Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2011 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Vulva kanserli kadınlarda safenöz venin korunduğu inguinal lenfadenektomi: Tek merkezde 10 yıllık deneyim

Sparing saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with vulvar cancer: A single center experience of 10 years

Pages
160–165
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Depending on the experience of the surgeon, the surgical strategy should be individualized and optimized for each patient with vulvar cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to investigate the short-and long-term morbidity associated with the preservation of saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with vulvar cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted in a total of 108 women who were diagnosed with vulvar cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Depending on the experience of the surgeon, the surgical strategy should be individualized and optimized for each patient with vulvar cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to investigate the short-and long-term morbidity associated with the preservation of saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with vulvar cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted in a total of 108 women who were diagnosed with vulvar cancer. The women undergoing preservation versus ligation of saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy were compared with respect to recurrence, disease-free survival, short and long term complications. RESULTS: Saphenous vein was spared in 88 inguinal incisions made in 51 women while saphenous vein was ligated in 101 inguinal incisions made in 57 women. When compared with those undergoing saphenous vein ligation, the short-term and long-term complications were significantly less frequent in women whose saphenous veins were spared (22.5% vs 42.4%, 12.7% vs 35.0% respectively; p<0.05). However local and lymphatic recurrence rates were comparable in women undergoing either preservation or ligation of saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy (19.3% vs 22.2%, 9.8% vs 10.5% respectively; p>0.05). The incidence of wound breakdown, local infection and chronic lymphedema were significantly lower in women undergoing saphenous vein preservation (0% vs 25.0%, 1.2% vs 38.3%, 11.6% vs 44.4% respectively; p<0.05). The existence of lymphatic involvement was found to be unassociated with the risk of acute or chronic lymphedema. CONCLUSIONS: The preservation of saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy reduces the incidence of short-term and long-term complications without affecting the risk of local recurrence. Depending on the experience of the surgeon, the surgical strategy should be individualized and optimized for each patient with vulvar cancer.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışma, vulva kanserli kadınlarda uygulanan inguinal lenfadenektomi sırasında gerçekleştirilen safenöz ven korumasının ilişkili olduğu kısa ve uzun vadeli morbiditeyi belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışma merkezinde, on yıllık bir dönem boyunca, vulva kanser nedeniyle inguinal lenfadenektomi uygulanan 108 kadın geriye dönük olarak incelenmiştir. Safenöz ven ligasyonu yapılan ve safenöz veni korunan olgular; nüks, ve hastalıksız sağkalım ile kısa ve uzun vadeli komplikasyonlar yönünden karşılaştırılmıştır. BULGULAR: Vulva kanseri nedeniyle 88 inguinal insizyon yapılan 51 kadında safenöz ven korunurken aynı nedenle 101 inguinal insizyon yapılan 57 kadında safenöz ven ligasyonu gerçekleştirilmiştir. Safenöz ven ligasyonu yapılan olgularla karşılaştırıldığında, safenöz veni korunan olgulardaki kısa ve uzun vadeli komplikasyon riski anlamlı olarak düşük bulunmuştur (sırasıyla %22,5 vs %42,4 ve %12,7 vs %35,0; p 0,05). Bundan başka, safenöz veni korunan olgulardaki yara ayrılması, lokal enfeksiyon ve kronik lenfödem riski anlmalı olarak düşüktür (sırasıyla %0 vs %25,0, %1,2 vs %38,3 ve %11,6 vs %44,4; p<0,05). Lenfatik tutulum ile akut veya kronik lenfödem riski arasında anlamlı bir ilişki gösterilememiştir. SONUÇ: İnguinal lenafdenektomi sırasında gerçekleştirilen sa fenöz ven koruması, lokal nüks riskini arttırmaksızın cerrahiyle ilişkili olarak ortaya çıkan kısa ve uzun vadeli komplikasyonları azaltmaktadır. Vulva kanseri tanısı konulan bir olgu için cerrahi yaklaşımda bulunulmadan önce cerrahın kişisel deneyimi de göz önüne alınmalı ve olguya özgü bir strateji planlanmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZAT, M., KANAT, M. P., GÜNGÖR, T., MOLLAMAHMUTOĞLU, L. (2011). Vulva kanserli kadınlarda safenöz venin korunduğu inguinal lenfadenektomi: Tek merkezde 10 yıllık deneyim. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 160–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/214853

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Jemal A. Siegel R. Ward E. et al. Cancer statistics 2008, CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96
  2. Dhar KK. Woolas RP. Changes in the management of vulval cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2003;17: 529-42
  3. Zhang SH. Sood AK. Sorosky JI. et al. Preservation of the saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy decreases morbidity in patients with carcinoma of the vulva. Cancer 2000;89:1520-5
  4. Dardarian TS. Gray HJ. Morgan MA. et al. Saphenous vein sparing during inguinal lymphadenectomy to reduce morbidity in patients with vulvar carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2006;101:140-2
  5. Wheless CH. Atlas of Pelvic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger 1981;343-9
  6. Catalona WJ. Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol 1988;51: 306-10
  7. Plaxe SC. Braley PS. Dottino PR. A simplified approach to superficial inguinal node dissection with sparing of the saphenous vein in patients with carcinoma of the vulva. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:295-300
  8. Zivanovic O. Khoury-Collado F. Abu Rustum NR. Gemignani ML. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of vulva cancer, cervical cancer and endometrial cancer. Oncologist 2009;14:695-705
  9. Lin JY. DuBeshter B. Angel C. Dvoretsky PM. Morbidity and recurrence with modifications of radical vulvectomy and groin dissection. Gynecol Oncol 1992;47:80-6
  10. Hopkins MP. Reid GC. Morley GW. Radical vulvectomy. The decision for the incision. Cancer 1993;72:799-803
  11. Morrow CP, Curtin JP. Gynecologic cancer surgery. New York: Churchill Livingston;1996
  12. Iwasaka T. Current trends in the management of vulvar carcinoma. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2005;32:1121-7
  13. Gould N. Kamelle S. Tillmanns T. Scribner D. Gold M, Walker J. et al. Predictors of complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:329-32
  14. Le T. Elsugi R. Hopkins L. Faught W. Fung-Kee-Fung M. The definition of optimal inguinal femoral nodal dissection in the management of vulva squamous cell cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2128-32
  15. Zhang X. Sheng X. Niu J. Li H Li D. Tang L. Li Q. Li Q. Sparing of saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy for vulval malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105: 722-6
  16. Rouzier R. Haddad B. Dubernard G. Dubois P. Paniel BJ. Inguinofemoral dissection for carcinoma of the vulva: effect of modifications of extent and technique on morbidity and survival. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:442-50
  17. Kehoe S. Luesley D.