SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Determining Solar Power Plant Location Using Hesitant Fuzzy AHP Method

Gökçe CANDAN
Merve CENGİZ TOKLU
Pages
25–34
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on linguistic expressions of three different decision makers, the three alternative locations were evaluated by considering four different evaluation criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The fossil resource consumption, which is scarce for the solution of the increasing energy demand problem as the population increases, is replaced by the consumption of renewable energy resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Solar energy from renewable energy sources is the type of energy with the highest potential on earth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on linguistic expressions of three different decision makers, the three alternative locations were evaluated by considering four different evaluation criteria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Solar Power · Multi Criteria Decision Making · Hesitant Fuzzy AHP

Özet

Öz The fossil resource consumption, which is scarce for the solution of the increasing energy demand problem as the population increases, is replaced by the consumption of renewable energy resources. Solar energy from renewable energy sources is the type of energy with the highest potential on earth. The maximization of the efficiency to be taken from solar energy is possible with the correct selection of the location. The decision to decide on more than one criterion for multiple alternatives is a very difficult problem. Therefore, the problem of choosing a solar power plant is a complex decision problem, and this study aims to solve the problem of the most appropriate location for the Solar Power Plant by using Hesitant Fuzzy AHP. Based on linguistic expressions of three different decision makers, the three alternative locations were evaluated by considering four different evaluation criteria.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANDAN, G., TOKLU, M. C. (2021). Determining Solar Power Plant Location Using Hesitant Fuzzy AHP Method. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 25–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/216231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adem, A., Çakit, E., & Dağdeviren, M. (2020). Occupational health and safety risk assessment in the domain of Industry 4.0. SN Applied Sciences, 2(5), 1-6.
  2. Akkas, O. P., Erten, M. Y., Cam, E., & Inanc, N. (2017). Optimal site selection for a solar power plant in the Central Anatolian Region of Turkey. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2017.
  3. Aktas, A., & Kabak, M. (2019). A hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach for evaluating solar power plant location sites. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44(8), 7235-7247.
  4. Al Garni, H. Z., & Awasthi, A. (2017). Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Applied energy, 206, 1225-1240. Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Chaparro-González, F., Pastor-Ferrando, J. P., & Pla-Rubio, A. (2014). An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy, 66, 222-238.
  5. Ayhan, M. B. (2018). Yaz Spor Okulu Seçiminde Entegre Bir Tereddütlü-Bulanık AHP ve TOPSIS Yaklaşımı. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 22(2), 269-284.
  6. Boltürk, E., Çevik Onar, S., Öztayşi, B., Kahraman, C., & Goztepe, K. (2016). Multi-attribute warehouse location selection in humanitarian logistics using hesitant fuzzy AHP. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 8(2), 271-298.
  7. Büyüközkan, G., & Mukul, E. Evaluation of smart health technologies with hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM methods. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39(5), 6363-6375.
  8. Candan, G. (2020). Efficiency and performance analysis of economics research using hesitant fuzzy AHP and OCRA methods. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2645-2659.
  9. Choudhary, D., & Shankar, R. (2012). An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India. Energy, 42(1), 510-521.
  10. Çolak, M., & Kaya, İ. (2020). Multi-criteria evaluation of energy storage technologies based on hesitant fuzzy information: a case study for Turkey. Journal of Energy Storage, 28, 101211. Filev, D., & Yager, R. R. (1998). On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights. Fuzzy sets and systems, 94(2), 157-169.
  11. Jun, D., Tian-Tian, F., Yi-Sheng, Y., & Yu, M. (2014). Macro-site selection of wind/solar hybrid power station based on ELECTRE-II. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35, 194-204.
  12. Kahraman, C., Onar, S. Ç., & Öztayşi, B. (2018). B2C marketplace prioritization using hesi