Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Zooplankton of Two Drinking Water Reservoirs in Central Anatolia: Composition and Seasonal Cycle

Pages
9–16
Publication Date
2005-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The cyclopoid copepod Cyclops vicinus was dominant in Kurtboğazı and calanoid Acanthodiaptomus denticornis in Çamlıdere.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Comparative studies were performed on the zooplankton composition and some physical and chemical properties of the Kurtboğazı and Çamlıdere reservoirs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Zooplankton abundance, conductivity, organic matter, hardness and orthophosphate concentrations were lower and Secchi depth was higher in Çamlıdere than in Kurtboğazı (P < 0.01).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The cyclopoid copepod Cyclops vicinus was dominant in Kurtboğazı and calanoid Acanthodiaptomus denticornis in Çamlıdere.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Zooplankton · composition · trophic state

Abstract

Comparative studies were performed on the zooplankton composition and some physical and chemical properties of the Kurtboğazı and Çamlıdere reservoirs. Zooplankton abundance, conductivity, organic matter, hardness and orthophosphate concentrations were lower and Secchi depth was higher in Çamlıdere than in Kurtboğazı (P < 0.01). Rotifera species such as Polyarthra dolichoptera, Keratella quadrata, Asplanchna priodonta and Ascomorpha saltans showed peaks, particularly in spring, summer and late summer. Diaphanosoma lacustris, Bosmina longirostris and Ceriodaphnia quadrangula of Cladocera species increased in late summer whereas Bosmina longirostris and Daphnia spp. were prominent in spring. The cyclopoid copepod Cyclops vicinus was dominant in Kurtboğazı and calanoid Acanthodiaptomus denticornis in Çamlıdere.

Özet

Comparative studies were performed on the zooplankton composition and some physical and chemical properties of the Kurtboğazı and Çamlıdere reservoirs. Zooplankton abundance, conductivity, organic matter, hardness and orthophosphate concentrations were lower and Secchi depth was higher in Çamlıdere than in Kurtboğazı (P < 0.01). Rotifera species such as Polyarthra dolichoptera, Keratella quadrata, Asplanchna priodonta and Ascomorpha saltans showed peaks, particularly in spring, summer and late summer. Diaphanosoma lacustris, Bosmina longirostris and Ceriodaphnia quadrangula of Cladocera species increased in late summer whereas Bosmina longirostris and Daphnia spp. were prominent in spring. The cyclopoid copepod Cyclops vicinus was dominant in Kurtboğazı and calanoid Acanthodiaptomus denticornis in Çamlıdere.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, N. (2005). Zooplankton of Two Drinking Water Reservoirs in Central Anatolia: Composition and Seasonal Cycle. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 9–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/214332

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbay, N. 1993. Keban Baraj Gölünün Ova Kısmında Fito- Zooplanktonun Horizontal ve Vertikal Dağılımı. Yük. Lis. Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ, 70 s. APHA, 1975. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 14thed. American Public Health Association, Washington D.C. Aykulu, G. and Obalı, O. 1981. Phytoplankton biomass in the Kurtboğazı dam lake. Comm. de la Fac. Sci. d’Ank. 24: 29-45.
  2. Bakan Demir, N. 1997. Ankara’ya Su Sağlayan Kurtboğazı ve Çamlıdere Baraj Gölleri ile İvedik Su Arıtım Tesisi’nde Plankton Kompozisyonunun Karflılafltırmalı Olarak İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, 112 s. Chow-Fraser, P. and Trew, D.O. 1990. A Compendium of Limnological Data for 23 Lakes in the Beaver River Watershed. Alberta Environ., Edmonton. Demir, N. and Atay, D. 1999. Kurtboğazı ve Çamlıdere Baraj Göllerinin Fitoplanktonu. X. Ulusal Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu, Cilt II, Adana, pp. 577-587.
  3. Dokulil, M., Herzig, A. and Jagsch, A. 1990. Trophic relationships in the pelagic zone of Mondsee, Austria. Hydrobiologia, 191: 199-212. DSİ. 1981. Kurtboğazı Baraj Gölü Limnolojik ve Hidrobiyolojik Özelliklerinin Tesbiti (1979-1981).
  4. DSİ, Ankara. DSİ. 1996. Türkiye’deki Barajlar ve Hidroelektrik Santraller. DSİ, Ankara.
  5. Herzig, A. 1987. The analysis of planktonic rotifer populations: A plea for long-term investigations. Hydrobiologia, 147: 163-180.
  6. Kiefer, F. and Fryer, G. 1978. Das Zooplankton des Binnengewasser. 2. Teil. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart. Koste, W. 1978.
  7. Rotatoria, Die Radiertiere Mitteleuropas. 2 Bande. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin. Lind, O.T., Terrell, T.T. and Kimmel, B.G. 1993. Problems in reservoir trophic-state classification and implications for reservoir management. In: Comparative Reservoir Limnology and Water Quality Management (Eds. M. Straskaba, J.G. Tundisi and A. Duncan), Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp. 57-67.
  8. Maier, G. 1996. Copepod communities in lakes of varying trophic degree. Arch. Hydrobiol. 136: 455-465.
  9. Mallin, M.A., Stone, K.L. and Pamperl, M.A. 1994. Phytoplankton community assessments of seven Southeast U.S. cooling reservoirs. Water Research, 28: 665-673.
  10. Negrea, S. 1983.
  11. Fauna Republicii Socialiste Romania, Crustacea Cladocera. Vol. 4, Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste Romania Press,
  12. Bucureflti. Soballe, D.M. and Bachman, R.W. 1984. Influence of reservoir transit on riverine algal transport and abundance. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 1803-1813. TSE. 1997. Sular-İçme ve Kullanma Su