SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses

Mustafa SEÇİL
Gökhan UÇAR
Çağın ŞENTÜRK
Şebnem KARASU
OĞUZ DİCLE
Pages
69–73
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RESULTS An overall number of 521 publications were found originating from 4,413 presentations (11.81%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE To investigate the publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish radiology congresses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS The abstracts of presentations at Turkish national radiology congresses between 1995-2002 were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RESULTS An overall number of 521 publications were found originating from 4,413 presentations (11.81%).
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Radyoloji · Kongreler · Süreli yayınlar

Abstract

PURPOSE To investigate the publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish radiology congresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS The abstracts of presentations at Turkish national radiology congresses between 1995-2002 were reviewed. According to the congress abstract booklets, types of the presentation (oral or poster presentation), as well as body system-based categorization were used. The presentations were searched for publication in Medline® indexed journals using the PubMed® server. The rates of publication of the abstracts, the journals in which the presentations have been published and the time between the presentation and publication were investigated. RESULTS An overall number of 521 publications were found originating from 4,413 presentations (11.81%). The publication numbers of 2,116 scientific research, 1,995 case report and 302 educational exhibit type presentations were 261 (12.33%), 249 (12.49%) and 11 (3.64%), respectively. For oral presentations the publication ratio was found as 15.38% (116/754) and for posters it was 11.06% (405/3,659). The number of presentations and the number of publications were found to increase by years, however the ratio of publication to presentation remained the same. Mean time to publication was calculated as 24.4 months. In frequency of publication, Tanisal ve Girisimsel Radyoloji, European Radiology, European Journal of Radiology were the first three publication media of the presentations. CONCLUSION The publication rates of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses are lower than the previously reported publication rates in radiology and other specialties.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEÇİL, M., UÇAR, G., ŞENTÜRK, Ç., KARASU, Ş., DİCLE, O. (2005). Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 69–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/215321

References (15)

  1. Arrive L, Boelle PY, Dono P, Lewin M, Monnier-Cholley L, Tubiana JM. Subsequent publication of orally presented original studies within 5 years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Radiology 2004; 232:101-106
  2. Bydder AS, Joseph DJ, Spry NA. Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual scientific meetings: how does the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists compare? Australas Radiol 2004; 48:25-28
  3. Marx WF, Cloft HJ, Do HM, Kallmes DF. The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in perr-reviewed, indexed journals. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:1173-1177
  4. De Bellefeuille C, Morrison CA, Tannock IF. The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. Ann Oncol 1992; 3:187-191
  5. Walby A, Kelly AM, Georgakas C. Abstract to publication ratio for papers presented at scientific meetings: how does emergency medicine compare? Emerg Med 2001; 13:460-464
  6. Roy D, Sankar V, Hughes JP, Jones A, Fenton JE. Publication rates of scientific papers presented at the otolaryngological research society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol 2001; 26:253-256
  7. Davis M, Wilson CS. Research contributions in ophthalmology: Australia’s productivity.Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003; 31:286-293
  8. Yentis SM, Campbell GA, Lerman J. Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40:632-634
  9. Timmer A, Blum T, Lankisch PG. Publication rates following pancreas meetings. Pancreas 2001; 23:212-215
  10. Byerly WG, Rheney CC, Connely JF, Verzino KC. Publication rates of abstracts from two pharmacy meetings. Ann Pharmacother 2000; 34:1123-1127
  11. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert C, et al. Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 1992; 267:374-378
  12. Weber EJ, Callaham ML, Wears RL, Barton C, Young G. Unpublished research from a medical speciality meeting. JAMA 1998; 280:257-259
  13. Scherer RW, Langenberg P. Full results published in abstracts of Cochrane Methodology Review, Issue 1. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Library, 2003
  14. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272:158-162
  15. Akhan O. Our journal is being indexed in Index Medicus: what to do next? Tani Girisim Radyol 2003; 9:399-400.