Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

MR urography in pediatric uropathies with dilated urinary tracts

Pages
225–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION In children, MR urography may replace conventional uroradiological methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE To determine the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance (MR) urography in children with urinary tract dilatation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five children between the ages of 4 months and 13 years (19 males and 6 females, mean age 6.5 years) were evaluated with T2 weighted and contrastenhanced T1 weighted MR sequences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION In children, MR urography may replace conventional uroradiological methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gadolinium DTPA · Kontrast ortamı · Genişleme

Abstract

PURPOSE To determine the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance (MR) urography in children with urinary tract dilatation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five children between the ages of 4 months and 13 years (19 males and 6 females, mean age 6.5 years) were evaluated with T2 weighted and contrastenhanced T1 weighted MR sequences. Results were compared with findings obtained with ultrasonography (n=25), intravenous urography (n=18), Tc99m- DTPA scintigraphy (n=16), and/or micturating cystouretrography (n=13). RESULTS MR urography provided a superior imaging of urinary system dilatation, the site and the etiology of obstruction, and both regular and complicated kidney duplication than did conventional imaging methods. MR urography that used T2 weighted sequences was able to demonstrate 29 of 32 (90.6%) abnormal renal collecting systems. Fourteen of 21 (66.7%) normal systems were revealed by heavily T2 weighted images. Forty-six of 51 (90.2%) renal collecting systems could be shown by T1 weighted sequences. With this sequence, however, five collecting systems (9.8%) could not be shown secondary to poor renal function and/or dilution of contrast agent within the dilated urinary tract. CONCLUSION In children, MR urography may replace conventional uroradiological methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAOĞLU, M., ILICA, A. T., BULAKBAŞI, N., ERGİN, A., ÜSTÜNSÖZ, B., SANAL, T., TAYFUN, C., SOMUNCU, İ. (2005). MR urography in pediatric uropathies with dilated urinary tracts. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 225–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/214152

References (16)

  1. Karabacakoglu A, Karakose S, Ince O, Cobankara OE, Karalezli G. Diagnostic valueof diuretic-enhanced excretory MR urography in patients with obstructive uropathy. Eur J Radiol 2004; 52:320-327
  2. Riccabona M. Pediatric MRU-its potentialand its role in the diagnostic work-up of upper urinary tract dilatation in infants and children. World J Urol 2004; 22:79-87
  3. Borthne AS, Pierre-Jerome C, Gjesdal KI, Storaas T, Courivaud F, Eriksen M. Pediatric excretory MR urography: comparative study of enhanced and non-enhanced techniques. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:1423-1427
  4. Nolte-Ernsting CC, Staatz G, Tacke J, Gunther RW. MR urography today. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28:191-209
  5. Avni EF, Bali MA, Regnault M, Damry N,Degroot F, Metens T, Matos C. MR urography in children. Eur J Radiol 2002; 43:154- 166
  6. Riccabona M, Simbrunner J, Ring E, Ruppert- Kohlmayr A, Ebner F, Fotter R. Feasibility of MR urography in neonates and infants with anomalies of the upper urinary tract. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1442-1450
  7. Nolte-Ernsting CC, Adam GB, Gunther RW. MR urography: examination techniques and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:355-372
  8. Verswijvel GA, Oyen RH, Van Poppel HP, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of urologic disease: an all-in-one approach. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1614-1619
  9. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 1986; 3:823-833
  10. Zielonko J, Studniarek M, Markuszewski M. MR urography of obstructive uropathy: diagnostic value of the method in selected clinical groups. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:802- 809
  11. Hughes J, Jan W, Goodie J, Lund R, Rankin S. MR urography: evaluation of different techniques in non-dilated tracts. Clin Radiol 2002; 57:989-994
  12. Leppert A, Nadalin S, Schirg E, Petersen C, Kardorff R, Galanski M, Fuchs J. Impact of magnetic resonance urography on preoperative diagnostic workup in children affected by hydronephrosis: should IVU be replaced? J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37:1441-1445
  13. Erdoğmuş B, Bozkurt M, Bakır Z. Üriner sistem obstrüksiyonlarında HASTE tekniğinin ve ekskretuar MR ürografinin tanı değeri. Tani Girisim Radyol 2004; 10:309-315
  14. Borthne A, Pierre-Jerome C, Nordshus T, Reiseter T. MR urography in children: current status and future development. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:503-511
  15. Borthne A, Nordshus T, Reiseter T, et al. MR urography: the future gold standard in pediatric urogenital imaging? Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29:694-701
  16. Roy C, Saussin