Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Modeling and optimization of simultaneous degradation of rhodamine B and acid red 14 binary solution by homogeneous Fenton reaction: a chemometrics approach

Pages
987–1001
Publication Date
2020-08-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the optimum point of operation ([Fe2+] = 143.88 mg/L, [H2O2] = 126.89 mg/L and pH = 3.71), degradation efficiencies of RB and AR14 were found as 81.58% and 80.22%, respectively, which were nearly identical to the experimental results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aimed to propose a mathematical method to investigate and optimize the simultaneous elimination process of multiple organic pollutants using the Fenton process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence, the treatment of rhodamine B (RB) and acid red 14 (AR14) dyes in their binary solution was studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the optimum point of operation ([Fe2+] = 143.88 mg/L, [H2O2] = 126.89 mg/L and pH = 3.71), degradation efficiencies of RB and AR14 were found as 81.58% and 80.22%, respectively, which were nearly identical to the experimental results.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Acid red 14 · desirability function · fenton reaction

Abstract

The study aimed to propose a mathematical method to investigate and optimize the simultaneous elimination process of multiple organic pollutants using the Fenton process. Hence, the treatment of rhodamine B (RB) and acid red 14 (AR14) dyes in their binary solution was studied. Multivariate curve resolution alternating least square (MCR-ALS), a novel chemometric method, was applied along with correlation constraints to resolute the UV-Vis spectrophotometric data, enabling quantification of investigated dyes despite a high spectral overlapping. Response surface methodology was adopted to assess the model and optimize individual and interactive effects of three independent factors (Fe2+, H2O2 and initial pH) on the simultaneous elimination of RB and AR14. The values of the regression coefficient for RB and AR14 were determined as 98.48 and 98.67 percent, respectively, revealing the reliability of the obtained polynomial models to predict decolorization efficiencies. Desirability function was employed to optimize the independent variables to attain the highest possible degradation performance for both dyes in their binary solution. At the optimum point of operation ([Fe2+] = 143.88 mg/L, [H2O2] = 126.89 mg/L and pH = 3.71), degradation efficiencies of RB and AR14 were found as 81.58% and 80.22%, respectively, which were nearly identical to the experimental results.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALİASGHARLOU, N., BAHRAM, M., ZOLFAGHARİ, P., MOHSENİ, N. (2020). Modeling and optimization of simultaneous degradation of rhodamine B and acid red 14 binary solution by homogeneous Fenton reaction: a chemometrics approach. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 987–1001. https://ajindex.com/articles/214922

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akkaya GK, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P2343, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1846-0 Aleksic M, 2010,
  2. DESALINATION, V257, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.016 Basturk E, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109300 Berradi M, 2019,
  3. HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02711 Bilinska L, 2016, CHEM ENG J, V306, P550, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.100 Bouafia-Chergui S, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V33, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1192 Chen BL, 2020, CHEM ENG J, V380, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122531 Dukkanci M, 2016, TURK J CHEM, V40, P784, DOI 10.3906/kim-1602-59 Elhalil A, 2016, WATER RESOUR IND, V15, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.wri.2016.07.002 Fathinia M, 2015, SPECTROCHIM ACTA A, V136, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.saa.2014.10.014 Garrido M, 2008, ANAL BIOANAL CHEM, V390, P2059, DOI 10.1007/s00216-008-1955-6 Garrido-Ramirez EG, 2010, APPL CLAY SCI, V47, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.clay.2009.11.044 Gomes FM, 2019, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V179, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002 Hasanzadeh M, 2020, J IND ENG CHEM, V81, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.031 Hassani A, 2017, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V5, P1964, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.032 Karimifard S, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V640, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.355 Kerkez D, 2018,
  4. TREATMENT WASTEWATER, DOI [10.24867/GRID-2018-p20, DOI 10.24867/GRID-2018-P20] Khaledian HR, 2019,
  5. MOLECULES, V24, DOI 10.3390/molecules24030383 Khan E, 2009, J HAZARD MATER, V161, P1024, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.049 Khataee A, 2016, J TAIWAN INST CHEM E, V65, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.04.036 Kumar V, 2020, WATER ENVIRON RES, V92, P211, DOI 10.1002/wer.1192 Le TT, 2016, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V216, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.077 Lellis B., 2019, BIOTECHNOL RES INNOV, V3, P275, DOI [10.1016/j., DOI 10.1016/J.BIORI.2019.09.001, 10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001.] Meng XS, 2019, MINER ENG, V132, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.11.054 Mohajeri S, 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V61, P1257, DOI 10.2166/wst.2010.018 Mohseni N, 2016, ANAL METHODS-UK, V8, P6739, DOI 10.1039/c6ay02091g Mohseni N, 2014, SPECTROCHIM ACTA A, V122, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.saa.2013.11.073 Moradi SE, 2017, TURK J CHEM, V41, P426, DOI 10.3906/kim-1607-5 Nateri AS, 2017, COLOR RES APPL, V42, P591, DOI 10.1002/col.22130 Nomura Y, 2020, J HAZARD MATER, V383, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121005 Oliveira JMS, 2020, J HAZARD MATER, V385, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121558 Pandey A, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V150, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.095 Rad LR, 2015, J TAIWAN INST CHEM E,