Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

The Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Status of Elderly Patients on the Postoperative Outcome: Comparison of Two Nutritional Assessment Tests and Biochemical Tools

Pages
333–338
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION Measurements with easy-to-perform tests will provide guidance in terms of identifying potential perioperative risks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS Our main goal was to compare the two validated nutritional screening tools and serum proteins that are used as routine biochemical markers for the prediction of the postoperative outcome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On admission to the preoperative holding area, all patients underwent the two nutritional screening tests: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS − 2002).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION Measurements with easy-to-perform tests will provide guidance in terms of identifying potential perioperative risks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS Our main goal was to compare the two validated nutritional screening tools and serum proteins that are used as routine biochemical markers for the prediction of the postoperative outcome. MATERIAL and METHODS The current study was design to evaluate the prevalence of malnutrition among elderly patients undergoing elective curative gastrointestinal cancer and trochanteric hip fracture surgery. On admission to the preoperative holding area, all patients underwent the two nutritional screening tests: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS − 2002). After assessment, all participants were followed-up throughout their hospital stay. We calculated the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) and albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) according to the laboratory results. The surgical outcome (discharge to ward/intensive care) and postoperative infection (systemic or surgical site) were recorded. RESULTS The group of patients with MNA 17. The mean serum albumin and globulin levels and the AGR was comparable between before and after the surgery. However, the mean LMR was significantly lower than the preoperative value. CONCLUSION Measurements with easy-to-perform tests will provide guidance in terms of identifying potential perioperative risks.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZEN, Ö., ÇEVİK, B. (2020). The Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Status of Elderly Patients on the Postoperative Outcome: Comparison of Two Nutritional Assessment Tests and Biochemical Tools. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 333–338. https://ajindex.com/articles/216012

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. 1 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health 2. Evans C. Malnutrition in the Elderly: A multifactorial Failure to Thrive. Perm J 2005
  2. 9(3): 38-41. [Crossref] 3. Klestil T, Röder C, Stotter C, Winkler B, Nehrer S, Lutz M, et al. Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2018
  3. 8(1): 13933. [Crossref] 4. Malafarina V, Reginster JY, Cabrerizo S, Bruyere O, Kanis JA, Martinez JA, et al. Nutritional Status and Nutritional Treatment Are Related to Outcomes and Mortality in Older Adults with Hip Fracture. Nutrients 2018
  4. 10(5): 555. [Crossref] 5. Zhang, X, Tang T, Pang L, Sharma SV, Li R, Nyitray AG, et al. Malnutrition and overall survival in older adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 2019
  5. 10(6): 874 - 83. [Crossref] 6. Correia MI, Waitzberg DL. The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr 2003
  6. 22(3): 235-9. [Crossref] 7. Nutrition Module: 5. Nutritional Assessment. https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=318&printable=1. (Access date:03.01.2020) 8. Yürüyen M, Yavuzer H, Yavuzer S, Cengiz M, Demirdağ F, Kara Z, et al. Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predicting sarcopenia in hospitalized patients. Turk J Med Sci 2017
  7. [Crossref] 9. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2003
  8. 22(4): 415-21. [Crossref] 10. Cereda E. Mini Nutritional Assessment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2012
  9. 15(1): 29-41. [Crossref] 11. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H, Morley JE, Kritchevsky SB, Vellas B. Frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice expert opinion of a geriatric advisory panel. J Nutr Health Aging 2008
  10. 12(1): 29-37. [Crossref] 12. Keller U. Nutritional Laboratory Markers in Malnutrition. J Clin Med 2019
  11. 8(6): 775. [Crossref] 13. Zhang Y, Wang L, Lin S, Wang R. Preoperative albumin-to-globulin ratio as a significant prognostic indicator in urologic cancers: a meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res 2018
  12. [Crossref] 14. Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G, Soto ME, Rolland Y, Guigoz Y, et al. Overview of the MNA-its history and challenges. J Nutr Health Aging 2006
  13. 10(6): 456-63. 15. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M, Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral