SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bilig / Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 61

The Process of Political Institutionalization in the Turkic Republics: An Inventory of the Last Two Decades

Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde Siyasal Kurumsallaşma Süreci: Geçen Yirmi Yılın Bir Bilançosu

Haluk ALKAN
Pages
1–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study draws some conclusions about these countries' political systems with regard to structures, differentiation and potential for change.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the political systems of the Turkic Republics (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan) were mainly evaluated on the basis of international relations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since such approaches tend to ignore these countries' internal dynamics, it is necessary to develop a new framework of analysis which takes internal dynamics into account.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study draws some conclusions about these countries' political systems with regard to structures, differentiation and potential for change.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the political systems of the Turkic Republics (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan) were mainly evaluated on the basis of international relations. Since such approaches tend to ignore these countries' internal dynamics, it is necessary to develop a new framework of analysis which takes internal dynamics into account. This study examines the political changes these Republics underwent in the last two decades, focusing especially on institutions, democratization and systems. The study draws some conclusions about these countries' political systems with regard to structures, differentiation and potential for change.

Özet

Sovyetler Birliği dağıldıktan sonra Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde siyasal kurumsallaşma süreci daha çok uluslararası ilişkiler temelinde değerlendirilmiştir. Bu yaklaşımlar bu ülkelerin iç dinamiklerini ikinci plana ittiklerinden, konu ile ilgili yeni analiz çerçevelerinin geliştirilmesine gereksinim bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Türk cumhuriyetlerinin bağımsızlıktan bu güne yirmi yıl içinde geçirdikleri siyasal değişim kurumsal, demokratikleşme ve sistem boyutları ışığında incelenmektedir. Çalışmanın sonunda, bu ülkelerin yapılar, farklılaşmalar ve potansiyel değişimleri konusunda ulaşılan sonuçlar belirtilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKAN, H. (2012). The Process of Political Institutionalization in the Turkic Republics: An Inventory of the Last Two Decades. Bilig / Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 61, 1–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/214674

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alibekov, İbrahim (2002). "Russian Party of Kazakhstan may Reflect Moscow's Influence". Eurasia Insight. 14 Nisan. Alkan, Haluk (2010a). "Kırgızistan'da 2010 Anayasası ve Yeni Siyasal Rejim". Avrasya Analiz 1 (Sonbahar): 4-16. _____, (2010b). Kırgızistan: Otoriter Merkezîleşmeye Karşı Merkezkaç Direnişin Gölgesinde Siyasal İstikrarsızlık. Ankara: SDE Analiz. _____, (2010c). Azerbaycan Paradoksu: Çapraz Baskılar Altında Siyasal Sistem ve Dış Politika. Ankara: USAK Yay. _____, (2011). Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde Siyasal Hayat ve Kurumlar. Ankara:
  2. USAK Yay. Alkan, Haluk ve Müzeyyen Eroğlu (2011). "Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde Siyasal Partiler: Kazakistan ve Özbekistan Siyasal Parti Sistemleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz". Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları Dergisi 6 (12): 68-87.
  3. Andrew, Nikolai (1994). "Grappling with Democracy". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 50 (1): 52-55.
  4. Beblawi, Hazem ve Giacomo Luciani (1987).
  5. The Rentier State. Nation, State and Integration in the Arab World. London: Croom Helm. Bremmer, Ian ve Cory Welt (1996). "The Trouble with Democracy in Kazakh- stan". Central Asian Survey 15 (2): 179-199.
  6. Carey, John M. ve Matthew S. Shugart (1998). Executive Decree Authority. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Carlisle, Donald S. (1991). "Power and Politics in Soviet Uzbekistan: from Stalin to Gorbachev". Soviet Central Asia the Failed Transformation. Ed. W. Fierman. Oxford: Westview Pres. 93-129.
  8. Chehabi, Houchang ve Juan J. Linz (Ed.) (1998). Sultanistic Regime. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Pres. Cornell, Svante E. (2001). "Democratization Falters in Azerbaijan". Journal of Democracy 12(2): 118-131.
  9. Curtis, Glenn E. (Ed.) (1996). Uzbekistan-A Country Study. Library of Congress, Washington. 1996, http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/uztoc.html#uz0001, [14.11.2011]. "Degradation of Power" (1999). Centralno-Asiatsky Bulleten. Kasım. Diamond, Larry (2002). "Elections Without Democracy Thinking about Hybrid Regimes". Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21-35.
  10. Drompp, Michael (2002). "The Yenisei Kyrgyz from Early Times to the Mongol Conquest". Turks. V. 1. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yay. 480-488.
  11. Elgie, Robert (1999). "The Politics of Semi-presidentialism". Semi-presidentialism in Europe. Ed. R. Elgie. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1-21.
  12. Fish, M. Steven (2001). "The Executive Deception: Superpresidentialism and the Degradation of Russian Politics". Ed. Valerie Sperling. Building the Rus- sian State: Institutional Crisis and the Quest for Democrat