Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2011 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Kliniğimizde 2000-2010 yılları arasında normal kiloda ve makrozomik doğan bebeklerde perinatal ve maternal komplikasyonların doğum şekillerinin ve yenidoğan sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of perinatal and maternal complications type of deliveries and neonatal outcomes in macrosomic and normal weighed newborns in our clinic between 2000 and 2010 years

Pages
16–19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And this was statistically significant (p=0.0001).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perinatal and maternal complications, the type of the deliveries and neonatal outcomes in the patients whose newborns were weighing 4000gr and above (macrosomic) and between 2500-3999gr (normal).
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was done based upon the records of the patients who had given birth between 01.01.2000 and 31.06.2010 in Department of Obstetrics in Haydarpasa Numune Education and Research Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And this was statistically significant (p=0.0001).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perinatal and maternal complications, the type of the deliveries and neonatal outcomes in the patients whose newborns were weighing 4000gr and above (macrosomic) and between 2500-3999gr (normal). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was done based upon the records of the patients who had given birth between 01.01.2000 and 31.06.2010 in Department of Obstetrics in Haydarpasa Numune Education and Research Hospital. There were totally 9406 patients. We included 1331 patients to our study. In the study group (n=684) the newborns were weighing 4000 gr and above (macrosomic) and in the control group (n=647), who were selected randomly, the newborns were weighing 2500-3999gr (normal). The patients who had given birth before 37 weeks, the multiple gestations and intrauterin growth restricted babies were excluded from the control group. RESULTS: Of the 684 macrosomic newborns, 566 of them (82.7%) were 4000-4499 gr, 104 of them (15.2%) were 4500-4999gr and 14 of them (2.1%) were 5000gr and above. Maternal complications were seen 24.4% in the study group, whereas 7.7% in the control group. CONCLUSION: The risk of perinatal morbidity, maternal complications, birth trauma and neonatal complications were higher in the study group than in the control group. And this was statistically significant (p=0.0001).

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı 4000 gr ve üzeri (makrozomik) ve 2500-3999 gr (normal) yenidoğan ağırlığa sahip hastalarda perinatal ve maternal komplikasyonları, doğum şekillerini ve neonatal sonuçları değerlendirmekti. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Bu retrospektif çalışma 01.01.2000 ve 31.06.2010 tarihleri arasında Haydarpaşa Numune Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği’nde doğum yapan 9406 hastanın kayıtlarına göre yapıldı. Çalışmaya 1331 hasta dahil edildi. Çalışma grubuna 4000 gr ve üzeri (makrozomik) 684 hasta, kontrol grubuna rastgele seçilen 2500-3999 gr doğum ağrılığındaki 647 hasta alındı. Çalışmaya 37 haftadan önce doğum yapanlar, çoğul gebelikler ve intrauterin gelişme kısıtlılığı olan gebelikler dahil edilmedi. BULGULAR: Makrozomik bebeklerin (n=684) 566’sı (%82,7) 4000-4499 gr, 104’ü (%15,2) 4500-4999 gr ve 14’ü (%2,14) 5000 gr ve üzerindeydi. Çalışma grubunda maternal komplikasyonların görülme oranı %24,4 iken, kontrol grubunda bu oran %7,7 idi. SONUÇ: Perinatal morbidite, maternal komplikasyon, doğum travması ve neonatal komplikasyon riskleri çalışma grubunda kontrol grubuna göre daha fazla görülmüş olup istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır. (p=0,0001)

🔖

Cite This Article

AKA, N., ETİZ, S. S., YAŞLAK, Y., KÖSE, G., TÜFEKÇİ, C. (2011). Kliniğimizde 2000-2010 yılları arasında normal kiloda ve makrozomik doğan bebeklerde perinatal ve maternal komplikasyonların doğum şekillerinin ve yenidoğan sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 16–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/214855

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. American Collage of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Fetal macrosomia. Practice Bulletin No.22 Washington, DC:ACOG, 2000
  2. Henriksen T. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol 87:134,2008 3. Berard J. Dufour P. Vinatier D. et al. Fetal Macrosomia: risk factors and outcome A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 77:51,1998 4. Spellacy WN. Miller S. Winegar A. et al. Macrosomia maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 66:158, 1985 5. Chauhan SP. Lutton PM. Bailey KJ. et al. İntrapartum clinical, sonographic, and parous patients estimates of newborn birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 79:956,1992 6. Mark A. Zamorskı Wendy S. Bıggs. Management of Suspected Fetal Macrosomia. American Family Physician 63:302, 2001 7. Overpeck MD. Hediger ML. Zhang J. et al. Birthweight for gestational age of Mexican American infants born in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 93:943, 1999 8. Boyd ME. Usher RH. McLean FH. Fetal macrosomia: Prediction, risks, proposed management. Obstet Gynecol 61:715, 1983 9. Langer O. Berkus MD. Huff RW. et al. Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing> 4000 g be delivered by caesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:831, 1991 10. Oral E. Çağdaş A. Gezer A. et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes of fetal macrosomia. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 99: 167, 2001 11. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder dystocia. Guideline no.42. London:RCOG, 2005