessment of İntermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients. Cancers, 11(6), 855. Greenawalt, D. M., Duong, C., Smyth, G. K., Ciavarella, M. L., Thompson, N. J., Tiang, T.,. & Phillips, W. A. (2007). Gene Expression Profiling of Esophageal Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Barrett's Esophagus, Adenocarcinoma, and Squamous Cell Carcinoma. International Journal Of Cancer, 120(9), 1914-1921.
  8. Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, P. R. (2000). Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics. American Psychological Association. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999).
  9. Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall International Editions,