Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Ön çapraz bağ yırtığının “endobutton CL” sistemi ve dört katlı hamstring tendon otogrefti ile rekonstrüsiyonunun sonuçları

The results of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the “endobutton CL” system and four-strand hamstring tendon autografts

Pages
208–212
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Reconstruction of the ACL using four-strand hamstring tendons and Endobutton CL femoral fixation may be a safe and effective met- hod, resulting in considerably high success rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The study included 74 male, 2 female patients (mean age 26,7 years; range 17 to 43 years) with chronic ACL ruptures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Reconstruction of the ACL using four-strand hamstring tendons and Endobutton CL femoral fixation may be a safe and effective met- hod, resulting in considerably high success rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft. Material and Method: The study included 74 male, 2 female patients (mean age 26,7 years; range 17 to 43 years) with chronic ACL ruptures. Invol- vement was in the right knee in 39 patients, and in the left knee in 37 patients. All the patients were treated with a four-strand hamstring autograft, Endobutton CL femoral fixation and an interference screw on the tibial side. All patients had an ACL reconstruction with an autogenous four-strand hamstring graft. Forty-one patients received treatment for other meniscal pathologies. All patients followed a similar accelerated rehabilitation prog- ram after surgery. Final evaluations were made using the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring systems, Cinci- nati and the Tegner activity rating system in the final follow-up. Results: The Lysholm scores were good and excellent for 67 patients (88,2 %) and the IKDC scores were grade A or B in 68 patients (89,4 %) and grade C in 8 patients (10,5 %). Radiographic examination showed mild (three patients) or moderate (two patients) degenerative changes in the knee joint. Compared with the normal side, no flexion or extension losses occurred in the affected knees. Conclusion: Reconstruction of the ACL using four-strand hamstring tendons and Endobutton CL femoral fixation may be a safe and effective met- hod, resulting in considerably high success rates.

Özet

Amaç: Hamstring tendon otogrefti kullanılarak ön çapraz bağ (ÖÇB) rekonstrüksiyonu yapılan hastaların sonuçları değerlendirildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya kronik ÖÇB yırtığı olan 74 erkek, 2 bayan hasta (ort. yaş 26,7; dağılım 17-43) alındı. Otuz dokuz hastada sağ dizde, 37 hastada sol dizde lezyon vardı. Tüm hastalar artroskopik olarak dört katlı otogreft hamstring tendonu, proksimal tespit Endobutton CL sistemi ve tibial tarafta interferans vidası ile tedavi edildi. Kırk bir hastanın, cerrahi sırasında tespit edilen menisküs problemlerine parsiyel menisektomi uygu- landı. Bütün hastalara postoperatif dönemde benzer hızlandırılmış iyileştirme programları uygulandı. Hastalar ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) skorlama, Cincinati ve Tegner aktivite derecelendirme sistemleri ile takip edildiler. Bulgular: Lysholm skorlamasında 67 hasta (% 88,2) iyi ve mükemmel sonuç, IKDC skorlamasına göre 68 hasta (% 89,4) A veya B, 8 hasta (% 10,5) ise C olarak değerlendirildi. Radyografik değerlendirmede, üç hastanın diz ekleminde hafif, iki hastada orta derecede dejeneratif değişiklikler gözlen- di. Sağlam tarafla karşılaştırıldığında, hastalarda fleksiyon ve ekstansiyon kaybı gözlenmedi. Sonuç: ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonunda dörtlü hamstring tendonu ve Endobutton CL sistemi ile yapılanlan cerrahi tedavinin güvenli ve orta dönem sonuçlarının başarılı olduğu görüşüne varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERBEST, S., YILMAZ, E. (2013). Ön çapraz bağ yırtığının “endobutton CL” sistemi ve dört katlı hamstring tendon otogrefti ile rekonstrüsiyonunun sonuçları. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 208–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/214787

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Gottlob CA, Baker CL, Pellissier JM. Colvin L. Cost effecti- veness of anterior crucite ligament reconstruction in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 367: 272-82
  2. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Ryoke K, Kuriwaka M. Mechanoreceptors in the anterior Cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 330- 3. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, et al. Anterior crucia- te ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon- bone grafts with twostrand hamstring grafts: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 1503-13
  3. Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R, Biddau F, Sasso F. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendonbone compared with double semitendinosus and grasilis tendon grafts, a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 2143-55
  4. Freedman K, D’Amato M, Nedeff D, Ari Kaz, Bach B. Arth- roscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaa- nalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autog- rafts. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 2-11
  5. Valentin A, Engström B, Werner S. ACL reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring grafts economical aspects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 4: 536-41
  6. Serbest S, Tosun HB, Yılmaz E. Hamstring Tendon Otogrefti ile Ön Çapraz Bağ Rekonstrüksiyonu. Fırat Tıp Dergisi 2011; 16: 186-9
  7. Gorschewsky O, Klakow A, Riechert K, Pitzl M, Becker R. Clinical comparison of the Tutoplast allograft and autologous patellar tendon (bone-patellar tendon-bone) for the reconstruc- tion of the anterior cruciate ligament: 2- and 6-year results. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33: 1202-9
  8. Peterson RK, Shelton WR, Bomboy AL. Allograft versus autograft patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruc- tion: A 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2001; 17: 9-13
  9. Tashiro T, Kurosawa H, Kawakami A, Hikita A, Fukui N. Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A de- tailed evaluation with comparison of single- and double- tendon harvest. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 522-9
  10. Chun CH, Han HJ, Lee BC, Kim DC, Yang JH. Histologic findings of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ac- hilles allograft. Clin Orthopaedics &Related Res 2004; 421: 273-6
  11. Harner CD, Olson E, Irrgang JJ, Silverstein S, Fu FH, Silbey M. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament re- construction: 3 to 5 year outcome. Clin Orthopaedics &