Journals / Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Vaginismusu olan kadınlarda bağlanma stilleri

Attachment styles in women with vaginismus

Pages
37–43
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: These findings taken together support the notion that insecure attachment may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of vaginismus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Attachment styles reflect individual differences in beliefs about oneself and others, interpersonal functioning and close relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Our sample was included 56 patients with vaginismus and 51 healthy women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: These findings taken together support the notion that insecure attachment may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of vaginismus.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Attachment styles reflect individual differences in beliefs about oneself and others, interpersonal functioning and close relationships. This study intended to investigate attachment styles of vaginismus patients. Methods: Our sample was included 56 patients with vaginismus and 51 healthy women. Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction Scale (GRISS) and Relationship Scales Questionnaire (RSQ) were administered to the patients and healthy control group. Results: The scores of the vaginismus group for secure attachment scores were statistically significantly lower than the healthy control group while there was no difference between the groups for the fearful, preoccupied and dismissive attachment subscale scores. GRISS total and subscale scores were statistically higher in women with an insecure attachment style when the total sample as divided into two groups as secure and insecure attached individuals. Conclusions: These findings taken together support the notion that insecure attachment may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of vaginismus.

Özet

Amaç: Bağlanma stilleri bireyin kendi ve diğerleri hakkında inançları, kişilerarası işlevleri ve yakın ilişkilerindeki bireysel farklılıkları yansıtır. Bu çalışmada vajinismus hastalarında bağlanma stillerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Örneklemimiz vajinismus tanısı konan 56 hasta ve 51 sağlıklı kadından oluşmaktadır. Hasta ve sağlıklı kontrol grubuna Golombok Rust Cinsel Doyum Ölçeği (GRCDÖ) ve İlişki Ölçekleri Anketi uygulandı. Bulgular: Vajinismus grubunda güvenli bağlanma puanları sağlıklı kontrol grubundan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı biçimde daha düşükken, korkulu, saplantılı ve kayıtsız güvensiz bağlanma alt ölçek puanları arasında fark yoktu. Tüm örneklem güvenli ve güvensiz bağlanan bireyler olarak iki gruba ayrıldığında, GRCDÖ toplam ve alt ölçek puanları güvensiz bağlanan kadınlarda daha yüksekti. Tartışma: Bu sonuçlar bir arada ele alındığında güvensiz bağlanmanın vajinismus pato-genezinde önemli olabileceğini desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, Ö., ELBOZAN, B. C., KARLIDAĞ, R., ÜNAL, S., MUTLU, E. A., KARTALCI, Ş. (2015). Vaginismusu olan kadınlarda bağlanma stilleri. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 37–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/215223

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Text Revision. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
  2. Basson R, Leiblum S, Brotto L, Derogatis L, Four- croy J, Fugl-Meyer K, et al. Revised definitions of women's sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med 2004; 1:40-48.
  3. Basson R, Leiblum S, Brotto L, Derogatis L, Four- croy J, Fugl-Meyer K, et al. Definitions of women's sexual dysfunction reconsidered: advocating ex- pansion and revision. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 24:221-229.
  4. Reissing ED, Binik YM, Khalife S, Cohen D, Amsel R. Vaginalspasm, pain, andbehavior: an empirical investigation of the diagnosis of vaginismus. Arch Sex Behav 2004; 33:5-17.
  5. Asmundson GJ, Taylor S. Role of anxiety sensi- tivity in pain-related fear and avoidance. J Behav Med 1996; 19:577-586.
  6. Reissing ED, Binik YM, Khalife S. Does vaginis- mus exist? A critical reiew of the literature. J Nerv Ment Dis 1999; 187:261-274.
  7. Van der Velde J, Laan E, Everaerd W. Vaginis- mus, a component of a general defensive action: An investigation of pelvic flor muscle activity dur- ing exposure to emotion inducing film excerpts in women with and without vaginismus. Int Uro- gynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001; 12:328-331.
  8. Pukall C, Lahaie M, Binik Y. Sexual pain disor- ders: Etiologic factors. I Goldstein, CM Meston, S Davis Traish, (Eds.), Women's Sexual Functional Dysfunction: Study, Diagnosis and Treatment. UK: Taylor and Francis, 2005.
  9. Lahaie MA, Binik YM, Amsel R, Khalife S. Fear and pain vs. musclespasm as the main diagnostic criteria for vaginismus. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Sex Therapy and Research, Chicago, 2008.
  10. Soylu A, Yılmaz U, Karlıdağ R, Özcan C, Ünal S, Baydinç C. Vaginismus: possible role of the sym- pathetic nervous system. ISSWSH International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Healts Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, 2002. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss. London: Hogarth Press, 1969.
  11. Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptu- alized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 52:511-524. Cassidy J. The nature of the child's ties. J Cassidy, PR Shaver, (Eds.), Handbook of Attach- ment. New York: Guilford Press, 1999, p.3-20. Bowbly J. Attachment and Loss. Second ed., New York: Basic Books, 1982.
  12. Zimmermann P, Becker-Stoll F. Stability of attach- ment representations during adolescence: the influence of ego-identity status. J Adolesc 2002; 25:107-124.
  13. Griffin D, Bartholomew K.