Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Multislice mapping and quantification of brain perfusion MR imaging data: a comparative study of homemade and commercial software

Pages
182–188
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, this program should be tested with different categories of diseases and a larger patient population and then compared with different commercial software programs to be validated more clearly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We developed a homemade computer program for analysis of perfusion weighted MR imaging (PW-MRI) data in order to produce colored multislice rCBV, rCBF, and MTT maps.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS Studies of 20 patients were performed on a high field MR scanner.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, this program should be tested with different categories of diseases and a larger patient population and then compared with different commercial software programs to be validated more clearly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beyin haritalandırılması · Görüntü işleme · bilgisayar destekli

Abstract

PURPOSE We developed a homemade computer program for analysis of perfusion weighted MR imaging (PW-MRI) data in order to produce colored multislice rCBV, rCBF, and MTT maps. We then compared those maps with others produced by a commercially available program, obtained from the same PW-MRI data, to determine the feasibility of using our program in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Studies of 20 patients were performed on a high field MR scanner. Imaging protocol consisted of perfusion study (EPI, TR/TE: 1430/46 msec, 10 mm gap, matrix: 128x128, FOV: 240 cm, NEX: 1). Twenty ml of Gd-DTPA was administered at a rate of 4-5 ml/sec beginning at the 5th acquisition of 50 dynamic series. MATLAB software was used for writing codes of both mathematical equations and the graphical user interface. All images were in DICOM standard. For validation of the results, all maps were compared with another commercially available program, which is widely being used in daily practice, and was installed on the MR scanner. Ability to define the lesion contours and extension, and artifacts at the bone-soft tissue interface were the criteria used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS Field definition was equally good in 38% of the patient scans for both software programs; our homemade software was better in 23% of the cases and the commercial software was better in 31%. In 6% of the results, either software program was not sufficient. For the elimination of artifacts, our homemade software was 100% successful in every case. CONCLUSION Our homemade program is a user friendly one that gives comparable results with those of a commonly used commercial one. However, this program should be tested with different categories of diseases and a larger patient population and then compared with different commercial software programs to be validated more clearly.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIÖZ, U., OĞUZ, K. K., ŞENTÜRK, S., CİLA, A. (2005). Multislice mapping and quantification of brain perfusion MR imaging data: a comparative study of homemade and commercial software. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 182–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/214757

References (15)

  1. Calamante F, Thomas DL, Pell GS, Wiersma J, Turner R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999; 19:701-735
  2. Barbier EL, Lamalle L, Decorps M. Methodology of brain perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 496-500
  3. Edelman RR, Siewert B, Darby DG, Thangaraj V, Nobre AC, Mesulam MM. Qualitative mapping of cerebral blood-flow and functional localization with echo-planar MR imaging and signal targeting with alternating radio-frequency. Radiology 1994; 192:513- 520
  4. Restrepo L, Wityk RJ, Grega MA, et al. Diffusion and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Stroke 2002; 33:2909-2915
  5. Tsushima Y, Funabasama S, Sanada S, Aoki J, Endo K. Perfusion changes of hepatic parenchyma due to infectious hepatobiliary disease: demonstration by perfusion CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2003; 27:289-291
  6. Yoshiura T, Mihara F, Kuwabara Y, et al. MR relative cerebral blood flow mapping of Alzheimer disease: correlation with Tc- 99m HMPAO SPECT. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:1383-1387
  7. Arioz U, Oguz KK, Baysal U, Cila A, Implementation of a home-made software for quantitative evaluation of perfusion MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2003; S45: S48-S49
  8. Arioz U, Oguz KK, Baysal U, Cila A, Implementation of a home-made software for quantitative evaluation of cerebral perfusion parameters’ maps from 3T MR system. Workshop on Quantitative Cerebral Perfusion Imaging Using MRI: A Technical Perspective 2004; 185-186, Venice, Italy
  9. Reimer P, Puskas Z, Starck P. How to PWMRI. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 2003; Supp2, 16:63-66
  10. Siegal T, Rubinstein R, TzukShina T, Gomori JM. Utility of relative CBV mapping derived from perfusion MRI in the routine follow up of brain tumors. J Neurosurg 1997; 86:22-27
  11. Gobbel GT, Fike JR, A deconvolution method for evaluating indicator-dilution curves. Phys Med Biol 1994; 39:1833-1854
  12. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Vevea JM, Brady TJ. Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14:249-265
  13. Perkiö JP, Aronen HJ, Kangasmaki A, et al. Evaluation of four postprocessing methods for determination of cerebral blood volume and mean transit time by dynamic contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:973-981
  14. Stewart GN. Researches on the circulation time in organs and on the influences, which affect it. J Physiology 1894; 15:1-89
  15. Bell BA. A history of the study of the cerebra