Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4

Implant supported auricular prostheses: Case report

İmplant destekli kulak protezi: Olgu sunumu

Pages
314–317
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case the use of implants allows for proper replacement and remove by the patient and accepting of an ear prosthesis by the patient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The surgical ablative treatment of maxillofacial cancer, congenital deformities and trauma may cause facial disfigurement and consequently psychologic disturbances.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 13 years old female patient received two extraoral implants after surgical resection that lost right ear due to a gas cooker burn.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case the use of implants allows for proper replacement and remove by the patient and accepting of an ear prosthesis by the patient.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The surgical ablative treatment of maxillofacial cancer, congenital deformities and trauma may cause facial disfigurement and consequently psychologic disturbances. Patients may be restored using modern micro vascular flaps, but some patients may not receive such surgery because of too many reasons. The application of the principles of osseointegration to the craniofacial skeleton can offer the patient with defects from trauma or ablative cancer surgery a functional and aesthetic restoration, with minimal morbidity. A 13 years old female patient received two extraoral implants after surgical resection that lost right ear due to a gas cooker burn. After clinical control, there was no any complications and infection in implant area. In this case the use of implants allows for proper replacement and remove by the patient and accepting of an ear prosthesis by the patient.

Özet

Maksillofasiyal kanser, konjenital deformiteler veya travmaların cerrahi ablasyon tedavilerine bağlı olarak, yüzde şekil bozuklukları ve dolayısı ile hastalarda psikolojik sorunlar meydana gelebilmektedir. Vakaların bir kısmı modern mikrovasküler flap metotları kullanılarak tedavi edilebilirler, fakat bazı hastalar cerrahi uygulamalar için bir çok sebebe bağlı olarak uygun değillerdir. Travma veya ablasyon kanser cerrahisine bağlı defektleri olan hastalara implant tutuculu fonksiyonel ve estetik restorasyonlar, kraniofasiyal iskelete osseoentegrasyonun temel ilkeleri uygulanarak önerilebilinir. Vakada; gaz ocağı yanığına bağlı olarak sağ kulağını kaybeden 13 yaşındaki bayan hastaya, cerrahi rezeksiyon sonrası 2 adet ekstraoral implant uygulaması ardından implant destekli silikon protez yapımı sunuldu. Bu olguda implant kullanımının, kulak protezinin hasta tarafından kolay takılıp-çıkartılabildiği ve dolayısı ile hastanın protezi kabullenmesini kolaylaştırdığı gözlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAY, A., UZEL, G., GÜNAY, Y. (2013). Implant supported auricular prostheses: Case report. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4, 314–317. https://ajindex.com/articles/216199

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Branemark, PI., Zarb GA, Albrentsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1985: 25-47
  2. Nishimura RD, Roumanas E, Sugal T, Moy PK. Auricular prostheses and osseointegrated implants. UCLA experience. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 75: 553-8
  3. Chang TL, Garrett N, Roumanas E, Beumer J. Treatment satisfaction with facial prostheses, J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 275-80
  4. Saraçoğlu B, Zulfikar H, Atay A, Gunay, Y. Treatment Outcome of Extraoral Implants in the Carniofacial Region J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21: 751-758
  5. Beumer j, Curtis TA, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial rehabi- litation: prosthodontic and surgical considerations. St.Louis: Medico Dental Media Intl, 1996: 81-83, 444- 449
  6. Atay A, Karayazgan B, Günay Y, Oruç S. Kulak protezi yapımı: farklı bir teknikle, Gülhane Med J 2009; 51: 122-125
  7. Parel SM, Branemark PI, Tjellstrom A. Osseointegration in maxillofacial prosthetics. Part II: extraoral applications. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 600-606
  8. Tolman DE, Taylor PF. Bone-anchored craniofacial prosthesis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 159-168
  9. Gitto CA, Plata WG, Schaaf NG. Evaluation of the peri implant epithelial tissue of percutaneous implant abutments supporting maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Oral maxillofac Impl 1994; 9: 197-206
  10. Roumanas ED, Freymiller EG, Chang TL, et al. Implant- retained prostheses for facial defects: an up to 14-year follow-up report on the survival rates of implants at UCLA. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 325-322
  11. Tjellström A, Yontchev E, Lindström J, Branemark Pl. Five-years’ experience with bone-anchored auricular prostheses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93: 366- 372
  12. Jacobsson M, Tjellstrom A, Fine L,et al. A retrospective study of osseointegrated skin-penetrating titanium fixtures used for retaining facial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 523-528.