SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of the Entomological Research Society / 2010 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

A review of the tribe Halyini in Turkey (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) with two new records: Apodiphus integriceps and Mustha vicina

MERAL FENT
AHMET DURSUN
YUSUF KARSAVURAN
SERDAR TEZCAN
OZAN DEMİRÖZER
Pages
1–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the distribution of the tribe Halyini in Turkey was presented by ascertaining the exact identification of some species given with wrong information in previous studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The tribe Halyini Amyot & Serville, 1843 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) which has been represented in Turkey so far by 6 species from 3 genera is reviewed and identification keys, morphological figures and the distributional patterns in Turkey and Palaearctic region of the formerly determined species (Carenoplistus acutus (Signoret, 1880), Apodiphus amygdali (Germar, 1817), Mustha spinosula (Lefebvre, 1831), M. longispinis Reuter, 1890, M. izmirensis Memon & Ahmad, 2008) as well as of two new records (Apodiphus integriceps Horváth, 1888 and Mustha vicina Hoberlandt, 1997) are given.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Previously recorded M. incana Stål, 1876 in Turkish Heteroptera fauna is proved to be actually M. vicina and therefore M. incana is excluded from the faunal list of the Turkish Heteroptera.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the distribution of the tribe Halyini in Turkey was presented by ascertaining the exact identification of some species given with wrong information in previous studies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Pentatomidae · Türkiye · fauna

Abstract

The tribe Halyini Amyot & Serville, 1843 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) which has been represented in Turkey so far by 6 species from 3 genera is reviewed and identification keys, morphological figures and the distributional patterns in Turkey and Palaearctic region of the formerly determined species (Carenoplistus acutus (Signoret, 1880), Apodiphus amygdali (Germar, 1817), Mustha spinosula (Lefebvre, 1831), M. longispinis Reuter, 1890, M. izmirensis Memon & Ahmad, 2008) as well as of two new records (Apodiphus integriceps Horváth, 1888 and Mustha vicina Hoberlandt, 1997) are given. The possibility of introduction of A. integriceps to Turkey with plant saplings and thus its alien status is discussed. Previously recorded M. incana Stål, 1876 in Turkish Heteroptera fauna is proved to be actually M. vicina and therefore M. incana is excluded from the faunal list of the Turkish Heteroptera. Furthermore, the distribution of the tribe Halyini in Turkey was presented by ascertaining the exact identification of some species given with wrong information in previous studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

FENT, M., DURSUN, A., KARSAVURAN, Y., TEZCAN, S., DEMİRÖZER, O. (2010). A review of the tribe Halyini in Turkey (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) with two new records: Apodiphus integriceps and Mustha vicina. Journal of the Entomological Research Society, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 1–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/215024

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahmad, I., Memon, N., 2002, A new Halyine species of Carenoplistus Jakovlev from Karachi, Sindh (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 34: 205-207.
  2. Bolu H., Özgen, İ., Fent, M., 2006,
  3. Diyarbakır, Elazığ ve Mardin İlleri Badem Ağaçlarında Bulunan Pentatomidae (Heteroptera) Türleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,
  4. Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 16: 25-28.
  5. Derjanschi V., Pericart, J., 2005, Fauna de France. Hémipterès Pentatomoidea Euro-Méditerranéens. Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles. Paris, 1: 494 pp. Dursun, A., Kartal, V., 2008, Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi Halyini Amyot & Serville, 1843, Sciocorini Amyot & Serville, 1843, Aeliini Douglas & Scott, 1865 ve Eysarcorini Mulsant & Rey, 1866 (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae) türleri üzerine faunistik bir araştırma. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 32: 303-315.
  6. Fahringer, J. 1922, Eine Rynchotenausbeute aus der Türkei, Kleinasien und benachbarten Gebieten. Konowia, 1: 137-144, 296-307.
  7. Fent, M., Aktaç, N., 1999, Edirne Yöresi Pentatomidae (Heteroptera) Faunası Üzerine Taksonomik ve Sistematik Araştırmalar. Turkish. Journal of Zoology, 23: 377-395.
  8. Fent, M., Aktaç, N., 2008, Anmerkungen zu einigen im Adultstadium Überwinternden Heteropteren und ihrer Überwinterungsplätze in der (Türkischen) Provinz Edirne. Heteropteron, 28: 11-15.
  9. Escherich, K., 1897, Beitrag zur Hemipterenfauna Kleinasiens. Entomologische Nachrichten, 23: 124-127.
  10. Ghauri, M. S. K., 1977, A Revision of Apodiphus Spinola (Heteroptera:Pentatomidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 67: 97-106.
  11. Hoberlandt, L., 1955, Results of the zoological scientific expedition of the National Museum in Praha to Turkey. Acta Entomologica Museum Nationalis Pragae 3: 162-263.
  12. Hoberlandt, L., 1997, Results of the Czechoslovak-Iranian Entomological Expeditions to Iran 1970, 1973, and 1977. Heteroptera: Acanthasomatidae, Cydnidae, Scutelleridae, Pentatomidae. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Prage, 44 (1995): 181-293. Horváth, G., 1883, Heteroptera Anatolica in regione Brussae collecta enumeravit. Természetrajzi Füzetek, 7:21-30. Horváth, G., 1890, Conspectus specierum generis Mustha (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Revue d’Entomologie, 9: 262-264. Horváth, G., 1901, Hémiptères du voyage de M. Martinez Escalera dans I’Asie Mineure. Természetrajzi Füzetek, 24: 469-485. Horváth, G., 1919, Ergebnisse einer mit Unterstützung der Kais. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien ausgeführten zoologischen Forschungsreise von we