Journals / Turkish Studies - Social Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation Overthe “BabyBoomers” and “Y” Generation in the Context of Perspective Towardsthe Digital Advertisement

Diital Reklamlara Bakış Açıları Bağlamında BabyBoobers ve Y Kuşağı Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme

Pages
145–158
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For example, the interviews with 16 individuals of baby boomer and Y generation with various demographic characteristicsare made one-on-one.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Individuals perceptions, expectations, perspective on life and behaviours change depending on generation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to reveal the differences of Baby boomers generation individuals’, raised with the land phones as a communication medium and trying to get adapted to the new technologies (1946-65) and 24 hours online, libertarian Y generation individuals’ raised in a World with the opportunities of communication technologies, point of views, thoughts and attitudes towards the advertisements issued online.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For example, the interviews with 16 individuals of baby boomer and Y generation with various demographic characteristicsare made one-on-one.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Individuals perceptions, expectations, perspective on life and behaviours change depending on generation. The concept of generation comes with the individuals who were born at the same, sharing the common sense. It’s possible to give the advertisement prompts which don’t have any time and place restriction and reach users by e-mails, social media and search engines via computers and mobile devices as an example. When the existence of individuals belonging to one of four different generations living and working at the same environment considered. The individuals of different conditions, periods and opportunities will surely have a different point of view to the digital advertisements which is called as new generation advertisements. This study aims to reveal the differences of Baby boomers generation individuals’, raised with the land phones as a communication medium and trying to get adapted to the new technologies (1946-65) and 24 hours online, libertarian Y generation individuals’ raised in a World with the opportunities of communication technologies, point of views, thoughts and attitudes towards the advertisements issued online. In this context, qualitative research method in-depth interview is applied, semi-structured and open-ended questions are used. For example, the interviews with 16 individuals of baby boomer and Y generation with various demographic characteristicsare made one-on-one.

Özet

Bireylerin algıları, beklentileri, hayata bakış açıları ve davranışları zamana bağlı olarak değişmekte, aynı zaman diliminde dünyaya gelen bireylerin ortak bazı özelliklere sahip olması kuşak kavramını beraberinde getirmektedir. Yer ve zaman kısıtlaması olmaksızın kitlelere ulaşabilen dijital reklamlara örnek olarak, masaüstü bilgisayarlar ve mobil cihazlar vasıtası ile internet üzerinden kullanıcılara ulaşan e-postalar, sosyal medya ve arama motoru reklamları gibi reklam iletilerini örnek vermemiz mümkündür. Gündelik yaşamda bir arada yaşamak ve çalışmak zorunda olan dört kuşağa mensup bireylerin varlığı düşünüldüğünde, değişik dönemler ve koşullar içinde, farklı olanaklara sahip olarak yaşayan bireylerin dijital reklamlar dediğimiz yeni nesil reklamlara bakış açılarında da farklılıklar olacağı muhakkaktır. Yapılan bu çalışmada, iletişim ortamı olarak sabit telefonlarla büyüyüp yeni teknolojilere entegre olmaya çalışan BabyBoomer kuşağı bireyleri (1946-65) ve iletişim teknolojilerinin sunduğu olanakların var olduğu bir dünyada yetişen, yeni teknolojilerle büyüyüp 24 saat çevrimiçi olan özgürlükçü Y kuşağı bireylerinin (1980-1999) dijital mecralarda yayınlanan reklamlara karşı bakış açılarına, düşüncelerine ve tutumlarına yansıyan farklılıkların ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda araştırmada, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden derinlemesine görüşme tekniği uygulanarak, yarı yapılandırılmış soru formlarında açık uçlu sorulara yer verilmiştir. Örneklem olarak alınan, değişik demografik özelliklere sahip BabyBoomers ve Y kuşağı üyelerinden 16 kişi ile yüz yüze görüşmeler yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRTAŞ, O. (2020). Evaluation Overthe “BabyBoomers” and “Y” Generation in the Context of Perspective Towardsthe Digital Advertisement. Turkish Studies - Social Sciences, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 145–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/214447

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of management review, 836-863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678.
  2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 932-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
  3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1- 18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  4. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 20-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
  5. Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business and Society, 41(3), 292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302041003003
  6. Berry, L. L. (1981). The employee as customer. Journal of Retail Banking, 25-80.
  7. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper&Row. Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press.
  8. Brown, T. J., Dacin, P. A., Pratt, M. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 34(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284969
  9. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701570866
  10. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203726532
  11. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
  12. Daugherty, E. L. (2001). Public relations and social responsibility. R. Heath içinde, Handbook of Public Relations (s. 389-401). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220727.n31
  13. Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational ada