Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Digital and Extradigital Glomus Tumors: A Clinicopathological Analysis

Pages
323–326
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The differential diagnosis of painful and painless subcutaneous nodules in any location should include GTs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS Glomus tumors (GTs) refer to a rare group of perivascular tumors that usually affect the digital region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESULTS Total 16 patients were enrolled, including 9 men and 7 women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The differential diagnosis of painful and painless subcutaneous nodules in any location should include GTs.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:8 specimens
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS Glomus tumors (GTs) refer to a rare group of perivascular tumors that usually affect the digital region. The lesions are histologically composed of vessels and glomus cells in varying proportions. The present study was designed to reveal the clinicopathological findings of the entity. MATERIAL and METHODS We reviewed the demographic, clinical, and histopathological features of the patients with GTs who were admitted to our tertiary center in the previous decade. RESULTS Total 16 patients were enrolled, including 9 men and 7 women. The mean patient age was 57.8 y. The most common location was the finger followed by other locations that included the chest wall (2), elbow (1), forearm (1), nose (1), anterior abdominal wall (1), hip (1), back (1), thigh (1), knee (1), and foot (1). Seven patients presented with pain and localized tenderness. Subungual involvement was more common among women (4). All the lesions were solitary, soft in consistency, yellowish/brown in color, and regular in shape with smooth contours. The size of the lesions ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 cm (average size: 1.25 cm). Histopathologically, the patients were classified into 3 main types, including solid type, glomangioma type, and glomangiomyoma type. Edematous and extensive myxoid stromal changes were found in 4 patients. Immunhistochemical study was performed to support the diagnosis in 8 patients. Ki-67 expressions were “low” for all 8 specimens. All the patients were treated with total excision, and there was no recurrence in any case during at least 1 y of follow-up. CONCLUSION Extradigital GTs are more common than digital tumors. It should be kept in mind that a glomus tumor has the ability to involve different sites in the body. The differential diagnosis of painful and painless subcutaneous nodules in any location should include GTs.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİLİTCİ, A., ELMAS, Ö. F., TUNCER, K. (2020). Digital and Extradigital Glomus Tumors: A Clinicopathological Analysis. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 323–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/216011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Schiefer TK, Parker WL, Anakwenze OA, Amadio PC, Inwards CY, Spinner RJ. Extradigital glomus tumors: a 20-year experience. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81(10): 1337-44. [Crossref] 2. Santoshi JA, Kori VK, Khurana U. Glomus tumor of the fingertips: A frequently missed diagnosis. J Family Med Prim Care 2019; 8(3): 904-8. [Crossref] 3. Venugopal PR. Extradigital Glomus Tumor-a Rare Cause for Undiagnosed Chronic Pain in Unusal Sites. Indian J Surg 2015; 77(3): 910- 2. [Crossref] 4. Sbai MA, Benzarti S, Gharbi W, Khoffi W, Maalla R. Glomus tumor of the leg: a case report. Pan Afr Med J 2018; 31: 186. [Crossref] 5. Shin DK, Kim MS, Kim SW, Kim SH. A Painful glomus tumor on the pulp of the distal phalanx. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010; 48: 185-7. [Crossref] 6. Kim MG, Lee DY, Lee JH, Yang JM, Lee ES, Kim WS. A clinical and histopathologic analysis of 27 cases of glomus tumors. Korean J Dermatol 2006; 44(3): 267-73. 7. Beksaç K, Dogan L, Bozdogan N, Dilek G, Akgul GG, Ozaslan C. Extradigital Glomus Tumor of Thigh. Case Rep Surg 2015; 2015: 638283. [Crossref] 8. Morey VM, Garg B, Kotwal PP. Glomus tumours of the hand: review of literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2016; 7(4): 286-91. [Crossref] 9. Samaniego E, Crespo A, Sanz A. Key diagnostic features and treatment of subungual glomus tumor. Actas Dermosifiliogr (English Edition) 2009; 100(10): 875-82. [Crossref] 10. Kim SH, Suh HS, Choi JH, Sung KJ, Moon KC, Koh JK. Glomus tumor: a clinical and histopathologic analysis of 17 cases. Ann Dermatol 2000; 12(2): 95-101. [Crossref] 11. Moojen TM, Houpt P. Glomus tumors of the hand in the Netherlands: analysis of 107 patients. Eur J Plast Surg 2000; 23(4): 224-6. [Crossref] 12. Frumuseanu B, Balanescu R, Ulici A, Golumbeanu M, Barbu M, Orita V, et al. A new case of lower extremity glomus tumor up-to date review and case report. J Med Life 2012; 5(2): 211. 13. Goldblum JR, Folpe AL, Weiss SW. Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft tissue tumors. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier-Saunders; 2014. 14. Calonje JE, Brenn T, Lazar AJ, McKee PH. Pathology of the Skin E-Book. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011. p. 1746-8. 15. Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M, Weiss SW. Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25(1): 1-12. [Crossref]