SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2015 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Choosing the most efficacious scoring method for carpal tunnel syndrome

HÜLYA YÜCEL
MEHMET HAKAN SEYİTHANOĞLU
Pages
23–29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The easier QuickDASH questionnaire appears to be more practical for carpal tunnel release patients

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the most efficacious hand-specific questionnaire to determine functionality in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.Methods: The study included 89 patients who underwent open carpal tunnel release surgery within three years prior to the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A correlation analysis between the variables was tested using Spearman's rho test or Pearson's test for variables.Results: The QuickDASH was well correlated with pain, paresthesia and the BCTQ (p<0.001).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The easier QuickDASH questionnaire appears to be more practical for carpal tunnel release patients
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the most efficacious hand-specific questionnaire to determine functionality in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.Methods: The study included 89 patients who underwent open carpal tunnel release surgery within three years prior to the study. A visual analog scale was used to assess the intensity of pain and paresthesia symptoms. Each participant completed the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ), the quick form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the Duruoz Hand Index (DHI). The BCTQ, pain and paresthesia results were assumed as gold standards. Correlations between the MHQ, QuickDASH, and the DHI were analyzed. A correlation analysis between the variables was tested using Spearman's rho test or Pearson's test for variables.Results: The QuickDASH was well correlated with pain, paresthesia and the BCTQ (p<0.001). The questionnaires complied with each other.Conclusion: In addition to its complicated scoring, the MHQ contained detailed subparameters with similar questions and takes a long time to complete. Further studies may confirm the effective usage of the DHI. The easier QuickDASH questionnaire appears to be more practical for carpal tunnel release patients

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEL, H., SEYİTHANOĞLU, M. H. (2015). Choosing the most efficacious scoring method for carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 23–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/216215

References (13)

  1. Akelman E, Weiss AP. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Etiology and endoscopic treatment. Orthop Clin North Am 1995;26:769-78.
  2. Akman S, Ertürer E, Celik M, Aksoy B, Gür B, Oztürk I. The results of open surgical release in carpal tunnel syndrome and evaluation of follow-up criteria. [Article in Turkish] Acta Or- thop Traumatol Turc 2002;36:259-64.
  3. Kanaan N, Sawaya RA. Carpal tunnel syndrome: modern diag- nostic and management techniques. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:311- 4. McMillan CR, Binhammer PA. Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Ques- tionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand (N Y) 2009;4:311-8.
  4. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliabil- ity and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Ques- tionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998;23:575-87.
  5. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2005;30:81-6. Szabo RM. Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful? J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:993-1002.
  6. Ollivere BJ, Logan K, Ellahee N, Miller-Jones JC, Wood M, Nairn DS. Severity scoring in carpal tunnel syndrome helps predict the value of conservative therapy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009;34:511-5.
  7. Rege AJ, Sher JL. Can the outcome of carpal tunnel release be predicted? J Hand Surg Br 2001;26:148-50.
  8. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the as- sessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1585-92.
  9. Öksüz C, Akel BS, Leblebicioğlu G, Kayıhan H. Which hand outcome measurement is best for Turkish speaking patients? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012;46:83-8.
  10. Chatterjee JS, Price PE. Comparative responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Carpal Tun- nel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2009;34:273-80.
  11. Appleby MA, Neville-Smith M, Parrott MW. Functional out- comes post carpal tunnel release: a modified replication of a pre- vious study. J Hand Ther 2009;22:240-9.
  12. Öksüz Ç, Akel BS, Oskay D, Leblebicioğlu G, Hayran KM. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability process of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in a Turkish pop- ulation. J Hand Surg Am 2011;36:486-92.
  13. Duger T, Y