Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Effects of low boundary walls under dynamic inflow on flow field and pollutant dispersion in an idealized street canyon

Pages
564–575
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the flow field under dynamic inflow inside the idealized street canyon within LBWs is composed of a major eddy and three corner eddies at the street level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we examine the magnitude of the boundary layer inflow that gradually changes with time at the top of a building.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the external wind speed drops, the air is expanded, regarding which the canyon from air expansion is approximately 11 m high at time t ¼ 25 min and 3 m at time t ¼ 33 min.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the flow field under dynamic inflow inside the idealized street canyon within LBWs is composed of a major eddy and three corner eddies at the street level.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, we examine the magnitude of the boundary layer inflow that gradually changes with time at the top of a building. A standard k-ε model was used to study how low boundary walls (LBWs) under dynamic wind field and dynamic vehicle flow affect the dispersion of pollutants in an idealized street canyon. The results show that the flow field under dynamic inflow inside the idealized street canyon within LBWs is composed of a major eddy and three corner eddies at the street level. When the external wind speed drops, the air is expanded, regarding which the canyon from air expansion is approximately 11 m high at time t ¼ 25 min and 3 m at time t ¼ 33 min. The air at the road corners is correspondingly expanded. The presence of LBWs increases the peak of pollutant concentrations in the canyon and alters the pollutant distribution at the canyon bottom under the dynamic flow at different time points. In the LBWs street canyon compared with the non-LBWs street canyon, the pollutant concentration peaks at time t ¼ 25, 29, and 33 min increase by 12.74%, 30.90% and 22.80%, respectively. The presence of LBWs significantly decreases the maximum x-direction wind speeds at 1-m height in the bottom canyon at different time points but alters the wind directions at the corners and changes the value and distribution of turbulent kinetic energy in the canyon. The largest leeward and windward y-direction wind speeds under dynamic inflow are 27.41% and 32.75% compared with under steady inflow.

🔖

Cite This Article

WANG, L., Pan, Q., Zheng, X., Yang, S. (2017). Effects of low boundary walls under dynamic inflow on flow field and pollutant dispersion in an idealized street canyon. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 564–575. https://ajindex.com/articles/215465

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Zhang, Y.W., Gu, Z.L., Cheng, Y., Lee, S.C., 2011. Effect of real-time boundary wind conditions on the air flow and pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon-Large eddy simulations. Atmos. Environ. 45, 3352e3359. Xie, X., Huang, Z., Wang, J., Xie, Z., 2005. The impact of solar radiation and street layout on pollutant dispersion in street canyon. Build. Environ. 40, 201e212. Vos, P.E.J., Maiheu, B., Vankerkom, J., Janssen, S., 2013. Improving local air quality in cities: to tree or not to tree? Environ. Pollut. 183, 113e122. Venegas, L.E., Mazzeo, N.A., 2000. Carbon monoxide concentration in a street canyon of buenos aires city (Argentina). Environ. Monit. Assess. 65, 417e423. Uehara, K., Murakami, S., Oikawa, S., Wakamatsu, S., 2000. Wind tunnel experi-ments on how thermal stratification affects flow in and above urban street canyons. Atmos. Environ. 34, 1553e1562. Tong, Z., Baldauf, R.W., Isakov, V., Deshmukh, P., Max, Z.K., 2015. Roadside vegeta-tion barrier designs to mitigate near-road air pollution impacts. Sci. Total En-viron. 541, 920e927. Tominaga, Y., Stathopoulos, T., 2007. Turbulent schmidt numbers for cfd analysis with various types of flowfield. Atmos. Environ. 41, 8091e8099. Tiwary, A., Kumar, P., 2014. Impact evaluation of greenegrey infrastructure inter-action on built-space integrity: an emerging perspective to urban ecosystem service. Sci. Total Environ. 487, 350e360. Steffens, J.T., Heist, D.K., Perry, S.G., Zhang, K.M., 2013. Modeling the effects of a solid barrier on pollutant dispersion under various atmospheric stability conditions. Atmos. Environ. 69, 76e85. Schulte, N., Snyder, M., Isakov, V., Heist, D., Venkatram, A., 2014. Effects of solid barriers on dispersion of roadway emissions. Atmos. Environ. 97, 286e295. Schatzmann, M., Leitl, B., Liedtke, J., 2000. Dispersion in urban environments; comparison of field measurements with wind tunnel results. Environ. Monit. Assess. 65, 249e257. Salmond, J.A., Williams, D.E., Laing, G., Kingham, S., Dirks, K., Longley, I., Henshawc, G.S., 2013. The influence of vegetation on the horizontal and vertical distribution of pollutants in a street canyon. Sci. Total Environ. 443, 287e298. Salim, S.M., Buccolieri, R., Chan, A., Sabatino, S.D., 2011. Numerical simulation of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon: comparison be-tween rans and les. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod 99, 103e113. Ng, W.Y., Chau, C.K., 2014. A modeling investigation of the impact of street and building con