Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Recursive neural network model for analysis and forecast of PM10 and PM2.5

Pages
652–659
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The comparison between observed and forecasted PM2.5 shows that the neural network is able to forecast the PM2.5 concentrations even if PM2.5 is not included among the input parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Atmospheric particulate matter(PM) is one of the pollutant that may havea significant impacton human health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Measured meteorological parameters and PM10 concentration are used as input to forecast the daily averaged concentration of PM10 from one to three days ahead.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The comparison between observed and forecasted PM2.5 shows that the neural network is able to forecast the PM2.5 concentrations even if PM2.5 is not included among the input parameters.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Atmospheric particulate matter(PM) is one of the pollutant that may havea significant impacton human health. Data collected during three years in an urban area of the Adriatic coast are analysed using three models: a multiple linear regression model, a neural network model with and without recursive architecture. Measured meteorological parameters and PM10 concentration are used as input to forecast the daily averaged concentration of PM10 from one to three days ahead. All simulations show that the neural network with recursive architecture has better performances compared to both the multiple linear regression model and the neural network model without the recursive architecture. Results of PM forecasts are compared with the air quality limits for health protection to test the performance as operational tool. The inclusion of carbon monoxide (CO) concentration as further input parameter in the model, has been evaluated in terms of forecast improvements. Finally, all models are used to forecast the PM2.5 concentration, using as input the meteorological data, the PM10 and COconcentration, tosimulate the situation when PM2.5 is not observed. The comparison between observed and forecasted PM2.5 shows that the neural network is able to forecast the PM2.5 concentrations even if PM2.5 is not included among the input parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİANCOFİORE, F., BUSİLACCHİO, M., VERDECCHİA, M., TOMASSETTİ, B., ARUFFO, E., BİANCO, S., TOMMASO, S. D., COLANGELİ, C., ROSATELLİ, G., CARLO, P. D. (2017). Recursive neural network model for analysis and forecast of PM10 and PM2.5. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 652–659. https://ajindex.com/articles/215469

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abderrahim, H., Chellali, M.R., Hamou, A., 2016. Forecasting PM10 in Algiers: efficacyof multilayer perceptronnetworks. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23,1634e1641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5406-6.
  2. Amodio, M., Andriani, E., de Gennaro, G., Demarinis Loiotile, A., Di Gilio, A., Piacentino, M.C., 2012. An integrated approach to identify the origin of PM10 exceedances. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.19, 3132e3141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11356-012-0804-5. Biancofiore, F., Verdecchia, M., Di Carlo, P., Tomassetti, B., Aruffo, E., Busilacchio, M., Bianco, S., Di Tommaso, S., Colangeli, C., 2015. Analysis of surface ozone using a recurrent neural network. Sci. Total. Environ. 514, 379e387. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.106. Braspenning, P.J., Thuijsman, F., Weijters, A.J.M.M.,1995. Artificial Neural Networks: an Introduction to ANN Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, London. Di Carlo, P., Pitari, G., Mancini, E., Gentile, S., Pichelli, E., Visconti, G., 2007. Evolution of surface ozone in central Italy based on observations and statistical model. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D10316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007900.
  3. Carnevale, C., Pisoni, E., Volta, M., 2010. A non-linear analysis to detect the origin of PM10 concentrations in Northern Italy. Sci. Total. Environ. 409,182e191. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.038. Comrie, A.C., 1997. Comparing neural networks and regression models for ozone forecasting. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 47, 653e663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10473289.1997.10463925. Corani, G., 2005. Air quality prediction in Milan: feed-forward neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning. Ecol. Model. 185, 513e529. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.008. Cristofanelli, P., Di Carlo, P., D’ Altorio, A., Dari Salisburgo, C., Tuccella, P., Biancofiore, P., Stocchi, P., Verza, G.P., Landi, T.C., Marinoni, A., Calzolari, F., Duchi, R., Bonasoni, P., 2013. Analysis of summer ozone observations at a high mountain site in Central Italy (campo imperatore, 2388 m a.s.l.). Pure Appl. Geophys. 170, 1985e1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0630-1.
  4. Dockery, D.W., Pope, C.A., 1994. Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. Ann. Rev. Publ. Health 15, 107e132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.pu.15.050194.000543. Dockery,D.W.,Pope,C.A.,Xu,X.,Spengle,J.,Ware,J.,Fay,M.,Ferris,B.,Speizer,F.,1993. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 1